Upload leverage_summary.txt
Browse files- unet/leverage_summary.txt +76 -0
unet/leverage_summary.txt
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
|
| 2 |
+
LEVERAGE PAPER RESULTS SUMMARY
|
| 3 |
+
================================
|
| 4 |
+
Experiment Timestamp: 20251124_152044
|
| 5 |
+
WMH Segmentation: Binary vs Three-class Classification Comparison
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
DATASET INFORMATION:
|
| 8 |
+
--------------------
|
| 9 |
+
Training Images: 2050
|
| 10 |
+
Test Images: 350
|
| 11 |
+
Image Size: (256, 256)
|
| 12 |
+
Classes: Background (0), Normal WMH (1), Abnormal WMH (2)
|
| 13 |
+
|
| 14 |
+
METHODOLOGY:
|
| 15 |
+
------------
|
| 16 |
+
Architecture: Enhanced U-Net with Batch Normalization and Dropout
|
| 17 |
+
Loss Functions:
|
| 18 |
+
- Scenario 1: weighted_bce
|
| 19 |
+
- Scenario 2: weighted_categorical
|
| 20 |
+
Training Epochs: 50
|
| 21 |
+
Batch Size: 8
|
| 22 |
+
Learning Rate: 0.0001
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
PERFORMANCE RESULTS:
|
| 25 |
+
--------------------
|
| 26 |
+
| Scenario 1 (Binary) | Scenario 2 (3-class) | Improvement
|
| 27 |
+
--------------------|---------------------|----------------------|------------
|
| 28 |
+
Accuracy | 0.9852 | 0.9965 | +0.0112
|
| 29 |
+
Precision | 0.3340 | 0.7589 | +0.4248
|
| 30 |
+
Recall | 0.9682 | 0.7765 | -0.1917
|
| 31 |
+
Dice Coefficient | 0.4967 | 0.7676 | +0.2709
|
| 32 |
+
IoU Coefficient | 0.3304 | 0.6228 | +0.2924
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE:
|
| 35 |
+
-------------------------
|
| 36 |
+
DICE COEFFICIENT:
|
| 37 |
+
Test: Paired t-test
|
| 38 |
+
t-statistic: 9.6244
|
| 39 |
+
p-value: 0.0000
|
| 40 |
+
Effect Size (Cohen's d): 0.5643
|
| 41 |
+
95% Confidence Interval: [0.1353, 0.2051]
|
| 42 |
+
Result: SIGNIFICANT improvement
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
+
IoU COEFFICIENT:
|
| 45 |
+
Test: Paired t-test
|
| 46 |
+
t-statistic: 10.1596
|
| 47 |
+
p-value: 0.0000
|
| 48 |
+
Effect Size (Cohen's d): 0.6481
|
| 49 |
+
95% Confidence Interval: [0.1356, 0.2010]
|
| 50 |
+
Result: SIGNIFICANT improvement
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
KEY FINDINGS:
|
| 53 |
+
-------------
|
| 54 |
+
1. Three-class segmentation shows 56.54% improvement in Dice coefficient
|
| 55 |
+
2. Three-class segmentation shows 81.33% improvement in IoU coefficient
|
| 56 |
+
3. Dice analysis confirms significant improvement
|
| 57 |
+
4. IoU analysis confirms significant improvement
|
| 58 |
+
5. Post-processing provided substantial improvements in both scenarios
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
FILES GENERATED:
|
| 61 |
+
----------------
|
| 62 |
+
- Models: scenario1_binary_model.h5, scenario2_multiclass_model.h5
|
| 63 |
+
- Figures: training_curves.png/.pdf, comparison_visualization.png/.pdf, metrics_comparison.png/.pdf
|
| 64 |
+
- Tables: comprehensive_results.csv/.xlsx, latex_table.tex
|
| 65 |
+
- Statistics: statistical_analysis.json, statistical_report.txt
|
| 66 |
+
- Predictions: All test predictions and ground truth data saved
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
PUBLICATION READINESS:
|
| 69 |
+
----------------------
|
| 70 |
+
✓ High-resolution figures (300 DPI, PNG/PDF)
|
| 71 |
+
✓ LaTeX-formatted tables
|
| 72 |
+
✓ Comprehensive statistical analysis (Dice + IoU)
|
| 73 |
+
✓ Post-processing impact analysis
|
| 74 |
+
✓ Reproducible results with saved models
|
| 75 |
+
✓ Professional documentation
|
| 76 |
+
|