File size: 11,311 Bytes
484e3bc |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 |
"""
GeoBot 2.0 Analytical Framework Example
Demonstrates the complete GeoBot 2.0 framework for clinical systems analysis
with geopolitical nuance. Includes:
1. Framework overview
2. Analytical lenses demonstration
3. China Rocket Force purge analysis (example from specification)
4. Governance system comparison
5. Corruption type analysis
6. Non-Western military assessment
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, '..')
from geobot.analysis import (
AnalyticalEngine,
GeoBotFramework,
AnalyticalLenses,
GovernanceType,
CorruptionType
)
def print_section(title):
"""Print formatted section header."""
print("\n" + "=" * 80)
print(f" {title}")
print("=" * 80 + "\n")
def example_1_framework_overview():
"""Demonstrate GeoBot 2.0 framework overview."""
print_section("Example 1: GeoBot 2.0 Framework Overview")
framework = GeoBotFramework()
summary = framework.get_framework_summary()
print(f"Version: {summary['version']}")
print(f"Description: {summary['description']}\n")
print("Core Identity:")
print(f" Focus: {summary['identity']['focus']}")
print(f" Key Shift: {summary['identity']['key_shift']}\n")
print("Integration Elements:")
for element in summary['identity']['integration_elements']:
print(f" - {element}")
print("\nTone:")
print(summary['tone'])
print("\nAnalytical Principles:")
for i, principle in enumerate(summary['principles'], 1):
print(f" {i}. {principle}")
def example_2_china_rocket_force_analysis():
"""
Demonstrate complete analysis using China Rocket Force purge example
from the GeoBot 2.0 specification.
"""
print_section("Example 2: China Rocket Force Purge Analysis")
engine = AnalyticalEngine()
query = "China removed several top Rocket Force generals. What does this mean?"
context = {
'governance_type': GovernanceType.AUTHORITARIAN_CENTRALIZED,
'corruption_type': CorruptionType.MANAGED_BOUNDED,
'military_system': 'Chinese PLA',
'scenario_description': 'Leadership purge in strategic forces',
'operational_context': 'Strategic nuclear forces readiness',
'summary': """The purge indicates internal accountability enforcement within strategic forces
command, with mixed implications for near-term readiness and decision coherence.""",
'logistics_assessment': """Rocket Force maintenance, silo integration, and inventory control
are likely under audit. Purges typically follow discovery of procurement irregularities or
readiness misreporting. However, unlike Russian corruption patterns, Chinese anti-corruption
campaigns since 2012 have successfully constrained (though not eliminated) defense sector
embezzlement. The PLA's civil-military logistics integration provides redundancy that mitigates
some supply chain risks.""",
'scenarios': [
{
'name': 'Routine institutional maintenance',
'probability': 0.50,
'description': 'Temporary disruption, return to baseline within 6-12 months'
},
{
'name': 'Deeper procurement crisis',
'probability': 0.30,
'description': 'Extended degradation of readiness reporting reliability'
},
{
'name': 'Factional conflict',
'probability': 0.15,
'description': 'Prolonged command instability'
},
{
'name': 'Major reorganization',
'probability': 0.05,
'description': 'Strategic forces restructure'
}
],
'uncertainty_factors': [
'Limited visibility into CCP internal dynamics and audit findings'
],
'signals_to_watch': [
'Promotion patterns (meritocratic vs. factional indicators)',
'Training tempo changes (satellite observable)',
'Procurement contract patterns',
'Whether purges expand beyond Rocket Force'
],
'comparative_notes': """Russia's similar aerospace purges (2015-2017) resulted in sustained
degradation because underlying corruption was never addressed—only individuals were replaced.
China's systemic anti-corruption infrastructure suggests different trajectory is possible."""
}
# Add governance context
context['governance_context'] = {
'trade_off': """China gains long-term institutional integrity at the cost of
short-term command continuity.""",
'context_specific_advantage': """Authoritarian systems can execute rapid leadership
replacement without legislative constraints, allowing faster course correction than
consensus-based systems. However, this creates temporary communication disruption and
institutional memory loss."""
}
# Add corruption details
context['corruption_details'] = {
'evidence': """Evidence suggests managed corruption model rather than parasitic:
purges indicate the system detected and acted on problems, rather than tolerating systemic decay.
This is structurally different from militaries where corruption goes unaddressed.""",
'risk_assessment': """Purge-induced fear may cause temporary over-reporting conservatism,
slowing mobilization responses."""
}
# Add non-Western context
context['non_western_context'] = {
'analysis_framework': """Western analysis often treats purges as pure weakness signals.
In Chinese institutional context, periodic purges are a maintenance mechanism for regime stability.
The question is whether this specific purge reflects routine enforcement or deeper structural crisis.""",
'key_distinction': """Indicators distinguishing routine vs. crisis:
- Scope: limited to RF or expanding to other services?
- Timing: related to specific audit cycle or sudden?
- Replacements: technocratic or factional?"""
}
# Perform analysis
analysis = engine.analyze(query, context)
print(analysis)
def example_3_governance_comparison():
"""Demonstrate governance system comparison."""
print_section("Example 3: Governance System Comparison")
engine = AnalyticalEngine()
scenario = "Rapid military mobilization in response to regional crisis"
comparison = engine.compare_governance_systems(
scenario=scenario,
authoritarian_context={},
democratic_context={}
)
print(comparison)
def example_4_corruption_assessment():
"""Demonstrate corruption type assessment."""
print_section("Example 4: Corruption Type Assessment")
lenses = AnalyticalLenses()
print("Corruption Type Analysis:\n")
# Assess different corruption types
corruption_types = [
(CorruptionType.PARASITIC, "Russia"),
(CorruptionType.MANAGED_BOUNDED, "China"),
(CorruptionType.INSTITUTIONALIZED_PATRONAGE, "Iran IRGC"),
(CorruptionType.LOW_CORRUPTION, "NATO countries")
]
for corr_type, example in corruption_types:
analysis = lenses.corruption.analyze(
corr_type,
operational_context="Sustained high-intensity conventional operations"
)
print(f"\n{corr_type.value.upper()} ({example}):")
print(f" Operational Impact: {analysis['operational_impact']}")
print(f" Characteristics:")
for char in analysis['characteristics']:
print(f" - {char}")
def example_5_non_western_military_assessment():
"""Demonstrate non-Western military analysis."""
print_section("Example 5: Non-Western Military Assessment")
lenses = AnalyticalLenses()
militaries = ["Chinese PLA", "Russian Military", "Iranian Systems"]
for military in militaries:
analysis = lenses.non_western.analyze(military)
print(f"\n{military.upper()}:")
print(f"\nOperational Culture: {analysis['operational_culture']}")
print("\nStrengths:")
for strength in analysis['strengths']:
print(f" - {strength}")
print("\nWeaknesses:")
for weakness in analysis['weaknesses']:
print(f" - {weakness}")
print(f"\nKey Insight: {analysis['key_insight']}")
def example_6_all_lenses_integration():
"""Demonstrate integration of all four lenses."""
print_section("Example 6: All Lenses Integration")
engine = AnalyticalEngine()
print("Analytical Priorities:\n")
priorities = engine.get_analytical_priorities()
for i, priority in enumerate(priorities, 1):
print(f"{i}. {priority}")
print("\n" + "-" * 80)
# Quick analysis example
print("\nQuick Analysis Example:")
print("Query: 'Iran's ability to sustain proxy operations in Syria'\n")
analysis = engine.quick_analysis(
query="Iran's ability to sustain proxy operations in Syria",
governance_type=GovernanceType.AUTHORITARIAN_CENTRALIZED,
corruption_type=CorruptionType.INSTITUTIONALIZED_PATRONAGE,
military_system="Iranian Systems",
summary="""Iran demonstrates structural advantages in proxy coordination despite
conventional military limitations. IRGC Quds Force maintains effective command and control
through patronage networks that double as operational infrastructure.""",
logistics_assessment="""Supply lines to Syria rely on air bridge through Iraq and
maritime routes. Vulnerable to interdiction but demonstrated resilience through redundancy.
Sanctions impact advanced systems but not basic sustainment.""",
scenarios=[
{
'name': 'Sustained proxy presence',
'probability': 0.60,
'description': 'Current operational tempo maintained'
},
{
'name': 'Degraded operations',
'probability': 0.30,
'description': 'Israeli interdiction reduces capability'
},
{
'name': 'Expansion',
'probability': 0.10,
'description': 'Regional instability creates opportunities'
}
]
)
print(analysis)
def main():
"""Run all examples."""
print("\n" + "=" * 80)
print(" GeoBot 2.0: Cold Systems Analysis with Geopolitical Nuance")
print("=" * 80)
examples = [
("Framework Overview", example_1_framework_overview),
("China Rocket Force Analysis", example_2_china_rocket_force_analysis),
("Governance Comparison", example_3_governance_comparison),
("Corruption Assessment", example_4_corruption_assessment),
("Non-Western Military Assessment", example_5_non_western_military_assessment),
("All Lenses Integration", example_6_all_lenses_integration),
]
print("\nAvailable Examples:")
for i, (name, _) in enumerate(examples, 1):
print(f" {i}. {name}")
print("\nRunning all examples...\n")
for name, example_func in examples:
try:
example_func()
except Exception as e:
print(f"Error in {name}: {e}")
import traceback
traceback.print_exc()
print("\n" + "=" * 80)
print(" All examples completed")
print("=" * 80 + "\n")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
|