Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Classification
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
10K - 100K
License:
Commit
·
db9acfa
1
Parent(s):
b14e1a9
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -13,15 +13,7 @@ tags:
|
|
| 13 |
pretty_name: spanex
|
| 14 |
size_categories:
|
| 15 |
- 1K<n<10K
|
| 16 |
-
---
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
SpanEx consists of 7071 instances annotated for span interactions.
|
| 19 |
-
SpanEx is the first dataset with human phrase-level interaction explanations with explicit labels for interaction types.
|
| 20 |
-
Moreover, SpanEx is annotated by three annotators, which opens new avenues for studies of human explanation agreement -- an understudied area in the explainability literature.
|
| 21 |
-
Our study reveals that while human annotators often agree on span interactions, they also offer complementary reasons for a prediction, collectively providing a comprehensive set of reasons for a prediction.
|
| 22 |
-
We collect explanations of span interactions for NLI on the SNLI dataset and for FC on the FEVER dataset.
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
---
|
| 25 |
configs:
|
| 26 |
- config_name: snli_extended
|
| 27 |
data_files:
|
|
@@ -39,4 +31,14 @@ configs:
|
|
| 39 |
data_files:
|
| 40 |
- split: test
|
| 41 |
path: fever.jsonl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
pretty_name: spanex
|
| 14 |
size_categories:
|
| 15 |
- 1K<n<10K
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 |
configs:
|
| 18 |
- config_name: snli_extended
|
| 19 |
data_files:
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
data_files:
|
| 32 |
- split: test
|
| 33 |
path: fever.jsonl
|
| 34 |
+
---
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
SpanEx consists of 7071 instances annotated for span interactions.
|
| 37 |
+
SpanEx is the first dataset with human phrase-level interaction explanations with explicit labels for interaction types.
|
| 38 |
+
Moreover, SpanEx is annotated by three annotators, which opens new avenues for studies of human explanation agreement -- an understudied area in the explainability literature.
|
| 39 |
+
Our study reveals that while human annotators often agree on span interactions, they also offer complementary reasons for a prediction, collectively providing a comprehensive set of reasons for a prediction.
|
| 40 |
+
We collect explanations of span interactions for NLI on the SNLI dataset and for FC on the FEVER dataset.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
---
|
| 43 |
+
|
| 44 |
---
|