Update README.md

README.md

@@ -21,15 +21,14 @@ Average of 2 Test Runs with 1 point for correct answer, 0.5 point for partial co
 --**Accuracy Score**:  **82.25** correct out of 100  
 --Not Found Classification:  40.0%  
 --Boolean:  61.25%  
---Math/Logic:  8.75%
+--Math/Logic:  8.75%  
 --Complex Questions (1-5):  1 (Low)  
 --Summarization Quality (1-5):  2 (Coherent, extractive)  
 --Hallucinations:  No hallucinations observed in test runs.  
 
 For test run results (and good indicator of target use cases), please see the files ("core_rag_test" and "answer_sheet" in this repo).
 
---As a reference point, this model shows substantial improvements in results, compared with the BLING 1.0B Pythia, with fine-tuning and the base training substantially the same.  
---The model's ability to follow instructions and answer detailed questions improves dramatically from 1.0B -> 1.4B parameters.
+--As a reference point, this model shows substantial improvements in results, compared with the BLING 1.0B Pythia, with fine-tuning and the base training substantially the same.  The model's ability to follow instructions and answer detailed questions improves dramatically from 1.0B -> 1.4B parameters.
 
 
 ### Model Description