Upload MODEL_CARD.md with huggingface_hub
Browse files- MODEL_CARD.md +243 -0
MODEL_CARD.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
language: en
|
| 3 |
+
license: mit
|
| 4 |
+
tags:
|
| 5 |
+
- text-classification
|
| 6 |
+
- code-quality
|
| 7 |
+
- documentation
|
| 8 |
+
- code-comments
|
| 9 |
+
- developer-tools
|
| 10 |
+
datasets:
|
| 11 |
+
- synthetic
|
| 12 |
+
metrics:
|
| 13 |
+
- accuracy
|
| 14 |
+
- f1
|
| 15 |
+
- precision
|
| 16 |
+
- recall
|
| 17 |
+
widget:
|
| 18 |
+
- text: "This function calculates the Fibonacci sequence using dynamic programming to avoid redundant calculations. Time complexity: O(n), Space complexity: O(n)"
|
| 19 |
+
example_title: "Excellent Comment"
|
| 20 |
+
- text: "Calculates the sum of two numbers and returns the result"
|
| 21 |
+
example_title: "Helpful Comment"
|
| 22 |
+
- text: "does stuff with numbers"
|
| 23 |
+
example_title: "Unclear Comment"
|
| 24 |
+
- text: "DEPRECATED: Use calculate_new() instead. This method will be removed in v2.0"
|
| 25 |
+
example_title: "Outdated Comment"
|
| 26 |
+
---
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
# Code Comment Quality Classifier 🔍
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
## Model Description
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
This model automatically classifies code comments into four quality categories to help improve code documentation and review processes. It's designed to assist developers in maintaining high-quality code documentation by identifying comments that may need improvement.
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
**Categories:**
|
| 35 |
+
- 🌟 **Excellent**: Clear, comprehensive, and highly informative comments that explain the "why" and "how"
|
| 36 |
+
- ✅ **Helpful**: Good comments that add value but could be more detailed
|
| 37 |
+
- ⚠️ **Unclear**: Vague or confusing comments that don't provide sufficient information
|
| 38 |
+
- 🚫 **Outdated**: Comments that may no longer reflect the current code or are marked as deprecated
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
## Intended Uses
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
### Primary Use Cases
|
| 43 |
+
- **Code Review Automation**: Automatically flag low-quality comments during pull request reviews
|
| 44 |
+
- **Documentation Quality Audits**: Scan codebases to identify areas needing documentation improvements
|
| 45 |
+
- **Developer Education**: Help developers learn what constitutes good code comments
|
| 46 |
+
- **IDE Integration**: Provide real-time feedback on comment quality while coding
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
### Out-of-Scope Use Cases
|
| 49 |
+
- Generating new comments (this is a classification model, not a generation model)
|
| 50 |
+
- Evaluating code quality (only evaluates comments, not the code itself)
|
| 51 |
+
- Security analysis or vulnerability detection
|
| 52 |
+
- Production-critical decision making without human review
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## How to Use
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
### Quick Start
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
```python
|
| 59 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
|
| 60 |
+
import torch
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
# Load model and tokenizer
|
| 63 |
+
model_name = "Snaseem2026/code-comment-classifier"
|
| 64 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
|
| 65 |
+
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(model_name)
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
# Classify a comment
|
| 68 |
+
comment = "This function calculates fibonacci numbers using dynamic programming"
|
| 69 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(comment, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=512)
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 72 |
+
outputs = model(**inputs)
|
| 73 |
+
predictions = torch.nn.functional.softmax(outputs.logits, dim=-1)
|
| 74 |
+
predicted_class = torch.argmax(predictions, dim=-1).item()
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
labels = ["excellent", "helpful", "unclear", "outdated"]
|
| 77 |
+
print(f"Comment quality: {labels[predicted_class]}")
|
| 78 |
+
```
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
### Batch Processing
|
| 81 |
+
|
| 82 |
+
```python
|
| 83 |
+
comments = [
|
| 84 |
+
"Handles user authentication and session management",
|
| 85 |
+
"does stuff",
|
| 86 |
+
"TODO: fix this later"
|
| 87 |
+
]
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
inputs = tokenizer(comments, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True,
|
| 90 |
+
padding=True, max_length=512)
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 93 |
+
outputs = model(**inputs)
|
| 94 |
+
predictions = torch.argmax(outputs.logits, dim=-1)
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
for comment, pred in zip(comments, predictions):
|
| 97 |
+
print(f"{comment}: {labels[pred.item()]}")
|
| 98 |
+
```
|
| 99 |
+
|
| 100 |
+
## Training Data
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
### Dataset
|
| 103 |
+
The model was trained on a synthetic dataset of code comments carefully crafted to represent the four quality categories. The training data consists of:
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
- **Total samples**: ~1,000 comments
|
| 106 |
+
- **Distribution**: Balanced across all four categories
|
| 107 |
+
- **Language**: English code comments
|
| 108 |
+
- **Sources**: Synthetic data based on common patterns in real-world code comments
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
### Data Creation
|
| 111 |
+
The synthetic dataset was created by:
|
| 112 |
+
1. Identifying common patterns in high-quality and low-quality code comments
|
| 113 |
+
2. Generating representative examples for each category
|
| 114 |
+
3. Creating variations to increase diversity
|
| 115 |
+
4. Ensuring balanced representation across all classes
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
**Note**: This model was trained on synthetic data. For production use, consider fine-tuning on domain-specific comments from your codebase.
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
## Training Procedure
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
### Preprocessing
|
| 122 |
+
- Text tokenization using DistilBERT tokenizer
|
| 123 |
+
- Maximum sequence length: 512 tokens
|
| 124 |
+
- Truncation and padding applied
|
| 125 |
+
|
| 126 |
+
### Training Hyperparameters
|
| 127 |
+
|
| 128 |
+
```yaml
|
| 129 |
+
- Base Model: distilbert-base-uncased
|
| 130 |
+
- Training Epochs: 3
|
| 131 |
+
- Batch Size: 16 (train), 32 (eval)
|
| 132 |
+
- Learning Rate: 2e-5
|
| 133 |
+
- Weight Decay: 0.01
|
| 134 |
+
- Warmup Steps: 500
|
| 135 |
+
- Optimizer: AdamW
|
| 136 |
+
```
|
| 137 |
+
|
| 138 |
+
### Training Infrastructure
|
| 139 |
+
- Framework: Hugging Face Transformers
|
| 140 |
+
- Hardware: CPU/GPU compatible
|
| 141 |
+
- Training Time: ~10-30 minutes (depending on hardware)
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
## Evaluation Results
|
| 144 |
+
|
| 145 |
+
### Metrics
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
The model achieves the following performance on the test set:
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
| Metric | Score |
|
| 150 |
+
|--------|-------|
|
| 151 |
+
| Accuracy | 0.9485 (94.85%) |
|
| 152 |
+
| Precision (weighted) | 0.9535 (95.35%) |
|
| 153 |
+
| Recall (weighted) | 0.9485 (94.85%) |
|
| 154 |
+
| F1 Score (weighted) | 0.9468 (94.68%) |
|
| 155 |
+
|
| 156 |
+
### Per-Class Performance
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
| Class | Precision | Recall | F1-Score |
|
| 159 |
+
|-------|-----------|--------|----------|
|
| 160 |
+
| Excellent | 1.0000 (100%) | 1.0000 (100%) | 1.0000 (100%) |
|
| 161 |
+
| Helpful | 0.8889 (88.9%) | 1.0000 (100%) | 0.9412 (94.1%) |
|
| 162 |
+
| Unclear | 1.0000 (100%) | 0.7917 (79.2%) | 0.8837 (88.4%) |
|
| 163 |
+
| Outdated | 0.9231 (92.3%) | 1.0000 (100%) | 0.9600 (96.0%) |
|
| 164 |
+
|
| 165 |
+
### Key Findings
|
| 166 |
+
- ✨ **Perfect classification** of excellent comments (100% precision & recall)
|
| 167 |
+
- 🎯 **Zero false negatives** for helpful and outdated comments
|
| 168 |
+
- ⚠️ Slight challenge distinguishing unclear comments from other categories
|
| 169 |
+
- 📊 Strong overall performance with 94.85% accuracy
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 172 |
+
|
| 173 |
+
### Known Limitations
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
1. **Synthetic Training Data**: The model was trained on synthetic data and may not capture all nuances of real-world code comments
|
| 176 |
+
2. **Language**: Only trained on English comments
|
| 177 |
+
3. **Context**: Evaluates comments in isolation without code context
|
| 178 |
+
4. **Domain**: May perform differently on specialized domains (e.g., scientific computing, embedded systems)
|
| 179 |
+
5. **Subjectivity**: Comment quality can be subjective; the model reflects patterns in the training data
|
| 180 |
+
|
| 181 |
+
### Recommendations
|
| 182 |
+
|
| 183 |
+
- Use as a supplementary tool, not a replacement for human review
|
| 184 |
+
- Fine-tune on domain-specific data for better performance
|
| 185 |
+
- Validate predictions in your specific use case
|
| 186 |
+
- Combine with other code quality tools for comprehensive analysis
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
## Bias and Fairness
|
| 189 |
+
|
| 190 |
+
### Potential Biases
|
| 191 |
+
|
| 192 |
+
- **Style Bias**: May favor certain commenting styles over others
|
| 193 |
+
- **Verbosity Bias**: Longer comments may be rated higher regardless of actual quality
|
| 194 |
+
- **Pattern Bias**: Trained on specific patterns that may not represent all commenting approaches
|
| 195 |
+
|
| 196 |
+
### Mitigation Strategies
|
| 197 |
+
|
| 198 |
+
- Train on diverse comment styles
|
| 199 |
+
- Regular evaluation on real-world data
|
| 200 |
+
- User feedback integration
|
| 201 |
+
- Continuous model improvement
|
| 202 |
+
|
| 203 |
+
## Environmental Impact
|
| 204 |
+
|
| 205 |
+
- **Base Model**: DistilBERT (~66M parameters)
|
| 206 |
+
- **Carbon Footprint**: Minimal for training on small synthetic dataset
|
| 207 |
+
- **Inference**: Efficient, suitable for real-time applications
|
| 208 |
+
|
| 209 |
+
## Citation
|
| 210 |
+
|
| 211 |
+
If you use this model in your research or application, please cite:
|
| 212 |
+
|
| 213 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 214 |
+
@misc{code-comment-classifier-2026,
|
| 215 |
+
author = {Naseem, Sharyar},
|
| 216 |
+
title = {Code Comment Quality Classifier},
|
| 217 |
+
year = {2026},
|
| 218 |
+
publisher = {Hugging Face},
|
| 219 |
+
howpublished = {\url{https://huggingface.co/Snaseem2026/code-comment-classifier}}
|
| 220 |
+
}
|
| 221 |
+
```
|
| 222 |
+
|
| 223 |
+
## Model Card Authors
|
| 224 |
+
|
| 225 |
+
- Sharyar Naseem (@Snaseem2026)
|
| 226 |
+
|
| 227 |
+
## Model Card Contact
|
| 228 |
+
|
| 229 |
+
For questions or feedback, please open an issue on the model's discussion tab or contact via Hugging Face.
|
| 230 |
+
|
| 231 |
+
## License
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
MIT License - See [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.
|
| 234 |
+
|
| 235 |
+
## Acknowledgments
|
| 236 |
+
|
| 237 |
+
- Built with [Hugging Face Transformers](https://huggingface.co/transformers/)
|
| 238 |
+
- Base model: [DistilBERT](https://huggingface.co/distilbert-base-uncased) by Hugging Face
|
| 239 |
+
- Inspired by the need for better code documentation practices
|
| 240 |
+
|
| 241 |
+
---
|
| 242 |
+
|
| 243 |
+
**Disclaimer**: This model is provided for educational and productivity purposes. Always apply human judgment when evaluating code quality and documentation.
|