Hugging Face's logo

Datasets:
notesbymuneeb
/
epstein-emails

Tasks:
Text Classification
Text Generation
Question Answering
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
parquet
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
Tags:
text
email
legal
parquet
structured-data
datasets
Libraries:
Datasets
pandas
License:
Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
2
Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
thread_id
stringlengths
37
43
source_file
stringlengths
35
37
subject
stringlengths
0
231
⌀
messages
stringlengths
88
34.9k
message_count
int64
1
42
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt_2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 5:29 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "is it a coincidence that the russian that bought the house in palm beach and knows all , is the same guy that \nsold a painting last year to mbs for 450 million dollars. that was only worth 1. 5m?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 5:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "So MBS was paying him off? Why? Ideas?"}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2019 9:34:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "maybe as a favor to trump. in exchange for yemen and iran support. . smells doesnt it?"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt_12
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "____________________ the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, \" he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <:MM11>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as \"reported fact.\" Problem with Mi=story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <_____________________________>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "talk then"}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt_14
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025190.txt
Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Pardon the formality below - I want to approach your very legitimate questions / concerns in a serious manner.\n\nAttached and below the same.\n\nDear Jeffrey:\n\nAs requested, the following addresses your two questions / concerns about our proposed Closer To Truth TV series \"The Science of Sleep and Dreams\":\n\n(i) Have there been sufficient breakthroughs in Sleep and Dreams (significantly beyond traditional understandings) to justify a major TV series?\n(ii) Even if 'yes' to (i), is now the proper time for such a foundational series, or are more years needed for corroborative studies and further research to solidify the breakthroughs?\n\nIn preparing this response, my primary source is Professor Patrick McNamara, Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, with whom CTT Producer/Director Peter Getzels and I spoke with at length today. Patrick is one of the leading sleep and dream researchers (he himself more dreams). More importantly, he is perhaps the leading chronicler of the field, with many publications (including 26 entries in related encyclopedias). He is co-editor-in-chief of the \"Encyclopedia of Sleep and Dreams\" (2012) and the sole author of the forthcoming \"An Introduction to the Neuroscience of Sleep and Dreams\" (Cambridge University Press, 2018), which intends to present the latest science and to become a main textbook for graduate courses/seminars. Patrick is a CTT contributor and colleague.\n\nWhen we asked Patrick, his first response — \"This is the ideal time to tell the sleep-and-dreams story\" — and he cited (in essence) your two questions, in that (i) the multiple breakthroughs are now sufficiently well corroborated by numerous independent labs such that a substantial foundation for the new, deeper understanding of sleep and dreams is now for the first time (over the past few years) confirmed and established, and (ii) there are now interesting application and critical clinical questions to pose, explore and pursue, such as for the treatment of various mental-related illnesses that have known sleep-related syndromes (e.g., PTSD and Depression).\n\nTo understand the significance of recent breakthroughs, a defining characteristic of sleep and dreams is that there are two distinct kinds of sleep — REM (rapid-eye-movement) Sleep and NREM (non-rapid-eye-movement) Sleep. Most dreams are associated with REM sleep (though complex). The eye movement gives the eponymous name, but a more important designation defines the two stages in terms of brain waves (electroencephalograph — EEG): REM is Fast-Wave Sleep (similar to the waking state) and NREM Sleep is Slow-Wave Sleep (very different from the waking state). This difference between REM and NREM sleep has been known since 1953 (different EEGs since 1937), but its deep significance has only been discovered and confirmed in very recent years (as explained below).\n\nFollowing are the key areas of breakthrough in sleep and dreams (from Patrick). Patrick states that these are now reproducible, non-controversial, and well-accepted among experts, although still not appreciated by the public - hence the high value of our CTT TV series. The organizing idea is why and how are sleep and dreams essential for normal memory consolidation and bodily health / well-being.\n\nMemory Consolidation. There is a fundamental difference between REM and NREM Sleep for memory consolidation: REM is for emotional memories, whereas NREM is for declarative and procedural memories. Hence, understanding and dealing with REM emotional memories can lead to treatment for the many neuropsychiatric illnesses that have sleep/dream-related disorders or syndromes (Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, Substance Abuse, many sleep disorders such as Nightmare Disorder, etc., in addition to PTSD and Depression). Research shows bi-directional causality between neuropsychiatric disorders and sleep disorders. This is a superb example of how fundamental science breakthroughs lead to clinical breakthroughs. This fact that REM is associated with emotional memories is nicely consistent with the apparent psychotic nature of dreams, because in REM Sleep the frontal cortex is 'down-regulated' (and the frontal cortex is associated with rational planning, reflection, controlling impulses), while in REM Sleep the limbic system is 'up-regulated\" (and the limbic system is associated with emotions and feelings) — see Neuroimaging below. This is why dream states flood the ego with emotional fantasies without rational control. However, it is also true that the limbic system enables creative ideas, thus grounding in science the long-suspected idea that sleep and dreams can enhance creativity.\n\nAs Dr. Robert Stickgold, our other advisor"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Lawrence Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 4:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "is it a charity that received the funding?"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Feb 15, 2017, at 1:29 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "501 (c) (3) - private operating foundation - The Kuhn Foundation, which I set up in 1999 to support Closer To Truth. IRS letter attached.\n\nThank you."}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Hi: Just returned from a month in China. Attached is my summary of recent politics (in South China Morning Post), and pics of moderating (at request of govts of China and Israel) the PM's discussion with leading Chinese technologist (Baidu CEO, dominant Chinese search engine). The PM was in China for 25th anniversary of diplomatic relations\n\nBack to CTT, my 'true love'... Love to discuss Science of Sleep & Dreams project. I'm in LA for week and then NY April 8-18.\n\nWarm regards, Robert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Robert Kuhn"], "timestamp": "Mar 23, 2017, at 4:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Look forward to seeing you"}, {"sender": "Robert Kuhn <11=1>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 2:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": "Just arrived NY, here for —10 days.\nNow with the Trump-Xi Summit over (utterly overwhelmed by Syria strike), back to Closer To Truth.\n\nWhen good to meet?\n\nRobert"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "4/8/2017 9:46:30 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Kuhn - The Science of Sleep and Dreams", "body": ""}]
7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt_18
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt
Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["BS Stern"], "timestamp": "Thursday, August 9 2018 10:47 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Our May conversation - more thoughts", "body": "Hi all — \n\nI spent some time mulling additional aspects of a third choice presidential run and wanted to run five specific attributes for a candidate by you as a group. \nThis much we know - the Fall elections are shaping up to be a referendum on the most divisive American President in memory. The battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination this fall will only amplify the polarity of the political debate that is already deeply overwrought on both sides. The rising tide of pressure on Donald Trump from the Mueller investigation shows no sign of ebbing. \nUnless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these unprecedented events will still leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield of the 2016 Presidential election. Watching these unrelenting, compounding events since our discussion in May, I am guessing we are all asking the same question: now what? For the 48 percent of Americans who believe Donald Trump should not be in the White House, perhaps we too want our own \"chaos\" candidate in 2020? \nShould Trump run again, this could be a \"break glass\" moment for the majority of Americans who don't support him. Do we want to break the genteel precedents of two parties running their ceremonious and seemingly illogical nominating process to select a candidate? (Why do Iowa and New Hampshire play such outsized roles? What kind of small-d democratic process relies on superdelegates?) The system failed in 2016, with both parties producing terribly flawed candidates in a race to the bottom. We need to build a back-up plan in the event the system fails again. \nIt's possible, of course, that we won't need a third-party candidate. Trump could decide not to run for whatever reason. The Democrats could nominate a winning 2020 candidate. I am not willing to take those bets. \nThe ideal candidate for a new third party is someone who is widely perceived to be that rare combination of both good and great. We are looking for a proven leader of men and women, someone with clear, democratic — and moral — values that reflect the best of America, not our worst. We know people like this on the national stage now. \nAs a thought experiment, consider the possibilities of a ticket outside the partisan lanes and imagine the chemistry of radical combinations: Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich? \nAs we have discussed narrow path to electing the first president outside the two major party primary system in 168 years is more navigable than most think. Heading into 2020, converging trends in American's demands for a third party (a historic high of 61%), disapproval of Donald Trump holding steady above 50%, and the increasingly leftward drift of the Democratic Party suggest that electorate may be susceptible to merits of a new centrist party. Cynics will say that the structural impediments of ballot and presidential debate access, the overwhelming advantages of legacy parties' fundraising and voter turn-out operations preordain failure, but they're wrong; the legal and logistical hurdles are amenable to a combination of lawyering and resources. The bigger, more consequential factors come in terms of candidate quality and policy. I believe a candidate with five specific characteristics including a unique — and purposefully non-specific - policy agenda could limbo a win. \n• This is what I think a successful third-party candidate looks like; a dream third party ticket would start off with enough name ID to be an instant contender. Building the name ID to run nationally is just too long and expensive of a process to accomplish in the 28 months until the next presidential election. We can't beat a celebrity without some celebrity of our own, whether from politics, sports, business, or entertainment. Instantaneous name ID is so crucial because the candidate must start out in striking distance in any three-way poll against Trump and a fill-in-the-blank Democratic flavor-of-the day candidate. The media and political class will predetermine irrelevance otherwise. \n• A Democrat-leaning candidate would have to top the ideal third-party ticket. We need someone with a shot at snaking a plurality of the vote in the blue states Hillary Clinton won (227 electoral votes), but moderate enough to win a plurality in some combination of Trump states like Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan (another 119 votes). The right candidate may even to put North Carolina, Ohio, Indiana in play for a centrist bi-partisan ticket as well (totaling an electoral sweep of 464 elector votes). A right leaning candidate would meet the same fate as a primary challenger to Trump — for all intents and purposes we need to assume that 36% of voters won't be cleaved from Trump under any circumstances and run to win around them. The deep red states would be off the table entirely. \n• With the Trump reality show airing daily, voters are now expecting to take their politics with a side of entertainment. Heretofore, ratings will matter no matter how dry the policy topic. Surely Stephen Colbert would gladly sacrifice his executive producer Chris Licht to produce a daily comedic segment of this dream candidate interviewing Americans in truck stops and McDonald's across the country. A few of the \"Saturday Night Live\" script writers could certainly be enticed to disguise serious debates as informative amusement. Any candidate must be committed to a near daily cadence of high quality, compelling video production. It will be especially crucial to keep the voters' attention during what will be a raucous Democratic primary season. Rules governing access to the general election debate stage dictate that a candidate enjoy support of at least 15% of voters in the months leading up to the general election. \n• This dream candidate would pledge to serve only four years and address all of the U.S.'s ticking time bombs like Social Security, Medicare, health care reform, climate change, money in politics, gerrymandering, and infrastructure investment in a single term. This one-and-done term decouples our candidate from the usual politics and gives them the power of promise and deliver decisive action. A four-year term pledge ensures governance independent of campaign finance concerns and narrow special interests inherent to winning re-election. This \"fix-it\" ticket would promise to force decisions on all the underlying structural policy matters damaging America's long-term prospects and distorting our democracy. No more kicking the can down the road. \n• This candidate should also pledge to push for laws passed that reflect the will of simple majorities in Congress. Congress now only allows bills to move forward when a \"majority of a majority\" supports the policy and on many levels seems fundamentally broken. This third-party president could force votes based on a transparent reading of where the votes lie via coalition building. The Senate filibuster power will present a high hurdle, but a third-party candidate would be a de facto disruptor of the two-party system. Party discipline could well break down, and moderates in both parties could form a powerful, decisive block willing to work with the new President. The policies passed into law may not be ideal for either Democrats or Republicans, but for the major agenda items that must be addressed for America's long-term health, an imperfect fix that corrects course is better than those that now have us hurtling toward national bankruptcy. \nAnd if no candidate secures 270 electoral votes in 2020? The House of Representatives would choose the next president. In 2016, reports suggested Michael Bloomberg declined to run on a third-party ticket for fear of splitting support from Hillary Clinton and throwing the election to a GOP-controlled House of Representatives who would then vote to select the president. The fear was the GOP controlled House would have just elected Trump. \nWould Democratic control of the House mean that the House would pick an alternative to Trump as president? Each state delegation has a single vote in selecting a president and it is the incoming Congress - the class elected in 2020 that would decide the election. But no matter which party has the speaker's chair, the GOP would almost certainly have the upper hand in the majority of state delegations controlled. Would the state delegations pick a president based on party majority control of the delegation, the winner of the popular vote in each state or their own calculations as to who is best for America? Precedent suggests that delegations use secret ballots, which means individual lawmakers may vote their consciences. \nIf we recruit this ideal candidate; threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV- savvy campaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda, money and campaign expertise would certainly follow. And 50 state ballot access is a function of time (starting in the fall of 2019 would be prudential) and hard work as we have discussed and many of you have exhaustively war-gamed. \nPart and parcel of this effort would be motivating the often politically lackadaisical middle to vote. The raft of new technologies in data targeting and biometric mobile voting technology could transform the electorate in the next few, amping voter participation and injecting the voices of moderates (both in political views and level of political interest) into the process. And any third-party effort must incorporate advocacy for accelerated adaption of these all but inevitable voter verification tools. I believe Silicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort. \nI am sure none of us doubt that chaos could potentially be unleashed by jamming three viable candidates into a two-party system. An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, murky and ancient process. But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to nominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020? \nI look forward to talking more about all of our ideas on this hopeful project in coming weeks. Please feel free to call me to discuss. Thank you for taking time to review this note. \n\nSincerely,"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt_19
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032654.txt
Re: Marilyn
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 4:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "at the moment we will go to lsh on sunday the 26th early then to new york where i will stay the week, larry , it will be assayay and I, trump is in town that week,"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:37 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Will you want to bring back Marilyn or Carluz/Arline for the week you are in NY?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 16, 2017, at 6:47 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "marilyn"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "Reminder: Jojo and Merwin both requested off Nov. 25 and 26 to be with family in town and celebrate Brianna's 16th Birthday. We will need to bring Marilyn to NY to help prepare for your arrival. We should have Sonam and Leo to help as well. Shall we get a flight for Marilyn early Sat. Nov. 25th morning?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 6:54 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "i will show up at aroudn 11 pm sunday so plenty of time"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:56 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "OK,...and are you OK with Larry getting you a car to take you to 71st upon landing at Teterboro on No. 26th?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "Nov 17, 2017, at 7:06 AM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "what apt is Mt. staying in. call david mitchell, put her at the life hotel instead, for tonight if they have room."}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/17/2017 12:17:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Marilyn", "body": "I had in apartment 3M. I will ask David about a room for tonight instead"}]
8
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt_21
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029972.txt
null
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2015 6:48:37 PM", "subject": null, "body": "below from \nHi Lesley, \nI'm helping a friend at the doctors and should be available between 5 and 630p if we can talk then. Or anytime \ntomorrow before 5pm. Going to Trump speech tomorrow night - think he's going to get the nomination.... \nBest,"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt_28
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033196.txt
Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses
[{"sender": "Richard Kahr", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/21/2016 8:29:50 AM", "subject": "Cozen O'Connor - 7 Ways the Trump Administration Will Affect Businesses", "body": "https://www.cozen.com/cozendocs/7-Trump-Administration-Policies-Affecting-Businesses/#_home"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt_45
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033238.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/25/2017 1:02:58 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Reid mentioned along with Ted Olson, one or two others as potential add'I lawyers for Trump in today's Law 360"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt_46
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030589.txt
Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
[{"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmaxlgellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow. My telephone numbers are or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1.______________________says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein and directed to copy her.\n\nPlease respond to these allegations and all others in the original Jane Doe 102 complaint.\n\n2. Ms Maxwell took part in numerous other sexual encounters involving her assistant and Mr Epstein.\n\n3. Ms Maxwell kept sex toys and costumes in the Palm Beach mansion and dressed prior to sex sessions with Mr Epstein. S Maxwell herself wore black vinyl during sex sessions with Mr Epstein.\n\n4. men.\n\nwas paid between US $200 and $ 5000 US sex, depending on whether it involved travel and other\n\n5, was required to have sex with friends of Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein, including Glenn Dubin, Les Wexner, Ehud Barak, former Senator George Mitchell and Stephen Kosslyn.\n\n6. Ms Maxwell introduced to Prince Andrew in 2001 at Ms Maxwell's London house where had sex with him. subsequently was directed to meet him at Mr Epstein's New York house where Ms Maxwell directed to sit on Andrew's knee with_______________ Andrew groped both girls. Ms Maxwell directed after this to have sex with Andrew.\n\nMs Maxwell and Mr Epstein subsequently travelled with to Little St James where she was directed to stage an orgy for Andrew and Mr Epstein during which she performed oral sex on them.\n\n7. was paid extra by Mr Epstein or his employees for these sexual encounters.\n\n8. Ms Maxwell knew age and laughed about it when she introduced her to Andrew.\n\n9. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein tried to persuade to bear his child.\n\n10. After sexual encounters with male friends of Mr Epstein and/or Ms Maxwell, Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein would ask explicit questions about what went on.\n\n11. Mr Epstein's residences in Florida and New York had surveillance cameras that taped the sex sessions and taped even in the bathroom.\n\n12. Ms Maxwell and Mr Epstein arranged for Ehud Barak to have sex with several girls, often at Mr Epstein's Palm Beach house.\n\n13. Ms Maxwell r.ited President Bill Clinton in a helicopter to a dinner on Little St James where two brunettes Ms Maxwell, and Mr Epstein were at the table.\n\n14. Mr Epstein bought Ms Maxwell the helicopter, homes in New York and London and a Mercedes."}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmaxl@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Jay Lefkowitz"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4 2011 04:31 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt_50
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031697.txt
Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jefffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/23/2011 7:42:56 PM", "subject": "Fwd: 1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Begin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Mark Green", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 23, 2011 3:37:46 PM EDT", "subject": "1st Anniversary show today -- Both Sides Now w/ Huffington & Matalin", "body": "Dear Friend, \n\nBoth Sides Now w/Huffington & Matalin celebrates its 1st anniversary this week. As the \nonly 2 sides/2 women show on national radio, we've grown from 16 stations in May of \n2010 to 110 now. \n\nArianna and Mary find consensus that, contrary to the Washington and media \nconventional wisdom, the Jobs Agenda is more urgent than the Deficit Agenda (\"if people \nonly read about shark attacks, they'll worry about shark attacks,\" says Arianna). And they \nagree that there's an apparent outbreak of men abusing the help -- Strauss-Kahn, \nSchwarzenegger, Ensign. To paraphase Freud, what do men want? \n\nBut there's sharp disagreement about whether Rep. Ryan walked into Obama's trap by \nproposing to end Medicare in 10 years. Will the special election this Tuesday in Jack \nKemp's old seat produce a Democratic \"Scott Brown Moment\"? \n\nTo read the show summary and listen, http://www.huffindtonpost.com/huff-radio/both-\nsides-now-1st-annive b 865325.html \n\nBest, \nMark Green \nHost"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt_53
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025812.txt
Re: Shears Update
[{"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/16/2014 5:56:14 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "yes agree\nresult got worse with recent negative press, clinton, as we discussed\nwe were down to 1 negative (forbes) before that - Christina can confirm this.\nIt will get back to 1 and then 0 so long as negative things stop coming out. if new negative keeps coming out it\nreally dismantles much of our effort... especially when it involves an ex-president\nno excuses here i'm not pleased with where it is at and am still working to make it happen"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 1:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Results still very bad"}, {"sender": "Christina Galbraith", "recipients": ["Tyler Shears"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, July 16, 2014", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Hi Tyler,\nThe social media sites are constantly updated: LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, google +.\nI'll be in touch later today re: feature article.\nCould you put a site map into the Net site.? This helps rankings. Also could you add it to google analytics\nusing Jeffrey's gmail account? This allows me to monitor it's progress and index it periodically.\nI'll call you later. Thanks,\nChristina"}, {"sender": "Tyler Shears", "recipients": ["Christina Galbraith"], "timestamp": "Jul 16, 2014, at 12:01 PM", "subject": "Re: Shears Update", "body": "Christina,\nhttp://jeffreyepstein.net/ - Site is live and Share This shows up when you scroll down page (look for top menu\nbar)\nI expect this to rank swiftly - I'm sending a list of all properties we need to point over in this direction with\nsuggested anchor text.\nDo you have the topic right I'm doing a placement around? I'm going to have a few articles spun-off from it\nand put into lower tier publications as well.\nI want to push HARD in August with a premium placement, fresh link pushes, and some supporting\nplacements. We should be able to get down to 1 negative by mid-September with a goal of being clean by end\nof year (unless new negative press comes again...)\nFor social media updates... Are you currently doing these? I'd like to look at how often we are doing them and\ntrying to link to our own content more often.\nI'm also exploring if we can get this new site included in Google News and maybe syndicate other important\nAl news through it... would give us free google news spots when we need them..\nJE - There's 3 negatives today and that's 3 too many. There will be progress please continue to be patient as\nyou have been.\nBest\nTyler"}]
4
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012689.txt_56
IMAGES-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012689.txt
Oscar diary
[{"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": ["Stephanie"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 6:12 PM", "subject": "Oscar diary", "body": "grueling work have finally paid off. King George VI and Harvey Weinstein now share the journey of a single man who triumphs over adversity.\n\nThe Governor’s ball, held above the Kodak Theater, recreates the Mocambo-Ciro’s niteries of the 1930’s and 40’s, using a palette of teal and white. Three bands alternate musical styles as hungry guests wolf down wolfgang Puck’s delicious food. The winners triumphantly sachet around the room holding their heavy eight pound gold statues.\n\nAn hour later there is a migration to the famous Vanity Fair party hosted by Graydon Carter at the Sunset Tower Hotel owned by Jeff Klein. One celebrity after another poses in front of the green hedge standing in the middle of the circular Vanity Fair logo to record their devotion and support to Graydon and the magazine.\n\nThere’s a hierarchy of arrival times. The inner circle of Graydon’s 150 best friends attend a seated dinner and viewing of the show at 5pm. They include Barry Diller and Diane Von Furstenberg, Francis Ford Coppola, Jon Hamm and Jennifer westfeldt, Betsey Bloomingdale, Tory Burch and Lyor Cohen, Tom Ford, Sandy Gallin, Mitch Glazer and Kelly Lynch, Carolina and Reinaldo Herrera, L’Wren Scott and Sir Mick Jagger, Naomi Watts and Live Schreiber, Wendi Stark, Judd Apatow, Jackie and Joan Collins, George Hammilton, Donna Karan and Steve Martin.\n\nThe best and the brightest talent in town arrive at 9pm. They are Justin Bieber and his date Selena Gomez, Andrew Garfield, Jude Law, Vera Farmiga, Armie Hammer, Jennifer Lawrence, Kevin Spacey, Charlize Theron, Anne Hathaway, Hailee Steinfield,Taylor Hackford and Helen Mirren, Scarlett Johansson, Michelle williams, Isla Fischer and Sasha Baron Cohen, Jane Fonda after her play, “33 Variations”, Melania and Donald Trump whom I introduce to David 0. Russell as The Trumpster gushes about “The Fighter”. Donald offers me a ride home on his plane. He is leaving in ten minutes. Too bad James Franco didn’t know because he is presently sitting on a commercial flight back to school, skipping his own after party. Social standings of the rest of the guests are determined by half hour increments. Every other person previously mentioned in the story is here. VF’s Beth Kseniak and Matt Ullian tell me the list is cut down to 800 this year.\n\nAt 11:30pm there is another celebrity migration up the hill to Madonna manager Guy Oseary’s house. One should note that earlier in the evening Madonna came down the hill to pose in a risqué outfit with daughter Lourdes in front of the green hedge. Madonna and co-host Demi Moore are able to lure the créme de la créme with the promise of fabulous music, dancing and no cameras. Those reported on their dance floor include Ryan Phillippe with Amanda Syedfried, who were making out all night and Phillippe’s ex-wife Reese Witherspoon and new fiancé Jim Toth. They pregnant Natalie Portman and choreographer Benjamin Millepied, Mick Jagger, Tom Hanks, Sean Penn, Ralph Feinnes, Mila Kunis, Cameron Diaz, Gwyneth Paltrow and Renee Zellweger and Bradley Cooper boogie til dawn.\n\nA winner’s work is never done. Colin Firth, Tom Hooper and David Seidler show up at 4:30am at The Four Seasons Hotel for a live broadcast on The Today Show with Meredith Vieira. Functioning on an adrenalin rush, they are back at the Kodak Theater with Geoffrey Rush to appear on Oprah’s live broadcast. Leave it to Oprah to get the king’s last words.\n\nSend to jeffrey"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt_57
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033210.txt
Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/3/2017 2:07:16 PM", "subject": "Trump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash/Joe Cinque", "body": "Jeffrey --I thought you might be interested in this article-- Nick \n\nTrump appears with mobster-affiliated felon at New Year's bash \nPresident-elect Donald Trump rang in the new year together with Joseph \"Joey No Socks\" Cinque — a \nconvicted felon with ties to notorious Gambino crime family boss John Gotti, a recently released video has \nrevealed. \nCinque can be seen in a video obtained by the Palm Beach Daily News , cheering loudly as a tuxedo-clad \nTrump runs through a number of campaign promises before the hundreds of guests attending the New Year's \nEve bash the President-elect threw at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida on Saturday. \n\"The taxes are coming down, regulations are coming off, we're going to get rid of Obamacare,\" Trump can be \nheard saying as an exuberant Cinque stands next to him, pumping his fists into the air. \nCinque's Sunday appearance with Trump might raise some eyebrows. \nBeyond a 1989 felony conviction for possessing nearly $100,000 worth of stolen artwork, Cinque \"used to be \nfriends with John Gotti,\" according to a New York Magazine profile from 1995 . \nCinque was also \"shot three times and left for dead\" in a 1980 incident that authorities described as \"a hit,\" \naccording to the profile. \nFurther, Saturday's Mar-a-Lago party was far from the first time Cinque cheered on for Trump. \nAn Associated Press report from this spring showed that the American Academy of Hospitality Sciences, a \ncompany owned and operated by Cinque, has awarded more than a dozen of Trump's golf courses, hotels, \ncasinos and private clubs with so-called \"Star Diamond\" awards \"of true excellence in hospitality.\" \nThe same report also found that about half of the roughly 30 people listed as \"trustees\" to the company are \nTrump friends or business associates. \nTrump, meanwhile, was listed on the company's website as its \"ambassador extraordinaire,\" and he even \nappeared in a 2009 tribute video to Cinque in which he said, \"There's nobody like him. He's a special guy.\" \nBut when asked by reporters about Cinque in May, Trump denied knowing anything about him or his criminal \npast. \n\"If a guy's going to give you an award, you take it,\" the President-elect said at the time. \"You don't tend to look \nup his whole life story.\" \nThe Trump transition team did not immediately return a request for comment on how the President-elect knows \nCinque or why they appeared together Saturday. \nWhile standing alongside Cinque, Trump also took a moment to address the terror attack that left scores of \nnightclub revelers in Istanbul dead over the weekend — and how the bloodbath somehow necessitates a \nMexican border wall. \n\"We will build a wall, you know that. We will build a wall,\" the President-elect told the raucous crowd. \n\"And speaking of walls,\" he continued. \"In Turkey tonight — has anybody heard? Big disaster took place in \nTurkey tonight. Many, many, many people killed...It's a horror show. So we're going to get things running \nproperly.\" \nISIS claimed responsibility for the Saturday attack , which left at least 39 people dead and dozens more \nwounded, calling the lone gunman who carried out the massacre a \"heroic soldier of the caliphate.\" The suspect \nhad yet to be named and located by Turkish authorities early Tuesday. \nThe President-elect made building a wall along the country's southern border one of his main campaign talking \npoints, frequently promising his supporters that it will be a \"great\" and \"beautiful\" wall. \nBut his pledge to construct a border barrier has gone under several renditions, with the President-elect admitting \nin November that it might actually end up \"part wall, part fence.\""}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt_66
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033576.txt
Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["anil.ambani"], "timestamp": "3/30/2017 11:11:37 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "India Israel Key -not for email"}, {"sender": "Anil Ambani <Anil.Ambani", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:02 AM", "subject": "Re: PC - Business standard - Thu. 30 March 2017 : After trump phone call, govt weighs if Modi should visit US early", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\nInfo.\nBR,\nAnil"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt_76
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.txt
Re: Saudi money
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "words that you to refer to one thing, USA. the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer\nvery useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and\ncongress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. | stock market even in\ntech, needs biotech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are\n20k members ofa tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is\nfocused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion\nthat has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with\nwhat you know?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in\nthe secondary market... blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "sorry, no good handle without digging"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in\nseparate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied\nup in lock ups."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "number"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 AM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "10/19/2016 3:13:21 PM", "subject": "Re: Saudi money", "body": "Anew guy for your stable of smart guys. He taught at SAIS in DC where I went in 1989. I was just\ndown there a few weeks ago and was on a panel with him. He is vicious on Bill C's NATO expansion --\nbiggest foreign policy error since WWII. Retiring. Let me know if you want an intro -- Iam sure that\nyour Russian friends would enjoy talking to him. Book well worth reading...\n\n1&keywords=mission+failure"}]
10
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt_92
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033204.txt
Trump's conflict web
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2016 7:43:45 PM", "subject": "Trump's conflict web", "body": "http://therealdeal.com/issues articles/trumps-conflict-web/"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt_98
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031263.txt
Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment
[{"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12/10/17 5:12 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Aldhous", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "Dec 11, 2017, at 9:02 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Since sending the note below, we have heard from the Australian National University. They informed us:\n\n\"The characterisation by Professor Krauss that The Australian National University (ANU) found the complaint to be ‘unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent’ is false.\"\n\nThey also told us that you resigned your honorary appointment at ANU on November 3. Can you comment on the reason for your resignation from ANU?\n\nI would welcome the opportunity to discuss this with you. Again, we are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time. Please provide any comments you wish us to consider before then.\n\nSincerely,\n\nPeter Aldhous"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["Peter"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:34:49 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Hello Peter. Iam currently on a plane. I sent you earlier from the plane an email response to your letter, which IT hope you received. Regarding your note below: My earlier remark to you was based on my correspondence\n\nwith the universities during and after the investigation, and the conclusion I drew from the ANU report, which I quoted for you in my response to your note. The claims made in the allegation which were later demonstrated to be false, or which were then not supported after repeated requests from the University to substantiate the claim,\n\nprovided evidence that the claim was fabricated (as I knew it must be), and therefore maliciously so.\n\nI had been planning on resigning my honorary appointment at ANU before I received the original letter from ANU because my wife had moved to the US several years ago, and I no longer visited the University regularly to work with colleagues there as I did in earlier years. When I received the letter from ANU regarding the complaint, I decided to wait to resign my appointment until the investigation was completed and the complaint was dismissed. After it was, I sent my note of resignation in, and I note that upon its receipt the Dean he suggested I remain on until my appointment expired at the end of this year, but as I had made my decision to resign earlier I felt no need to wait until then. I received a very nice note from the director of the unit I work with (who was made aware of the complaint and its resolution by the Dean) who expressed thanks for my many contributions to the University while there, and my interactions with staff, students, and faculty there.\n\nI hope this clarifies your issues.\n\nLMK"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031288.txt_105
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031288.txt
Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke [darren@indykepllc.com]", "recipients": ["Michael", "Charles"], "timestamp": "Monday, August 15, 2016 5:35 PM", "subject": "Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "Regards,\n\nDarren"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt_111
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "Nov 11, 2016, at 4:49 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not so good"}, {"sender": "Zubair Khan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, 11 November 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Out of 13 states we got 11 right. The ones we got wrong are NY and WI. \nIn the last report, analyzed data was of 3 days in which Clinton got a positive spike after she got clearance \nfrom FBI. However Trump dominated the social media positively if we analyze one week data before starting \ntime of election, monthly data and entire data which we have gathered for months. Based on this we predicted \non our Facebook page on 30th October that Trump will be next president of US. \nOur model works but I think the important question which we failed to answer is that how much historic data \nmust be analyzed to make the right decision. This could have been answered if we had a Data Scientist. Also I \nbelieve its a great tool to track voters and get them to vote. It can be used in French elections next year or \nelections of Brazil in 2018 but unfortunately I have to shut down this project as getting data from Twitter is \nexpensive and the start up is running out of money. \nI am going to focus on cyber security again and will definitely reach out if I have a powerful investable idea. \nRegards, \nZubair Khan"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Zubair Khan"], "timestamp": "11/11/2016 5:29:35 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "New York ? How ? It was hillary no doubt always"}]
3
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt_116
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026161.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jack ANG", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2017 8:48:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You were spot on, Jeffrey!"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Le 10 juil. 2017 a 23:17", "subject": "re trump", "body": "asi said they will first go after his family"}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt_117
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt
Patterson
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In \na sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I \nhave some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll \nsurely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will \namp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've \nencountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Darren Indyke \nPrivileged - Redacted"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt_118
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030238.txt
Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING
[{"sender": "Faith Kates", "recipients": ["Faith Kates"], "timestamp": "8/14/2012 1:05:43 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "John Connolly Ed.D.", "recipients": ["RALPH BERNSTEIN", "Morad Tahbaz"], "timestamp": "August 4, 2012 3:54:25", "subject": "FW: Public wor vs private AMAZING", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ed thompson", "recipients": ["Joseph Bernstein"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 03, 2012 6:03 PM", "subject": "Fw: Public work vs private AMAZING", "body": "There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot.\n\nA recent \"Investor's Business Daily\" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health organization.\n\nPercentage of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:\n\nU.S. 65%\n\nEngland 46%\n\nCanada 42%\n\nPercentage of patients diagnosed with diabetes who received treatment within six months:\n\nU.S. 93%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:\n\nU.S. 90%\n\nEngland 15%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nPercentage referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:\n\nU.S. 77%\n\nEngland 40%\n\nCanada 43%\n\nNumber of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:\n\nU.S. 71\n\nEngland 14\n\nCanada 18\n\nPercentage of seniors (65+), with low income, who say they are in \"excellent health\":\n\nU.S. 12%\n\nEngland 2%\n\nCanada 6%\n\nAnd now for the last statistic:\nNational Health Insurance?\nU.S. NO\nEngland YES\nCanada YES\nCheck this last set of statistics!!\tThe percentage of each past president's cabinet who had worked in the private \tbusiness sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is \ta real-life business, not a government job Here are the percentages.\nT. Roosevelt..................... \t38%\nTaft.................................. \t40%\nWilson ............................. \t52%\nHarding........................... \t49%\nCoolidge.......................... \t48%\nHoover............................ \t42%\nF. Roosevelt.................... \t50%\nTruman............................ \t50%\nEisenhower...................... \t57%\nKennedy.......................... \t30%\nJohnson........................... \t47%\nNixon............................... 53%\nFord................................ 42%\nCarter............................. 32%\nReagan............................ 56%\nGH Bush......................... 51%\nClinton ........................... 39%\nGW Bush........................ 55%\nObama..................... 8%\nThis helps to explain the incompetence of this administration:\nonly 8% of them have ever worked in private business!\nThat's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?\nHow can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government and/or non-profit jobs or as \"community organizers.\" They should have been in an employment line\nPass this on because we'll NEVER see these facts in the main stream media."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt_123
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031126.txt
J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: "Post-election insight: The road ahead"
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "11/6/2012 10:24:50 PM", "subject": "J.P. Morgan exclusive conference call on Thursday, November 8th at 4pm EST: \"Post-election insight: The road ahead\"", "body": "We are pleased to invite you to an exclusive J.P. Morgan Private Bank conference call, “Post-election insights: The road ahead,” on Thursday, November 8 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. \n\nThe call will feature Peter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility for JPMorgan Chase. Peter is an undisputed expert in political matters, having spent nearly a decade in government service as U.S. Special Trade Negotiator and Ambassador in the Clinton administrations. The discussion will take a closer look at the election results, focusing on the political and fiscal implications and what they mean for our clients globally. \n\nThe invitation below contains full details of the event. \n\nYou are invited to participate in an exclusive conference call\n\nPost-election insights: The road ahead \n\nThursday, November 8, 2012 at 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time\n\nHosted by\n\nJohn Duffy, Chief Executive Officer, J.P. Morgan U.S. Private Bank\n\nFeaturing\n\nPeter Scher, Head of Corporate Responsibility, JPMorgan Chase & Co.\n\nAs the new political landscape begins to take shape, join us to hear Peter discuss:\n\n* Global implications of election results \n\n* Impact on regulatory and “fiscal cliff” legislation\n\n* Bipartisanship in the new environment\n\nTO LISTEN TO THE CALL\n\nToll-free: 877.804.2965\n\nInternational Toll: 706.902.2073\n\nConference ID: 68693542"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt_124
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032697.txt
RE: Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@qmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:05 PM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:11 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Internet is crashing right now about this....trump apparently off his rocker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 1:53 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "told you"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 3, 2018 2:01 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Does he have a lawyer? Is he dealing with mueller?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 03, 2018 2:03 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "it also includes barrack, saying not is only donald crazy but hes stupid. SO MCH FUN"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 12:24:49 AM", "subject": "RE: Re: ", "body": "As usual you nailed it....tomorrow will be an interesting day"}]
6
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt_140
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033155.txt
RE: Boeing
[{"sender": "Sean J. Lancaster", "recipients": ["BEE", "jeevacation@gmail.com", "ie"], "timestamp": "4/26/2011 7:28:33 PM", "subject": "RE: Boeing", "body": "I was told it was going for part out by Wendy ? I don’t know this buyer you describe"}, {"sender": "Larry", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\n\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total...\n\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:25 PM", "subject": "Boeing", "body": "Jeffrey and Sean,\n\nI heard Trump has a contract on his B727, no money has changed hands, sold for 2.2M as is,, he needs three engine\noverhaul's in the next 14 months, 600k worth total...\n\nSean may know this guy, he is Indian, I think his name is Shugo or something like that, he is buying the plane and leasing\nit to company in Singapore, FYI info,."}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026328.txt_148
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026328.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/4/2018 1:23:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think it's a useful point, potentially a powerful one. But I don't think anything is going to get attention now. I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case--with it's Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives. WSJ is probably right place."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 7:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "do you think the press would react to the fact that all the settlement money is going to the attorney and none to the girls.? react to the fact that the case was settled but the lawyers wanted to trumpet their success."}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt_152
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027036.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:50 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "does the 23 work in cambridge"}, {"sender": "Lisa New <lisanew@harvard.edu>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Absolutely. 23rd is great. I teach my seminar that day at 1 but could tape in the morning or after class--in my office (very private), or at the Harvardx studios (less) or in the Woodberry poetry room (the nicest place). . If Woody wanted, we could bring some students into the taping or just do the two of us... Woody is absolutely welcome to come to the seminar, of course John McCain, Tony Kushner, Al Gore have all signed on the last 2 days...crazy"}, {"sender": "Lisa New", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/5/2013 7:26:32 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Or we could do the taping at my house. That would be totally delightful too"}]
3
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021216.txt_158
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021216.txt
Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners
[{"sender": "The Sidney Hillman Foundation", "recipients": ["Michael"], "timestamp": "Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 2:45 PM", "subject": "Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Congratulations to the 2019 Hillman Prize recipients!"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Apr 23, 2019, at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Another big prize for Miami Herald."}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff [is |", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/23/2019 12:57:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Announcing the 2019 Hillman Prize winners", "body": "Pile on"}]
3
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt_176
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026514.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Why had no one interviewed some of trump classmates at wharton ? Deutsh bank papers very bery bad"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff <michaelwolff@...>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, May 22, 2019 at 8:24 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Where are you tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/23/2019 12:53:04 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Home"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt_182
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032873.txt
Fwd: The book on you...
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 4:37:29 PM", "subject": "Fwd: The book on you...", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr. <landon.thomas@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Darren lndyke"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:54 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "everyone except the NYT it seems:) yes or no question: does he win?"}, {"sender": "Story <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:47 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "every day"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2016, at 11:46 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "are you still getting calls from reporters re Trump?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:28 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Landon Thomas, Jr.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in your relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he had been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been manufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that is what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you. He actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with him. I think he is close to finishing up. Did you ever speak to him?"}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt_187
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026466.txt
Re: Keep the March Alive!
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "1/24/2018 11:35:28 AM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "happy to help. but I thought by colorful past might be more of a burden with re conribtuions."}, {"sender": "Diane Ziman", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "Jeffrey --\nDid you see my son's email on Sunday?"}, {"sender": "Philip Levine", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Keep the March Alive!", "body": "I spent the day with thousands of fellow Floridians, celebrating the one year anniversary of the Women's March.\nI was inspired by the crowds, their voice, and their passion.\nEmpowering women in the age of Trump is an essential part of moving this country forward. But that means moving forward on issues that have long been stalled - equal pay, better education, and a living wage.\nIn 2018, we have the chance to move these issues forward, and I'm asking for your help in makincit happen.\nIf the crowds we saw in St. Petersburg, Miami, and dozens of other cities across this country are any indication, we have the momentum!\nNow we need to bring it to Tallahassee.\nSincerely,\nPhilip"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt_200
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033169.txt
humor and trump and evolutionary logic
[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["Ej 2cvacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "9/26/2016 8:59:46 PM", "subject": "humor and trump and evolutionary logic", "body": "was pleased that Robert Lynch's work and my own were cited in a Nation\narticle on the lack of humor of our Republican standard bearer\n\nhttps: //ww. thenation.com/article/have-you-ever-seen-donald-trump-]laugh/\n\ncongratulations Robert\n\nJohn and Jeffrey, i will write you shortly"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt_211
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032511.txt
TSA
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/5/2017 3:52:39 PM", "subject": "TSA", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nTSA called me,. They inform closing TSA inspection at 3pm,,\nAsked if we could depart 2:30pm, ?\n\nIs 2:30pm ok for departure, ,\n\nOtherwise it would be after Trump's departure between 4 and 5pm\n\nIs 2:30pm inspection / departure ok?\n\nThx\nLarry"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt_212
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031668.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 17, 2017 6:12 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:13 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Here we go"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/19/2017 10:45:11 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "soo crazy."}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt_214
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026314.txt
Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, August 12 2018 05:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "E E E"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Aug 12, 2018, at 1:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "fun"}, {"sender": "Peter Thomas Roth", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:23 PM", "subject": "Re: Steve Bannon had morning with disgraced Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Great picture of you!!!\nhttps://pagesix.com/2018/08/11/steve-bannon-trying-to-get-on-disgraced-jeffrey-epsteins-good-side/?utm_source=maropost&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=pagesixdaily&utm_content=20180812&mpweb=755-7237853-719173670\nSteve Bannon trying to get on disgraced Jeffrey Epstein's good side"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt_222
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032456.txt
Re: new schedule
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/5/2017 12:32:54 AM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "Monday 4pm confirmed \nPres Trump departs Monday at 11 am,. TFR in place until 11:30am Monday, which requires 24 hour notice for \nDeparture screening if departing during TFR hours., \nTFR (Temporally Flight Restriction), \nOur departure time of 4:30 PM will not be impacted since TFR expires 11:30am Monday,. \nFYI, \nFriday, Josh left voicemail indicating chevron should present purchase agreement by midday Monday. for your \nreview., \nThx \nLarry"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Feb 4, 2017, at 2:58 PM", "subject": "Re: new schedule", "body": "monday 4 pm to lsj, thurs morning pre clear to palm beach. sunday 12 new york. tues paris to 21 new \nyork. 24 santa fe. -march 1"}]
2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt_225
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032226.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 9:28 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trump is living proof of the adage that it is better to be lucky than smart."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ill give you details when 1 see you, when are you in ny?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Going up to NY Friday morning. Think Iam going to drive. I will then stop to pee and get gas at a rest stop\non the New Jersey turnpike, will observe all of the people there who are at least 100 pounds overweight, will\nhave a mild panic attack as a result of the observation, and will then decide that I am not eating another bite of\nfood for the rest of my life out of fear that I will end up like one of these people."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 26, 2015, at 10:21 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "what time , I will come up"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Will leave @ 9, so will be in ny @ 1 pm."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Aug 27, 2015, at 6:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "ok , anytime you like, you can drive right to me and i will feed you.::)"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmeli <kathyruemmler@example.com>", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/27/2015 2:25:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Great."}]
7
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt_258
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022829.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story , is that she was\nat multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with\nhim, \"he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER\n\nthere, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was\nfantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday\nexplaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs,\ntransferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back\nhere as \"reported fact.\" Problem with ia story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and\nunlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they\nmight. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are\npublic people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk\ntomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "anytime tomorw ok"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 4:42:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "now good?"}]
5
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt_267
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
Help!
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tuesday, January 19, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,"}, {"sender": "iin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the \"people\" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anyting happened recently? it is my birthday today"}, {"sender": "iin", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories!\n\nThe problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "On Wednesday, January 20, 2016", "subject": "Re: Help!", "body": "what do you suggest?"}, {"sender": "CC", "recipients": ["jeffrey E."], "timestamp": "Monday, February 15, 2016 3:25 PM", "subject": "Help!", "body": "Still have Zorro W pjs... Perfect for my lonely Valentine's Day.\nSo, what do you think about my suggestion to help?\nHow are you holding up?"}]
6
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt_273
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt
Reminder Ed Boyden.
[{"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/17/2014 11:55:40 AM", "subject": "Reminder Ed Boyden.", "body": "Reminder: Would you like me to set up a call for you with Ed Boyden?"}, {"sender": "Ed Boyden <edboyden@mit.edu>", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "July 14, 2014, 4:50:47 AM EDT", "subject": "Re: deception", "body": "Sorry again for that last minute cancellation in the Spring -- alas,\nthe perils of running a new center, that I no longer control my\nschedule like in the good old days. But the Obama BRAIN Initiative is\nrunning strong, and MIT has a good bid for a seat at the table, so\nthat is good. Want to revisit a time for a chat? My schedule is now\nmuch more free, thanks to these BRAIN initiative activities\nlaunching..."}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt_277
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033012.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "lor. 8. jul. 2017 kl. 15.22", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I am in paris you?"}, {"sender": "Thorbjon Jagland", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "In Norway. Next time, tell me well in advance, would be interesting to learn more more about Trump. I am totally confused."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thorbjon Jagland"], "timestamp": "7/10/2017 7:40:41 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Ok but it's easy"}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt_282
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032908.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:54 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\n\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon i.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "You called it! How are you positioned re market?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:58 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "long dow , short yen euro and pound. long reits,"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:10 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "who is treasury secretary? Is Mnuchin a done deal? Seems too obvious."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:04 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "number?"}]
5
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt_292
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029501.txt
Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com
[{"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": ["Martin G Weinberg", "Gerald B. Lefcourt", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/30/2016 2:45:27 PM", "subject": "Fwd: media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": "Sent from my iPhone\n\nBegin forwarded message:"}, {"sender": "Zimmerman, Malia McLaughlin", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": null, "subject": "media inquiry - FoxNews.com", "body": "Hi Alan\n\nI was reading through the files related to the Jeffrey Epstein case, including the original criminal case where\nyou defended Mr. Epstein, and saw a letter both you and Gerald Lefcourt co-authored on his behalf dated July\n6, 2007.\n\nThe letter said \"Mr. Epstein was part of the original group that conceived the Clinton Global Initiative, which is\ndescribed as a project 'bringing together a community of global leaders to devise and implement innovative\nsolutions to some of the world’s most pressing challenges.’ Focuses of this initiative include poverty, climate\nchange, global health, and religious and ethnic conflicts.\"\n\nI just wanted to clarify if Mr. Epstein was on the board of directors or listed as a founder anywhere or on any\npaperwork associated with the foundation and if so, in what capacity. Also wanted to clarify what you\nspecifically mean by being part of the original group.\n\nI attached a screen shot of the exact passage I am referring to.\nThanks,\n\nMalia"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt_295
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028846.txt
NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune
[{"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/27/2014 10:54:13 AM", "subject": "NYTimes: Sanctions Revive Search for Secret Putin Fortune", "body": "President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis, while derided by critics as slow and weak, has reinvigorated a 15-year global hunt for the Russian leader's hidden wealth.\nhttp://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/27/world/sanctions-revive-search-for-secret-putin-fortune.html?smid=nytnow-share&smprod=nytnow"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt_303
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST
[{"sender": "Brad Edward", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "4/6/2018 3:49:11 PM", "subject": "CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST", "body": "I expect a crisp, new bill. Your personalized message can say whatever you would like but it should include, “you win!”"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt_310
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033343.txt
POTUS
[{"sender": "Larry Visoski PF", "recipients": ["Je vacation [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2019 6:07:04 PM", "subject": "POTUS", "body": "Jeffrey\n\nPres Trump arrives PBI Friday the 15th at 6pm,\nHe departs Monday 18th 4:30pm\n\nMay effect our PBI arrival from Puerta Plata if we travel on Monday,, just heads up,,.\n\nThx,\nLarry"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt_319
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028675.txt
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "2/15/2013 12:42:34 AM", "subject": "", "body": "as you asked"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt_323
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031442.txt
failure notice
[{"sender": "MAILER-DAEMON@p3plIsmtp05-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "1/6/2015 1:15:20 AM", "subject": "failure notice", "body": "Your mail message to the following address(es) could not be delivered.\nThis is a permanent error. Please verify the address(es) and try again.\n<christina@jeffreyepstein.org>:\nchild status 100...The e-mail message could not be delivered because the user's mailfolder is full."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt_328
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033425.txt
null
[{"sender": "Robert Trivers [nn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/22/2018 12:03:25 AM", "subject": null, "body": "Apologies for requesting support in what was originally intended as an update on work done\n\niam done with that, you will receive no more messages from me regarding funding, i am most grateful for your\nhelp—without it, i doubt 1 would have a book in view on Honour killings—i can finish it on my own and fully\nintend to\n\nyou once said you would \"never not support me\" but never, as we both know, is a very long time—i am much\nmore scared of Trump's capacity to destroy the stock market—but as long as i do not get orders from you to\nsell, 1 will ride it out\n\ni hope everything is good in your life\n\nwarmest best, as always\n\nbob"}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt_330
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031822.txt
From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/7/2019 3:36:37 AM", "subject": "From Fox News - DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted", "body": "DOJ to investigate plea bargain awarded to Clinton-linked sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but watchdogs say probe is tainted\nhttps://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-opens-probe-into-plea-bargain-awarded-by-trump-official-to-alleged-pedophile-predator-jeffrey-epstein\nIt is bizarre to see who tries to get political mileage out of this."}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt_339
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033431.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/20/ex-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-gets-prison-surrender-date-delayed-two-months-to-may-6.html"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 8:51 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Is she in de today or tomorrow?"}, {"sender": "J", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid"], "timestamp": "Thursday, February 21, 2019 8:52 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Trust me"}, {"sender": "Weingarten, Reid", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/21/2019 1:54:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Of course I trust you...what is going on?"}]
4
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt_340
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025118.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
[{"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/29/2017 12:49:27 AM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.\n\nDid Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship asa source,. thought you should know. not nice"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM", "subject": "Re: Is Donald still feeling good", "body": "More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising. very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.\n\nMy world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.\n\nHow guilty is Donald?\n\nOf crudity surely\n\nOf gross ignorance surely\n\nOf being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely\n\nOf being over line on family profiting very likely\n\nOf gross disregard for appearances almost surely.\n\nOf Russians having financial leverage. Less clear\n\nOf Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain\n\nStrikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.\n\nDo u agree w foregoing?"}]
3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt_343
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030748.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:12", "subject": "Re:", "body": "inital respone, too many unanswerd question raised, realtionship with jeffrey/, ? you and clinton? her and andrew? whats the deal here? why is she there . this is who i am, this how i know jeffrey, employed from „ to.. . I was aware that jeffrey hired masag people, I sometine hired them, she was one of them. recolletion empllyed, firmative. . what. I am writing to writin to respond to the alleagtinoin that have been made whcich are categoricly untrue. . during hte time i met mr derhsowiz , in general inviting a subpeona. ? you will never answer questions to the press satisfaction they will not be persuaded."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:18", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["G Maxwell"], "timestamp": "Saturday, 10 January 2015 09:31", "subject": "Re:", "body": "i am on the phone with other attny getting you an answer."}, {"sender": "G Maxwell <GMax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I need it written out in full."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["G Maxwell [GMax1@ellmax.com]"], "timestamp": "1/10/2015 2:41:47 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "call me"}]
5
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt_356
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033357.txt
my occasional tweet
[{"sender": "paul krassner", "recipients": ["Kevin Bright", "Danny Goldberg"], "timestamp": "5/9/2019 11:24:30 PM", "subject": "my occasional tweet", "body": "“Trump has grabbed the pussy of the Statue of Liberty.”"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt_367
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt
Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011
[{"sender": "us.gio@jpmorgan.com", "recipients": ["Undisclosed recipients"], "timestamp": "6/14/2011 11:54:12 AM", "subject": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011", "body": "Eye on the Market, June 14, 2011 (attached PDF is easier to read)\n\nMarket update: for better or worse, this is the kind of year we were expecting. We were surprised at the market’s unbridled optimism in April*, since the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems has a long way to go. We chose the charts on the front page of our 2011 Outlook carefully; they were designed to show that equity markets were priced inexpensively, but were likely to stay that way, given too much stimulus in the East, and ineffective stimulus in the West **. We expect a modest second half recovery, based primarily on US capital spending increases, easy credit conditions everywhere, and a pick-up in industrial production in Japan. But the world’s structural problems are weighing on the private sector, and our portfolios are positioned for a single-digit year in credit, equities and hedge funds.\n\n* The Osama Bin Laden episode marked the equity market peak. Some commentators saw this event as a basis for further optimism, but unsurprisingly, the positive glow lasted for only around 2.5 hours the subsequent Monday. According to the Congressional Research Service, over the last decade, the US has spent at least $1.1 trillion in war funding operations, surpassing the constant-dollar cost of the Korean and Vietnam Wars combined. This highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.\n\n** So far, the large growth and employment multipliers from deficit spending estimated by Christina Romer (former Chair of the President’s Council of Economic Advisers) have not materialized. John Taylor and John Cogan from Stanford have been closer to the mark: an initial boost, but then a rapidly fading benefit\n\nSomething different this week. I was on the road seeing clients last week, and was asked “what should be done about job growth”. We are investors and not politicians, so my ideas [a] are not relevant. However, it seems to me that anyone involved in the jobs debate should be required to read the article below, written after the prior deep US recession (1990-1991). It’s from George McGovern, one of the most liberal politicians [b] ever to hold office and run for President. His epiphanies after leaving office and running the Stratford Inn are worth considering as legislators contemplate additional job creation measures, and the broader regulatory environment in which the private sector operates.\n\n“A Politician's Dream Is a Businessman's Nightmare”, by George McGovern, June 1992 [c]\n\nWisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late. (Justice Felix Frankfurter). It's been 11 years since I left the U.S. Senate, after serving 24 years in high public office. After leaving a career in politics, I devoted much of my time to public lectures that took me into every state in the union and much of Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Latin America. \n\nIn 1988, I invested most of the earnings from this lecture circuit acquiring the leasehold on Connecticut's Stratford Inn. Hotels, inns and restaurants have always held a special fascination for me. The Stratford Inn promised the realization of a longtime dream to own a combination hotel, restaurant and public conference facility--complete with an experienced manager and staff. In retrospect, I wish I had known more about the hazards and difficulties of such a business, especially during a recession of the kind that hit New England just as I was acquiring the inn's 43-year leasehold. I also wish that during the years I was in public office, I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties business people face every day. That knowledge would have made me a better U.S. senator and a more understanding presidential contender.\n\nToday we are much closer to a general acknowledgment that government must encourage business to expand and grow. Bill Clinton, Paul Tsongas, Bob Kerrey and others have, I believe, changed the debate of our party [d]. We intuitively know that to create job opportunities we need entrepreneurs who will risk their capital against an expected payoff. Too often, however, public policy does not consider whether we are choking off those opportunities. \n\nMy own business perspective has been limited to that small hotel and restaurant in Stratford, Conn., with an especially difficult lease and a severe recession. But my business associates and I also lived with federal, state and local rules that were all passed with the objective of helping employees, protecting the environment, raising tax dollars for schools, protecting our customers from fire hazards, etc. While I never doubted the worthiness of any of these goals, the concept that most often eludes legislators is: `Can we make consumers pay the higher prices for the increased operating costs that accompany public regulation and government reporting requirements with reams of red tape.' It is a simple concern that is nonetheless often ignored by legislators [e]. For example, the papers today are filled with stories about businesses dropping health coverage for employees. We provided a substantial package for our staff at the Stratford Inn. However, were we operating today, those costs would exceed $150,000 a year for health care on top of salaries and other benefits. There would have been no reasonable way for us to absorb or pass on these costs. \n\nSome of the escalation in the cost of health care is attributed to patients suing doctors. While one cannot assess the merit of all these claims, I've also witnessed firsthand the explosion in blame-shifting and scapegoating for every negative experience in life. Today, despite bankruptcy, we are still dealing with litigation from individuals who fell in or near our restaurant. Despite these injuries, not every misstep is the fault of someone else. Not every such incident should be viewed as a lawsuit instead of an unfortunate accident. And while the business owner may prevail in the end, the endless exposure to frivolous claims and high legal fees is frightening. \n\nOur Connecticut hotel, along with many others, went bankrupt for a variety of reasons, the general economy in the Northeast being a significant cause. But that reason masks the variety of other challenges we faced that drive operating costs and financing charges beyond what a small business can handle. It is clear that some businesses have products that can be priced at almost any level. The price of raw materials (e.g., steel and glass) and life-saving drugs and medical care are not easily substituted by consumers. It is only competition or antitrust that tempers price increases. Consumers may delay purchases, but they have little choice when faced with higher prices. In services, however, consumers do have a choice when faced with higher prices. You may have to stay in a hotel while on vacation, but you can stay fewer days. You can eat in restaurants fewer times per month, or forgo a number of services from car washes to shoeshines. Every such decision eventually results in job losses for someone. And often these are the people without the skills to help themselves--the people I've spent a lifetime trying to help. \n\nIn short, “one-size-fits-all” rules for business ignore the reality of the market place. And setting thresholds for regulatory guidelines at artificial levels--e.g., 50 employees or more, $500,000 in sales--takes no account of other realities, such as profit margins, labor intensive vs. capital intensive businesses, and local market economics. The problem we face as legislators is: Where do we set the bar so that it is not too high to clear? I don't have the answer. I do know that we need to start raising these questions more often.\n\n---------\n\nSo, there you have it, one of the more remarkable epiphanies in American politics: a paean to entrepreneurship and government restraint from one of its most progressive members. Public epiphanies like this are rare, but there have been others. Last year, Al Gore conceded that first-generation ethanol was “not good policy” given its low energy conversion ratios, and said he had supported ethanol out of “a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for president\" [f]. In 2008, former Fed Chair Greenspan conceded that his Ayn Rand philosophies regarding regulations and shareholder self-interest were flawed. Perhaps the most famous epiphany was from Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense and one of the principal architects of the Vietnam War. In 1995, he conceded that he was “wrong, terribly wrong” about the war. George McGovern was one of the war’s fiercest opponents, saying on the floor of the Senate, “I'm tired of old men dreaming up wars for young men to fight”.\n\nThere may be no magic elixir of policies to speed the adjustment the US faces. Look at it this way: the US is trying the mega-stimulus route, while the UK has accelerated its fiscal austerity program. Yet both countries are struggling with below-trend growth and employment. Perhaps after a debt binge, there are no easy answers, other than time. What to do next? McGovern’s article suggests that an overly interventionist public sector may be the wrong answer, given the unintended consequences.\n\nMichael Cembalest\n\nChief Investment Officer"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt_379
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032707.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Now being reported that Trump’s lawyers sent a letter to MW’s publisher demanding that they not publish the book."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 4, 2018, at 10:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.hollywoodreporter.com/amp/news/michael-wolff-my-insane-year-inside-trumps-white-house-1071504"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/4/2018 6:10:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Finally got the apartment so can “move in” tomorrow."}]
3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt_380
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033419.txt
Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal
[{"sender": "David", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "11/29/2018 3:57:47 AM", "subject": "Shared Article from AOL: Report: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal", "body": "They try to keep this story going from every angle. Now dershowitz isn't involved; rather he is a high powered\nlawyer. I didn't know you also had lefkowitz. I met the guy once when a prospective client asked me to try a\ncase with him. One meeting was enough for me to see clearly that that would not have worked out well; but he\napparemtly is a successful lawyer.\n\nOne thing for sure the article gets wrong - that the \"victims\" were silenced.\nHope you are doing well.\nDavid\n\nReport: Trump aide helped sex abuser get cushy plea deal\nhttps://aol.it/2BDSkO1"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023262.txt_381
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023262.txt
null
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinel ae"], "timestamp": "Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:17 PM", "subject": null, "body": "glad to see you are personally on the mend - as well as the fence. -- As you know i dread money discussions with you-- however -we should address the issue of what you would like to do moving forward. re- do family office, accounting trusts , estate and apollo agreements . Along with your \"payment \"last year we agreed . no further obligations on each side. yes, i continued to moan. I realize that though Ive done quite a lot this year already _, it is not your responsibility. . As you often like to"}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt_384
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030760.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["LHS"], "timestamp": "10/2/2016 4:14:41 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "zero. ! , do you want to have dinner with rothchild in new york. thurs. , woody?"}, {"sender": "LHS", "recipients": ["Jeff"], "timestamp": "Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:32 AM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "How plausible is idea that trump is real cocaine user?"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt_388
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029231.txt
Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "3/19/2015 9:43:40 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:54 PM", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "John Sullivan", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI'm John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I've been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan\nJohn Sullivan\nReporter\n1150 15th Street NW\nWashinnton DC 20071"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt_391
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt
time to publish this instead ofthe trite.
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Mortimer Zuckerman"], "timestamp": "2/10/2015 5:22:52 PM", "subject": "time to publish this instead ofthe trite.", "body": "ore\n15 of 141,013\nFwd: Statement for Press"}, {"sender": "Carolyn Cohen", "recipients": ["Alan Dershowitz"], "timestamp": "February 10, 2015 at 10:40:57 AM EST", "subject": "Statement for Press", "body": "Alan Dershowitz's Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz.\nDershowitz's lawyers have filed a detailed reply to Jane Doe #3 false charges. In it they definitively respond to all of the alleged evidence presented by Jane Doe #3 and her lawyers. Since that filing Mr. Dershowitz's lawyers have uncovered additional evidence that Jane Doe #3 has lied about her alleged contacts with fonner President Clinton and former Vice President Gore and the then Mrs. Gore."}]
2
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023276.txt_395
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023276.txt
null
[{"sender": "Heather", "recipients": ["Brad", "Jeffrey", "Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Brad and Jeffrey,\n\nGagosian has one final change to the Picasso agreement. As you know, we have structured this\nagreement with the Buyer as either Narrows Holdings LLC or AP Narrows LP, and given both of those\nentities the right to assign the agreement to any one among Leon, Debra, the kids, or family trusts\nincluding APO1 and APO2.\n\nGagosian wants us to agree that, if Narrows/AP Narrows assigns the agreement to someone else,\nNarrows/AP Narrows “Shall not be discharged from its liabilities under this Agreement and\nshall remain primarily liable to Seller.” Larry is concerned that we might assign to the\nBlack kids or to a trust that has no assets, and then when he has to sue us because we\ndon’t make the final payment of the purchase price but have possession of the art, the\nentity/person to which we have assigned the agreement has no money.\n\n| think this is a valid concern and that we should agree to it.\n\nHowever, Ada just reminded me that it is possible that Narrows/AP Narrows (really,\nLeon’s) agreeing to effectively guarantee payment by the assignee might be considered\na gift to the assignee. In the discussions with Alan about rearranging the bank loan once AP\nNarrows is operational, Alan agreed that there could be deemed to be a potential gift from Leon to\nAPO1/APO2 if Leon provides a guarantee to the bank that is for the benefit of the trusts as partners in AP\nNarrows. Alan suggested mitigating this risk by having the trusts sign side agreements with Leon which\nsay that if AP Narrows defaults on the loan and the bank goes after Leon on his guarantee, the trusts will\nmake him whole.\n\nThis issue only arises if we assign the agreement. The risk is also limited in time because it would run\nfrom the moment we assigned the agreement until the final payment is made, which even if we assigned\nimmediately after signing, would only be 11 1/2 months.\n\nShall I agree to Gagosian’s request that Narrows/AP Narrows remain liable even if they assign the\nagreement?\n\nI’m in the office if you would like to discuss this, but I would love to get back to Gagosian ASAP so we\ncan have this agreement signed today.\n\nThanks,\n\nHeather"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brad Wechsler", "Melanie Spinella", "Ada Clapp", "Richard Joslin"], "timestamp": null, "subject": null, "body": "lets look at funding the art partnership begin with 100 m of unencumbered art. plus 20 inveestment. and\nthe same amoiunt of value from trust. leon should choose b trustee and begin to use mechanics. . later\nwe can amend and add ."}]
2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt_396
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric
[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.\nFlying back.\n\nHow is life among the lucrative and louche?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "anyone stand out. . ? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild. !!!."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/27/2017 3:10:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is ‘stunned’ by president’s rhetoric", "body": "Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.\nLots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.\n\nI observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent\nof population...\n\nMnuchin plumbs new depths.\n\nWar seems more likely than I used to think\n\nDjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.\n\nI’m trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be\nirrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can’t work at a network or\nthink tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT"}]
3
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt_406
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, March 4, 2011 4:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "GMAX <gmax1@ellmax.com>", "recipients": ["J Jep <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Mark Cohen", "recipients": ["NY Max <gmax1@ellmax.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500", "subject": "FW: Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise."}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["Brett D. Jaffe"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 04, 2011 11:12 AM", "subject": "Ghislaine Maxwell", "body": "Dear Brett Jaffe,\n\nI left you a telephone message earlier. The Mail on Sunday newspaper is running a story on Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew and others this weekend.\n\nWe urgently require responses from Ms Maxwell to the following questions. Our deadline is noon tomorrow.\nMy telephone numbers are i or\n\nAnnette Witheridge\nOn behalf of the Mail on Sunday\n\n1. EE says Ghislaine Maxwell offered her a job as a masseuse with Jeffrey Epstein when she was aged 15. Ms Maxwell led {J upstairs on her first visit to him at his Palm Beach house. Mr Epstein was naked on massage table.\n\nMs Maxwell initiated a bisexual encounter during which Ms Maxwell rubbed her own breasts on Mr Epstein\n\nand directed to copy her."}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt_413
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:41 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/03/21/trump-signs-nasa-bill-aimed-at-landing-on-mars/?utm term=.64eb9bf54e09"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:46 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All shoe. This is not supporting science. It is all about the size of the rocket for him. All this will do is give him glory and not contribute to science."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Lawrence Krauss"], "timestamp": "Mar 22, 2017, at 5:09 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you told me you were worried about space and i told you not to worry, he will decimate climate change . and support, verifiable projects."}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/22/2017 12:27:48 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I was never worried about space.. I always knew he was enamored with human space exploration because it is big and showy.. I even wrote that in print early on.. for him that is science.. it isn't for those of us who know.. it is more bad news as far as I am concerned because this big budget will decimate real science.. 900 million cut in DOE office fo science will kill particle physics.. will end funding for me, for example.."}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt_416
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026937.txt
Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/8/2019 1:23:55 PM", "subject": "Tax expert tells Congress there is 'a lot to find' in Trump's returns", "body": "• https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/tax-expert-tells-congress-there-lot-find-trump-s-tax-n969121"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt_418
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022949.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-megowan/ the same boies that represents | who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients. he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinnner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.\n\nboies is going to be in the firiing line. from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, , his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as aninsurance co. --_ ... phone only"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "iam more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "As they are both bulkshitters"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:00 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "All. With gods help ;)"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:48 AM", "subject": "Re: Boies, Voila.", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html. Unclear to me why he is getting involved with you...."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando"], "timestamp": "11/8/2017 1:49:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "MONEY '!!!! he lost the fee for hank greenburg, and needed money for his firm. if you look into boies and AIG you will find the answer"}]
7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt_427
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032854.txt
Fwd: Trump
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmier", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 5:47:06 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 12:44 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "NYT called me about you and Trump. Also, Hillary campaign digging deeply. Again, you should consider preempting."}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt_433
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt
Patterson
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 3:39:39 PM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be able \nto do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In a \nsense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I have \nsome thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting you \nframe your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and technical \nproficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something along the \nlines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and perhaps \nsome social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, expensive \neffort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll surely \nbe unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will amp \nup the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've encountered \nbefore. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt_439
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:39 AM", "subject": "Patterson", "body": "A few things to think about: \nIf the Patterson book is being published in August, that presents some time frame issues. You would not be \nable to do a competing book or documentary before then. This is not to say that they shouldn't be pursued. In \na sense, better that they know what Patterson's position is and, a year from now say, be able to counter it. I \nhave some thoughts on book and doc to share at your convenience. \nThat being said, you do need an immediate counter narrative to the book. I believe Trump offers an ideal \nopportunity. It's a chance to make the story about something other than you, while, at the same time, letting \nyou frame your own story. Also, becoming an anti-Trump voice gives you a certain political cover which you \ndecidedly don't have now. Still, this necessary involves you going public. And so the most basic decision is \nabout your willingness to do that. My view is that in a couple of weeks you could master message and \ntechnical proficiency. I know a bunch of people who could be very helpful here. This would involve something \nalong the lines of you writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview (Charlie Rose, I'd say), and \nperhaps some social media efforts. \nSpeaking of which, again, I think a strategic plan, involving your public identity, philanthropic activities and \ninterests, and the development of media allies, ought finally to be put in place. A big, comprehensive, \nexpensive effort. \nThe alternative is to continue to keep head down and hope Patterson book is just more he-said she-said and \nConnolly getting lost in the reeds (which, as an inveterate conspiracist, he always does). My worry is that \nPatterson can be counted on to produce a bestseller, and while he isn't regarded as a serious writer, he'll \nsurely be unloading a lot of tabloid copy. Because this will be tied to the election, the Trump-Clinton angle will \namp up the attention 10-fold, in fact, possibly, a hundred fold. Possibly more than anything you've \nencountered before. \nMeanwhile--\nIn a lawyer's letter, I'd suggest including the following points--not necessarily legal, but a warning about how a \npress campaign might unfold (publishers are more worried about being caught in negative media controversy \nthan they are of legal threats): \n1) Little, Brown has made on the record representations to at least one well-known journalist that it was not \npublishing a book by James Patterson about Jeffrey Epstein--possibly an effort to avoid inquiries about the \nquestionable nature of the book; \n2) The actual author of the book, John Connolly, is someone other than the stated author, James Patterson. \nConnolly is known to have developed an obsession with Epstein, such that, his longtime employer, Vanity Fair, \nhas refused to allow him to write about Epstein for the magazine; \n3) Sources have confirmed for us that Patterson has had little more than a minimal consulting role in the book, \nand that Connolly has functioned in every material way as the book's researcher and writer. We believe \nPatterson's \"authorship\" of the book will not stand up to scrutiny. And, indeed, that the entire notion of an \nextension of the Patterson franchise into nonfiction, as it has been used in fiction and children's book--\neffectively other authors writing under the Patterson name—presents a host of journalism ethical issues."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E.", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "Friday, March 18, 2016 11:41 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Patterson", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "3/18/2016 4:30:13 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Privileged - Redacted"}]
3
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt_443
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031129.txt
Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!
[{"sender": "Cs", "recipients": ["Lesley Groff", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabu", "Januiz Banasiak [janusz53@me.com]", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby", "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/28/2012 2:41:02 PM", "subject": "Re: 3:00 Wheels up!!", "body": "Lesley,\n\nPlease inform JEE, Vice President Biden is in West Palm Beach and is schedule to depart between 5pm and 6pm today. He parks at Galaxy ramp also in Palm Beach. The airport will be closed between 5pm and 6pm. Flight time is 2+21min.\n\nwe'll need wheels up at 4pm or 2pm. Pls advise which time je prefers?\n\nThank you,\n\nLarry"}, {"sender": "Lesley Groff", "recipients": ["Larr", "Richard Barnnet", "Louella Rabuyo", "Januiz Banasiak", "Rich Kahn", "Darren Indyke", "Francis Derby"], "timestamp": "Sep 28, 2012 10:33 AM", "subject": "3:00 wheels up!!", "body": "JE has moved wheels up to 3pm today!\nLArry, please confirm\n\nAlso, Larry please confirm you will organize pick up in PB upon the arrival today"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt_444
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025594.txt
Re: $25K from ASU
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:10 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Hey Jeffrey.\n\nHow are things?\n\nJust to let you know. We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.\n\nSorry...\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:18 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "No problem- Trying to get more black for you"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 1:24 PM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Thanks!"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 7:45 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "brutal press. . sorry . it seems im a symbol for all ills. :). if you hate the rich, the men , the trump types . im your boy . at least for the moment. . hope you are well"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["J"], "timestamp": "Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:08 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "I'm good. Good luck!\n\n- Joi"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:03", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/opinion/sunday/oliver- sacks-gardens.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 8:23 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Nice."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "May 6, 2019, at 06:48", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "i can have andrew farkas , he gave a building to the hasty pudding harvard. fund plant guys. how are you ?"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 6:52 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "That would be great. I've been busy, but good. How are you? Heard you saw Madars."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "On May 6, 2019, at 06:56", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "yes, hes not beholden to ME too :). how should farkas give the money"}, {"sender": "Joichi Ito", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, May 6, 2019 at 7:14 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "Can he give a gift to me at MIT?"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joichi Ito"], "timestamp": "Monday, May 6 2019 11:15 AM", "subject": "Re: $25K from ASU", "body": "send details ."}]
12
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt_446
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032840.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis TS"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/44649 1 -trump-announces-departure-of-white-house-lawyer-\n\nemmet-flood"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis TS", "recipients": ["J <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 6:53 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They r all jumping ship - its totally crazy - it's time to worry\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "Jun 1, 2019, at 6:55 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yup"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/1/2019 10:57:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I hear Kelly Ann Conway next\n\nSent from my iPhone"}]
4
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033586.txt_447
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033586.txt
Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!
[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayer", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/2/2016 9:25:10 PM", "subject": "Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia!!", "body": "Donald Trump says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia\n\nClinton attacks Trump's foreign policy as 'dangerously incoherent’ 1 /27U.S. Democratic presidential candidate\nHillary Clinton lambasted Donald Trump's foreign policy platform as \"dangerously incoherent\" in a speech on\nThursday that cast her Republican rival as both a dangerous and laughable figure.\n\nA former U.S. secretary of state, Clinton attacked Trump for his policies and his character, suggesting Trump\nmight start a nuclear war if elected to the White House simply because \"someone got under his very thin skin.\"\n\"Donald Trump's ideas are not just different, they are dangerously incoherent,\" she said to a room of supporters\nin San Diego, California. \"They're not even really ideas, just a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds and\noutright lies.”\n\n© Mike Blake U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton delivers a speech on national\nsecurity in San Diego, California, United States June 2, 2016.\n\nClinton, the front-runner in the race to become the Democratic presidential nominee, delivered her speech as\nshe seeks to shift her attention to the Nov. 8 election against likely rival Trump and away from Bernie Sanders,\na U.S. senator from Vermont, who is continuing his longshot bid for the nomination.\n\nTrump, the Republicans’ presumptive nominee, has said he would sit down with North Korean leader Kim Jong\nUn to try to stop Pyongyang's nuclear program and has criticized the decades-old NATO alliance with mainly\nEuropean nations as obsolete and too costly for the United States.\n\nClinton derided these and other positions, promising she would do a better job keeping the United States safe\nand standing in front of a backdrop of 19 large U.S. flags, an unusual abundance even by the standards of\npresidential campaign events.\n\nTrump, a billionaire businessman who has never held elected office or worked in government before, says he\nhas experience dealing with foreign governments through setting up hotels, resorts, golf courses and beauty\npageants in foreign countries. Clinton, who is also a former U.S. senator and former first lady, mocked this.\n\"He says he has foreign policy experience because he ran the Miss Universe pageant in Russia,\" she said to loud\nlaughter.\n\nTrump has talked tough on foreign policy. He has said he would bring back waterboarding and other brutal\ninterrogation techniques for terrorism suspects that are widely regarded as torture and were discontinued by\nDemocratic President Barack Obama.\n\nHe has also vowed to renegotiate trade deals, called for a temporary ban on Muslims entering the country, and\nsaid he would ask members of the 28-nation NATO alliance to \"pay up” or \"get out.\"\n\nTrump has criticized Clinton for her handling of foreign policy during her 2009-2013 stint as foreign secretary,\nincluding the Sept. 11, 2012, attack by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya, that\nkilled the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.\n\nHe cites Clinton's support for the Iraq war - launched by former Republican President George W. Bush - as\nanother example of her shortcomings.\n\nAta rally Wednesday night in Sacramento, California, Trump said he had seen a copy of Clinton's speech and\n\"it was such lies about my foreign policy.\""}]
1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt_456
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025911.txt
RE: Gingrich view of Trump
[{"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Katka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:11 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "I openly and proudly support Trump.\n\nI've actually been able to pull people away from Hillary by saying I'd ONLY vote for Trump or Sanders. Citing they everyone else is establishment politics. I convinced a lesbian woman, older, to consider Trump after she"}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Agree. Funny, I too have been saying Trump or Bern. Get Hillary the hell out. She’s shameless!"}, {"sender": "Philip Kafka", "recipients": ["Terry Kafka"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, March 09, 2016 4:18 PM", "subject": "Re: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Terry Kafka", "recipients": ["Philip Katka", "jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "3/9/2016 10:21:30 PM", "subject": "RE: Gingrich view of Trump", "body": "Exactly! Bernie’s like a Mark Twain or Lafayette teacher from Brooklyn back in the 60’s and 70’s."}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt_459
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032346.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 4:59 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3914012/Troubled-woman-history-drug-use-claimed-assaulted-\nDonald-Trump-Jeffrey-Epstein-sex-party-age-13-FABRICATED-story.html"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Oh my goodness. I'm so sorry about these accusations. I wish there was a way to make them stop but glad that\nthe truth surfaced.\nShe sounds troubled for sure. Did you even know her?\n\nHope your trip went well ----"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Nov 10, 2016, at 5:09 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "nope"}, {"sender": "Melanie Walker", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/10/2016 10:11:46 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ugh\n\nHopefully this nonsense stops NOW!!"}]
4
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt_460
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032536.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:27 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "careful she is not trustworthy at ALLL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 10:43 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I am seeing a little bit I don't think it will turn into romance I am a bit old and not tall enough but she seems intelligent and kind Somers got an appointment from Trump she is on The White House Fellowship Commision it came through Woody and Suzanne Johnson because she bundled best Jonathan"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "a 2 timer?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey please help me here is she a hooker"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 8, 2017 at 11:31 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "alcoholic . drugs. unstable . consumate liar. CAREFUL"}, {"sender": "Jonathan Farkas", "recipients": ["Jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "5/8/2017 3:34:45 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Gosh I don't drink and I never did drugs"}]
6
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030118.txt_463
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030118.txt
Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 12:51 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "now"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:03 AM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Ob, sorry."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 2:22 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "eric?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 2:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Date?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:42 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "date certain? hamlet. ?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Mid-October, but there will be another run at him to reconsider."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 3:52 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "so is he the alternate in essence"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "It appears that way. I have advised that him staying through the end is the clearly preferable alternative."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 6:35 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "whose name is the apt in, does it have to be this one? or would another be ok."}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 6:41 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I signed the lease in my name for a year, so I think Iam pretty stuck. It is $11,000 a month and Latham reimburses me $8000 a month."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:12 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "furnished or un?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:13 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "Furnished"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 7:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "see you at 1030? tomor?"}, {"sender": "Kathy Ruemmler", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2014 11:45:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Floor Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the Nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General - Wikisource, the free online library", "body": "I won't get back to the city until @ 11:30, unfortunately."}]
14
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028757.txt_464
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028757.txt
Re: press
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:32 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I am glad to see you managed to find a way to improve your reputation in the press. Your concern and charitable\ncontributions are touching...\n\nYou forgot about everyone else your actions affected and the promises you made to fix it, but you clearly make an\neffort to improve your own image with contributions you can parade in the press. Congratulations.\n\nI suppose the few people who actually cared enough to put their lives and reputation on the line for you can fend for\nthemselves. I will never understand your priorities...\n\nHave a nice trip."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jul 26, 2012, at 6:23 AM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I have not seen this, not my doing. as you guessed I am not very well.. I hope you are. 1 believe in you."}, {"sender": "Mi", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:08", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "I told you I wasn't when you asked and then ignored me.\nWhat do you need?"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["ee"], "timestamp": "Thursday, July 26 2012 06:30 PM", "subject": "Re: press", "body": "i would appreciate it if you would stop being aggressive and accusatory, with me."}]
4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt_473
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031667.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Nicholas Ribis"], "timestamp": "5/17/2017 10:12:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Fun"}, {"sender": "Nicholas Ribis <i", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:08 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Robert Mueller appointed Special Counsel on Russian Probe bad for DJT"}]
2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028926.txt_477
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028926.txt
Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein
[{"sender": "Martin Weinberg", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "dkiesq"], "timestamp": "3/19/2015 8:40:59 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Alan Dershowitz", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thursday, March 19, 2015 3:54 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Sullivan, John", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "March 19, 2015 at 2:57:44 PM EDT", "subject": "Mr. Clinton and Mr. Epstein", "body": "Good Afternoon Mr. Dershowitz,\n\nI'm John Sullivan, a reporter at The Washington Post. I've been reading with great interest stories about allegations that former President Clinton spent time on Jeffrey Epstein's Caribbean Island. In a declaration you filled in federal court you state that you have reason to believe this is not true. Are you available to discuss this with me? Thank you for your time.\n\nJohn Sullivan\nJohn Sullivan\nReporter\n1150 15th Street NW\nWashington DC 20071\nPhone:\nMobile:\nEmail"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt_482
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033166.txt
null
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/20/2016 1:05:00 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nhttp://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast!\nnot sure how trump wins without PA.."}]
1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt_487
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031771.txt
Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics
[{"sender": "Nicholas Ribis", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/5/2019 1:41:49 AM", "subject": "Federal prosecutors subpoena Trump inaugural committee, source says - CNNPolitics", "body": "In case you missed it- Nick \nhttps://www.cnn.com/2019/02/04/politics/sdny-subpoena-trump-inauguration-committee/index.html"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt_488
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032868.txt
Re: The book on you...
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Lando", "Landon Thomas Jr."], "timestamp": "6/1/2016 3:28:14 PM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "no"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon [landon.thomas@nytimes.com]", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 11:25 AM", "subject": "Re: The book on you...", "body": "Keep getting calls from that guy doing a book on you -- John Connolly. He seems very interested in\nyour relationship with the news media. I told him you were a hell of a guy:) One oddity: he said he\nhad been told that that quote from Trump about you in the original NY Mag story had been\nmanufactured. ie, that I did not actually speak to Donald. Which is bull shit of course. I am sure that\nis what Trump told him as they have been getting a lot of questions from reporters about you.\n\nHe actually seemed to be a sensible guy/solid reporter -- just from the few conversations I had with\nhim. I think he is close to finishing up.\n\nDid you ever speak to him?"}]
2
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012035.txt_500
IMAGES-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012035.txt
FW: Victoria
[{"sender": "Abi Schwinck", "recipients": ["Pink", "Jean Luc Brunel", "Jeff Fuller"], "timestamp": "16/01/2015 05:16 (GMT+07:00)", "subject": "FW: Victoria", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Erik Bechtol <erik@pageparkes.com>", "recipients": ["Abi Schwinck"], "timestamp": "Thursday, January 15, 2015 5:12 PM", "subject": "Victoria", "body": "Hey Abi!\n\nHope you’re well. :) I’ve just had a conversation with Victoria, and she isn't comfortable\nremaining with MC2 with all the drama going on right now in the press. She's asked me to\ncontact you on her behalf. Please let me know if you see any issue with this. Thanks so much!"}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028780.txt_517
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028780.txt
TRUMP / POPE SCORECARD .....
[{"sender": "Dangene and Jennie Enterprise", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/19/2016 2:23:22 AM", "subject": "TRUMP / POPE SCORECARD .....", "body": "TRUMP I POPE\n\nCORE: Jennie Enterprise |\nwww.coreaccess.net |\n@dandjenterprise | Founder & Chairman | 66 East 55th Street New York NY 10022 | Main:"}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt_519
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032391.txt
RE: Re:
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tor"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 8:53 AM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "???\n\nJEE"}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 10:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m stuck in the cold! Five degrees. Aspen next week to warm up. Tilerson is a good move for Trump. Have gotten to know him at CSIS, he’s the real deal.\n\ntjp"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Pritzker, Tom"], "timestamp": "Thursday, December 15, 2016 9:59 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, any wordon karyyna plans. . can you belive MBS sent mea TENT carpets and all."}, {"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/15/2016 4:07:24 PM", "subject": "RE: Re:", "body": "Will call Japan tonite. A tent? Hmmm... | think that is code for ‘I love you’. Or, maybe code for ‘go pound sand’. Better check your KSA urban dictionary."}]
4
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028958.txt_522
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028958.txt
Re: following up: WA poetry release
[{"sender": "Leah Reis-Dennis <LeahReisDennis@unknown>", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Lisa New"], "timestamp": "Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:33 AM", "subject": "following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nMy name is Leah Reis-Dennis, and I'll be heading operations for Lisa's new non-profit, Verse Video Education. She's asked me to be in touch with you about helping us get a release from Woody Allen.\n\nFirst, I wanted to send along the rough stringout of footage from the conversation with Woody a couple of years ago on \"This is Just to Say\" by William Carlos Williams. This is totally unedited and uncut footage, but we would love the opportunity to turn it into something great.\nhttps://www.dropbox.com/sh/c0bn1jxeo0654g/uWZ6KBVDbLS?preview=WoodyAllen+Basic+Clip+for+Viewing.mov\n\nIf Woody Allen agrees to let us use the footage, he will be in distinguished company. To date, we have filmed conversations about poetry with dozens of distinguished Americans including:\n\nBill Clinton\nAl Gore\nJohn McCain\nMayor Rahm Emanuel\nMayor Tom Menino\nSupreme Court Justice Elena Kagan\nSir Mervyn King\nFormer Secretary of the Treasury Larry Summers\n\nThe conversation would be part of a large multiplatform initiative that Harvard Professor Lisa New has underway to bring poetry into the mainstream, and, especially, into English Language Arts classrooms in the United States and around the world. The initiative, Poetry in America, includes a HarvardX online course, a television series we're creating with WGBH to be paired with PBS LearningMedia segments for the classroom, and, a series of online professional development courses we're creating for ELA Middle and High School teachers and for their students."}, {"sender": "Soon Yi Previn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/8/2015 5:58:45 PM", "subject": "Re: following up: WA poetry release", "body": "Open in principle depending on specially how and where it would be shown and how it would be advertised- both subject to particular requirements and/or restrictions. Also dependent on approval of final cut. Would enter project with positive attitude but release would be reworked by lawyer."}]
2
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt_523
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032287.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 4:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:24:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "Lets catch up next time you are in NYC. NYT is making me write more on markets now and I don't really know who to believe any more re where the market is going these days."}]
5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt_527
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030628.txt
Re: Huffington Post
[{"sender": "Jeffiey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal"], "timestamp": "Fri Jul 01 07:18:25 2011", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "should you point out to Ariana Huff, that the same type of person, same as strauss Kahn is Andrews accuser, long criminal record, total liar. Ariana should champion the dangers of false allegations. send a reporter or reporters to investigate,., the palace would love it, the girl in the photo , was nothing more than a telephone answerer„ she was never 15, according to her version she worked for trump , first at that age, at MAra lago. ITs ridiculous, but the press like strauss kahn is afraid to question women."}, {"sender": "Peggy Siegal", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 2:43 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "If you rewrite your last email in better grammar, (and so I have a better understanding) I can cut and paste and send it to Arianna Huffmgton from me\nDid you know why Prince Albert's Charlene fled to the airport with a one way ticket back to South Africa? Because she found out about a third illegitimate child that is 3 months old...the palace officials followed her to the airport and propably made her an offer she could not refuse.. will get details from Jim Coleman when he comes home Sunday night.\nIn Southampton now. Peg"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Peggy Siegal <I_>"], "timestamp": "Friday, July 1 2011 10:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Huffington Post", "body": "I think a great opportunity has arisen. Just like the headlines of a hotel maid now proven to have lied in the Stauss Kahn case. The girl who accused Prince Andrew can also easily be proven to be a liar. I think Buckingham Palace would love it . You should task someone to investigate the girl Virginia Roberts, that has caused the Queens son all this agro. I promise you she is a fraud. you and i will be able to go to ascot for the rest of our lives. I know there is a public police report that no one has had the courage to publish, as they do not want to be seen attacking a \" vicitm\", but being falsely accused will be the new headline"}]
3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt_528
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033199.txt
Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post
[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/26/2016 3:37:10 AM", "subject": "Trump fills White House counsel and deputy national security posts - The Washington Post", "body": "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-fills-white-house-counsel-and-deputy-national-security-posts/2016/11/25/c4dee8d2-b341-11e6-belc-Scec35blad25_story.html"}]
1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt_532
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
told you
[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler"], "timestamp": "11/4/2016 10:17:45 PM", "subject": "told you", "body": ""}, {"sender": "NYSD ECF Pool@nysd.uscourts.gov", "recipients": ["CourtMail@nysd.uscourts.gov"], "timestamp": "Friday, November 04, 2016 5:59 PM", "subject": "Activity in Case 1:16-cv-07673-RA Doe v. Trump et al Notice of Voluntary Dismissal", "body": "This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to\nthis e-mail because the mail box is unattended.\n*** NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits\nattorneys of record and parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of\nall documents filed electronically, if receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees\napply to all other users. To avoid later charges, download a copy of each document during this first\nviewing. However, if the referenced document is a transcript, the free copy and 30 page limit do not\napply.\nU.S. District Court\nSouthern District of New York\n\nNotice of Electronic Filing\n\nThe following transaction was entered by Meagher, Thomas on 11/4/2016 at 5:59 PM EDT and filed on\n11/4/2016\n\nCase Name: Doe v. Trump et al\nCase Number: 1:16-cv-07673-RA\nFiler: Jane Doe\nDocument Number: 15\n\nDocket Text:\n\nNOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of\nCivil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-\ncaptioned action is voluntarily dismissed, against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document\nfiled by Jane Doe. (Meagher, Thomas)\n\n1:16-cv-07673-RA Notice has been electronically mailed to:"}]
2
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt_541
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032883.txt
Re: Trump
[{"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "I am getting worried. Is he ever going to implode?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:02 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "too late"}, {"sender": "Thomas Jr., Landon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 4:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "you think he will win?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Thomas Jr., Landon"], "timestamp": "9/16/2016 8:08:30 PM", "subject": "Re: Trump", "body": "ask again 30th"}]
4
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt_545
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023126.txt
Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide I Miami Herald
[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/10/2019 11:01:49 PM", "subject": "Acosta plea deal in Epstein sex case defended by former aide I Miami Herald", "body": ""}]
1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt_560
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt
null
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Sultan Bin Sulayem"], "timestamp": "8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Importance: High \nNewsmax.com \nLaffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the \nnation's economic woes is to adopt \"common-sense\" Reaganomics, the policy's architect Arthur Laffer claims \nin an exclusive Newsmax interview. \nLaffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama's former Council of \nEconomic Advisors' chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing. \n\"Reaganomics would fix any economy that's in the doldrums,\" Laffer said. \"It's not a magic sauce, it's \ncommon sense. \n\"You've got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business \nnet sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That's number one. \n\"Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not \ncure unemployment. \n\"Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I've ever \nheard of,\" Laffer said. \n\"Number four you need regulations, but you don't need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and \ncreate collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here. \n\"And lastly you need free trade,\" Laffer said. \"Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we \nproduce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn't sell them those things \nwe produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do.\" \nIn the interview the veteran economist said Standard & Poor's was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit \nrating — in fact it should have done so far earlier. \nThe agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody's and Fitch, don't do the same they won't be doing \ntheir jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of \ngovernment revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes. \n______`If you had a company that had revenues of $21/2 million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in \nsight, $11/2 million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what \nwould you rate that company? I surely wouldn't rate it AAA. \n\"That is the U.S. situation today,\" Laffer said. \"Taxes are about $21/2 trillion, government spending is about $4 \ntrillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don't see that as being a AAA country. \n\"If the S&P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago.\" \nLaffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are \ncompletely turned around. He said President Barack Obama's administration's only economic plan seemed to \nbe to expand government ownership of the means of production. \n\"They have nationalized the health care industry pretty extensively. They've done that with home building as \nwell. They've tried it with the auto industry as well. So they have moved very, very deliberatively and \npurposefully toward extending the government ownership of the means of production. \n\"That to me, if you read the tealeaves, is what they are doing. It is not what they are saying they are doing, but \nthat is what they actually are doing. \n\"People don't work to pay taxes, people work to get what they can after taxes. It's that very private incentive \nthat motivates them to work. If you pay people not to work and tax them if they do work, don't be surprised if \nyou find a lot of people not working.\" \nLaffer said the current economic woes started to form under President George W. Bush but have been made \nworse by Obama's policies. \n\"There's a wedge driven between wages paid and wages received and that wedge is the tax/government \nspending wedge,\" he said. \n\"That wedge has grown dramatically in the last 4 1/2 years...under W and a Republican administration \nand...under Obama. Bipartisan ignorance has led us to this very disastrously desolate state.\" \nLaffer had high praise for the role the tea party has played in bringing the problem of the deficits to the fore. \n\"The tea party is not the problem, the tea party may well be the solution,\" he said. \"They are critical to the \nfuture of the country in a positive way. They are the only fiscally sound people I know out there all the time. \n\"I don't know that I would go as far as they go on a lot of issues but I surely respect their movement very \nmuch.\" \nAnd he said any one of the group of Republicans vying for the party's nomination for the White House would \nmake\" a great president.\" \n\"Tim Pawlenty is spectacular. Newt Gingrich knows more about issues than anyone you've ever seen. Michele \nBachmann is out-of-sight wonderful,\" he said. \n\"Rick Perry is second to no one in this stuff If you look at Herman Cain, he's phenomenal. \n\"Oh and (Jon) Huntsman was a great governor of the state of Utah and is a phenomenally experienced \nintellectual competent man. \n\"When you look at the Republican candidates, you see a group of people who are absolutely outstanding in \nattributes.\""}]
1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt_568
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030592.txt
Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein
[{"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com", "A tiCsSCS"], "timestamp": "1/30/2015 7:03:47 PM", "subject": "Fw: Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "David Pegg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, January 30, 2015 12:00 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Media Enquiry - The Guardian - Re: Jeffrey Epstein", "body": "Dear Mr Weinberg,\nI hope this email finds you well. I am a journalist at The Guardian newspaper in London.\n\nWe are preparing for publication an article in which we may mention Mr Jeffrey Epstein, who is your client.\nWe have sent Mr Epstein an email concerning this article and made a number of attempts to contact him, to\nwhich he has not responded.\n\nPlease see the email in question below. Should Mr Epstein wish to respond, please ensure that we receive his\nresponse by no later than 18:00 on Monday 2nd February 2015.\n\nI would be grateful if you could acknowledge receipt of this email.\n\nYours faithfully,\n\nDavid Pegg\nThe Guardian\nKings Place\n90 York Way\nLondon\n\nN1 9GU"}]
2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028964.txt_574
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028964.txt
Re:
[{"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Joi Ito"], "timestamp": "Mar 20, 2016, at 2:52 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "barnaby and I will come up april 1"}, {"sender": "Joi Ito", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "3/20/2016 7:33:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I’m around.\n\nThat’s the day that Anonymous is supposed to take down Trump’s page.\nJust saying.\n\n- Joi"}]
2
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt_577
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019109.txt
FW: Privileged and Confidential - Fwd: JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!
[{"sender": "steven hoffenberg", "recipients": ["Players2", "Michael", "Charles", "TO ROGER STONE"], "timestamp": "August 11, 2016 at 9:36:01 AM EDT", "subject": "JAMES PATTERSON NEW BOOK TELLING FEDS COVER UP OF BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN CHILD RAPES RELEASE DATE OCT 10 2016 STEVEN HOFFENBERG IS ON THE BOOK WRITING TEAM !!!", "body": "CHILD RAPE BILLIONAIRE JEFF EPSTEIN NEW TELL ALL JAMES PATTERSON BOOK FEDS COVER UP NO FED ARREST OF MASS CHILD RAPIST BILLIONAIRE\n\nSTEVEN HOFFENBERG IS TAKING BACK THE NEW YORK POST NEWSPAPER OPERATIONS !!!!!"}]
1
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt_579
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026662.txt
Kuhn
[{"sender": "Robert Lawrence Kuhn", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "2/13/2017 11:08:13 PM", "subject": "Kuhn", "body": "Great talking. Covered lots. All fun!\n\nAttached is the Shanghai Science of Consciousness program (Stuart Hameroff put together; I advised).\n\nGregory Chaitin on Closer To Truth - https://www.closertotruth.com/contributor/gregory-chaitin/profile (scroll down for videos).\n\nMy Bloomberg TV on Trump/China (Feb. 1, pre Trump-Xi call)\n\n- https://www.dropbox.com/s/o06wvejllmsi917/Dr%20Kuhn%20Bloomberg%20Daybreak%20-%20Asia.mov?dl=0 -\n\nAppreciate discussing “Science of Sleep & Dreams” - I'l pull together significance of recent research/discoveries yielding inflection point, such that timing is propitious for the definitive TV series benchmarking the field and making impact.\n\nWarmest, Robert"}]
1
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.txt_583
IMAGES-007-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.txt
null
[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella Bo"], "timestamp": "Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "Lets start. |]. am aware that you are currently angry at the world. . me, karp wechsler. even\nyourself, all willing absorbers of the current high heat. (though you ,calling me ,Debra , did take away some\nofthe sting) Iam sorry to see you this way.\n\nemblematic ; I was asked to opine on whether to hire castrucci. an hour after I gave a preliminary yes. . I\ncalled you then texted you that i had thought more about it and changed my mind. The next day brad called\nand asked for my vote. I told him ,in no uncertain terms itisano , I categorically vote no. I called\n\nyou . youcame to see me. I said it was a bad idea. you said you were going to do it anyway , I said and\nfollowed up in writing ITIS A MISTAKE. and added Please don't come back to me with anything suggesting\notherwise , you and I should be clear I think it is wrong . A very strong NO . you of course can hire whomever\nyou like.\n\nearly on I told you I thought Tom remarkably careless . Eilleen goofy and your art lawyer not well informed to\nsay the least. you told me Tom was a senior partner. Eileen had headed the trading desk , and Ralph Lerner had\nto know what he was doing as he wrote the book. . I said I thought you deserved better ,should get better\npeople and no , am not an HR person. yesterday you told me that the reason you have hired whomver you\ncould find was to avoid being dependent on me. a decision by far , not the best place to try to save money )\nJoslin- who you say I hired. I neither found nor hired. With a two person given choice I approved joslin over\nsome woman that eileen preferred. against my repeated advice you and eileen decided the pay range at under\n300k. I told you at that time that I would personally pay the difference for a higher quality person, that was\nyears ago. I have sent over a hundred emails to you clearly saying he needs to be closely managed by\nbetter professionals. initially , that referred to Eillen and Ada.and after, brad. john etc. THere are\nmany emails each and every month from me, telling you , he is slipping failing cracking fragile. . crazy, nuts,\nheading towards incompetence. Unless YOU- TAKE ACTION! when I pressured him for accurate numbers ,\nyou told him, to tell me, that he works for you and NOT for me.. When I continued to press for accuracy from\nyour office , you told me that they were now all afraid of me and i should let brad communicate any requests, (\nyou now tell me \" we know what Brad is\"?). When I told you you office needs to be reviewed and changed you\ntold me i was being destructive rather than constructive. when 1 ultimately confronted joslin, in an attempt to\nprotect you, told him that his numbers were wildly inaccurate , you told me that i had caused his ultimate\nresignation and now have an affirmative obligation to fill in the resultant gap.\nI did give you a bad number , and apologized as soon as i realized it. an error that was an embarrassment for me\n, the fact that that the accurate number is still way below what you agreed to pay , has fallen by the\nwayside.( the preposterous argument that the end of year transaction was Alans idea , which you now know\nwas not true and that me not receiving Phaidon documents was unexplainable. was your justification\nthough, for non - full payment )\n\nHopefully You will recall that when you initially asked for my help. I declined repeatedly with the\nadmonition that that having a financial arrangement is fraught with danger and could complitcate our\nfriendship (as you will be unhappy paying what you will view as a large sum. while choosing to ignore"}]
1
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Epstein Email Threads Dataset

Dataset Summary

This dataset contains 5,082 parsed email threads extracted from OCR'd documents released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee. The emails have been processed using large language models to extract structured information including senders, recipients, timestamps, subjects, and message bodies, with OCR errors corrected and footers removed.

Dataset Description

Overview

This is a structured, machine-readable version of email threads extracted from the publicly released Epstein Estate documents. The original documents were OCR'd text files that required parsing to separate individual messages, extract metadata, and clean up OCR artifacts.

Key Features

  • 5,082 email threads with structured metadata
  • 16,447 individual messages across all threads
  • Average of 3.24 messages per thread
  • Chronologically ordered messages within threads
  • OCR errors corrected
  • Footers and disclaimers removed
  • Quoted text properly separated from message bodies

Dataset Structure

Thread-level Schema (epstein_email_threads.parquet)

  • thread_id: Unique identifier for the thread (e.g., "TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031683.txt_2")
  • source_file: Original source filename from the House Oversight release
  • subject: Thread subject line
  • messages: JSON string containing list of messages in the thread
  • message_count: Number of messages in the thread

Message Structure (within messages JSON)

Each message contains:

  • sender: Sender name and/or email address
  • recipients: Array of recipient strings
  • timestamp: Message timestamp (various formats preserved)
  • subject: Message subject line
  • body: Message body content (quoted text and footers removed)

Source and Processing

Original Source

All documents originate from the public release "Oversight Committee Releases Additional Epstein Estate Documents" on the official House Oversight Committee website (press release dated November 12, 2025):

https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-additional-epstein-estate-documents/

The underlying materials are distributed via a Google Drive structure maintained by the Committee. This dataset is an independent derivative collection built from that release and is not an official product of the U.S. House of Representatives or the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Source Dataset

This dataset is derived from the pre-processed CSV file available on Hugging Face:

https://huggingface.co/datasets/tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K

The source dataset (tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K) contains over 25,000 plain text files that were already OCR'd and organized into a single CSV file:

  • TEXT/ – Files that were originally text-based (e.g., PDFs, emails) converted to plain text
  • IMAGES/ – Image files (primarily JPG) converted to text via Tesseract OCR

The OCR processing was performed by the maintainers of the tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K dataset. All image files (approximately 20,000 JPGs) were converted to machine-readable text using the open-source Tesseract OCR engine. Native text-based files were converted using standard PDF/text extraction tools.

Processing Pipeline

This dataset represents a further processing step on the tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K CSV file:

1. Email Thread Parsing

Email threads were extracted from the pre-OCR'd CSV file using a large language model (LLM) with structured extraction:

  • Model: xAI Grok 4.1 Fast via OpenRouter API
  • Method: Structured extraction
  • Process:
    • Identified email threads vs. non-email content
    • Separated individual messages within threads
    • Extracted headers (From, To, Sent, Subject)
    • Separated quoted replies from message bodies
    • Ordered messages chronologically (oldest first)
    • Removed footers, disclaimers, and signature blocks

2. Quality Improvements

Post-processing improvements were applied to enhance data quality:

  • OCR Error Correction: Fixed common OCR mistakes (e.g., "jeeyacation" → "jeevacation")
  • Footer Removal: Removed "HOUSE OVERSIGHT [number]" markers and legal disclaimers
  • Quoted Text Cleanup: Removed quoted message citations from message bodies
  • Recipient Extraction: Extracted missing recipients from message bodies where possible

3. Quality Assurance

  • Automated Verification: All 5,082 threads validated for structure integrity
  • Manual Review: Sample verification against original CSV source
  • OCR Accuracy: Identified OCR errors corrected
  • Data Integrity: No data loss or corruption detected

Usage and Responsibilities (Required Reading)

Intended Use

This dataset is provided for research and exploratory analysis purposes. Common use cases include:

  • Academic research in fields such as computational linguistics, digital humanities, and social sciences
  • Text analysis and natural language processing research on real-world email communications
  • Exploratory data analysis of publicly released documents
  • Qualitative research by journalists, historians, legal scholars, and researchers
  • Methodological development for processing and analyzing structured email data

User Responsibilities

Users are responsible for:

  • Using the dataset only for lawful purposes and in accordance with institutional and ethical review requirements
  • Treating individuals mentioned in the documents with respect, and avoiding sensationalism or misuse of sensitive material
  • Clearly distinguishing model-generated content and exploratory findings from verified facts, and citing primary sources where appropriate
  • Complying with applicable law, institutional policies, and the terms of the original House releases

Not Intended For

This dataset is not intended for:

  • Fine-tuning language models
  • Harassment, doxing, or targeted attacks on any individual or group
  • Attempts to deanonymize redacted information or circumvent existing redactions
  • Making or amplifying unverified allegations as factual claims

All use must comply with applicable law, institutional policies, and the terms of the original House releases. See the "Legal and Copyright Status" and "Ethical and Content Warning" sections below before working with this corpus.

Legal and Copyright Status (Non-Authoritative)

The original underlying documents were created by various private individuals and entities, not by the dataset maintainer.

The documents are sourced from releases published by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The release webpages themselves carry standard copyright notices (© 2025 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform), and many individual documents are likely protected by copyright held by their original authors or rights holders.

This dataset:

  • Does not assert any ownership over the underlying documents
  • Does not grant any license to reproduce, distribute, or create derivative works from the underlying texts beyond what may already be permitted by law (e.g., fair use or similar doctrines in your jurisdiction)

Users are solely responsible for ensuring that their use of this corpus complies with applicable copyright law, privacy law, institutional policies, and the terms of the original House releases.

Nothing in this dataset card constitutes legal advice. If you plan to use this corpus in a public-facing product, for model training, or at scale, you should seek independent legal counsel.

Ethical and Content Warning

The documents contain material related to:

  • Sexual abuse and exploitation
  • Trafficking
  • Violence and other highly sensitive topics
  • Unverified allegations, opinions, or speculation

Users should be aware of the sensitive nature of this content and handle it appropriately in their research and analysis.

Data Quality

Extraction Accuracy

Based on sample verification against the original CSV source, the email extraction process was accurate:

  • No hallucinations detected: All extracted content matches the source material
  • No data loss: All messages and metadata were correctly extracted
  • Accurate parsing: Message boundaries, headers, and bodies were correctly identified and separated

Note: While sample verification showed no hallucinations or data loss, errors may exist in the full dataset. If you encounter any extraction errors, hallucinations, or data inconsistencies, please report them by opening an issue on the Hugging Face dataset repository.

Known Limitations

  • Source OCR Quality: Some original OCR errors from the source material may remain if not clearly identifiable (these are inherited from the tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K dataset, not introduced during extraction)
  • Timestamp Formats: Various timestamp formats preserved (not normalized) to maintain original format
  • Email Addresses: Some email addresses may be incomplete or malformed due to source OCR, but were extracted as-is from the source material

Dataset Statistics

  • Total Threads: 5,082
  • Total Messages: 16,447
  • Average Messages per Thread: 3.24

Citation

If you use this dataset in your research, please cite:

@dataset{epstein_emails_2025,
  title={Epstein Email Threads Dataset},
  author={notesbymuneeb},
  year={2025},
  url={https://huggingface.co/datasets/notesbymuneeb/epstein-emails},
  note={Derived from tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K, which contains OCR'd text from U.S. House Oversight Committee public release}
}

Acknowledgments

This dataset is derived from:

  1. Original Source: Publicly released materials by the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

  2. Intermediate Source: The pre-processed CSV dataset on Hugging Face

This dataset represents a structured, machine-readable version of email threads extracted from the tensonaut/EPSTEIN_FILES_20K CSV file.

Contact

For questions, issues, or feedback about this dataset, please open an issue on the Hugging Face dataset repository:

https://huggingface.co/datasets/notesbymuneeb/epstein-emails

Remember: This dataset contains sensitive content. Use responsibly and in accordance with all applicable laws and ethical guidelines.

Downloads last month
403
Size of downloaded dataset files:
4.55 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
4.55 MB
Number of rows:
5,082