Split (1)

train · 5.08k rows

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.

thread_id stringlengths 37 43	source_file stringlengths 35 37	subject stringlengths 0 231 ⌀	messages stringlengths 88 34.9k	message_count int64 1 42
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt_24848	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt	ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Kathy Ruemmler", "Darren Indyke", "Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Saturday, October 08, 2016 9:07 PM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/federal-judge-orders-hearing-in-donald-trump-rape-lawsuit-case/"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "Darren Indyke"], "timestamp": "10/9/2016 2:14:46 AM", "subject": "ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE", "body": "Attachments: Redline of 10-7-16 Revisions to Opp by DKI.docx MGW EDITS.docx"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030458.txt_24857	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030458.txt	RE: FW: Please forward	[{"sender": "Kirsty Mackenzie [kirsty.mackenzie@bbc.co.uk]", "recipients": ["Jack Goldberger"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 07, 2011 11:11 AM", "subject": "RE: Please forward", "body": "I am writing in an attempt to make contact with Jeffrey Epstein and wondered if you would, as his attorney, forward this message on to him?\n\nWe are keen to explore the possibility of conducting an interview with Mr Epstein, on the subject of the stories which are circulating, however inaccurately, about both him and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York; we'd be keen to hear from Mr Epstein first hand so that the various and at times, speculative reporting which is at large in the UK press can be better scrutinised?\n\nLet me tell you a bit about the Today programme.\n\nToday is the BBC's main morning news show; we have been part of the BBC for over 50 years and are generally considered one of the most important news broadcast outlets - either on radio or TV - here in the UK. We set the news agenda for the BBC and in many respects we set the daily news agenda for the country. Our interviews are regularly re broadcast across the BBC's national and international news network including - BBC World, BBC World Service and BBC Online. The combination of these outlets means the global 'reach' of a BBC Today programme interview is second to none.\n\nProgramme guests have included a selection of some of the biggest names in politics, business, international relations and the arts including US Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, President Nicholas Sarkozy, President Hamid Karzai, HRH the Prince of Wales, former President Musharraf, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, former President Bill Clinton, Senator George Mitchell, Al Gore, Kofi Annan, former Prime Minister Tony Blair, the Dalai Lama, Bill Gates, George Soros, Stephen Hawking, Sir Paul McCartney, Mick Jaggar and Salman Rushdie.\n\nWe are a programme that carries considerable weight and influence and which prides itself in being a first port of call for many of the most important and influential figures on the international stage.\n\nI can best be reached via my cell phone - I or this email address.\nMy very best wishes and my thanks!\nKirsty"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Peter Mandelson"], "timestamp": "07 March 2011 17:01", "subject": "Fwd: FW: Please forward", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Peter Mandelson [peter.mandelson@domain.com]", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Monday, March 7 2011 09:53 PM", "subject": "RE: FW: Please forward", "body": "home if you want to talk - going to bed early..."}]	3
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033368.txt_24858	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033368.txt	Koch network floats backing Democrats in revamp of influence operation	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "6/7/2019 4:21:40 PM", "subject": "Koch network floats backing Democrats in revamp of influence operation", "body": "they must hate trump..\nhttps://www.politico.com/story/2019/06/07/koch-network-gives-bipartisanship-a-chance-1356571"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031469.txt_24866	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031469.txt	Re: tomorrows news today	[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "5/21/2016 10:53:15 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "Yup. Going to be ugly. Who will win?\nSent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 21, 2016, at 6:02 AM", "subject": "Re: tomorrows news today", "body": "http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/05/20/trump-bill-clinton-rape_n_10062090.html"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030777.txt_24867	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030777.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 8:54 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im off sat to europe mid east etc. return around the 30"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:08 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon's \"nationalist-populist\" platform is coherent, rational, and, apparently appealing to a great many people. I can't see why at this point he wouldn't want to use his world-stage stature to make an argument for it and to claim leadership of it. What does he have to lose? What else is there, except to suck up to Trump, and get the chance to be manhandled by him again?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:15 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "why dont we also ask harvey weinstein to join to make sure we dont get any press :)"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:16 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "don't forget I want to go with you to the mid east sometime..."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:20 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Ha! On another note, this Woody thing is going south very quickly. Planning to speak to them this morning."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:26 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "yes, he is having what he refers to as his\" brain trust\"this weekend. but it appears the group needs a name change. They are all old thinkers. no social media strategy. no links to connecticut report. . the jackals now lying in wait for the next movie release. which i believe cannot happen at all now. but they tell him what he wants to hear. wonder wheel grossed 7m at the box office. the new movie is young ditz, prositutes. . drunken journalism student chasing an older guy. . The connecticut ( hired by the state ) report front page. -- WE interviewed dylan Nine times . two professionals AT THE TIME. we conclude that the story is fantasy. . NOTHING ELSE is relevant. mia. ronan. motives, policeman views. etc."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:32 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He has to turn this into a love story with Soon-Yi. She's the only one who can save him."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:37 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "not intellectually capable. . and frankly -unwiling. my shrink says ........"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:42 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Yes, yes, that's their continuing resistance speaking. But that doesn't change the fact that it is their ONLY option. AND it's a slam-dunk one. She would turn it around. If Dylan is coming out to speak publicly, Soon-Yi also has to. If Dylan is allowed to be the center of this story, Woody is cooked. If Soon-Yi claims it--and she is actually the center of the story--everything shifts and they can make it their own."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "1/18/2018 2:44:02 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "you and i as usual agree. - tell you more face to face. J an going to ask SB to sign your book"}]	10
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032710.txt_24874	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032710.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Jan 3, 2018, at 9:05 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/michael-wolff-fire-and-fury-book-donald-trump.html"}, {"sender": "anasalrasheed", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/8/2018 6:27:13 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "m traveling to see terry and antonio in dubai and bahrain .. wish you were here .. weather is greatc14"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029605.txt_24877	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029605.txt	Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070	[{"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 12:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Yup"}, {"sender": "Renata B", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "Woow0\nMichael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump\nhttps://www.npr.org/676040070"}, {"sender": null, "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/12/2018 5:44:32 PM", "subject": "Re: Michael Cohen Sentenced To 3 Years In Prison Following Plea That Implicated Trump - https://www.npr.org/676040070", "body": "How are you sneaky?"}]	3
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029684.txt_24879	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029684.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Mohamed Waheed Hassan", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Jeffrey,\nNeed your advice.\nMy finance minister is telling me that he has an anonymous funds manager who is willing to deposit 4 billion\ndollars in Maldives and that they are willing to lend a percentage of that in exchange for government\npromissory notes. The 4 billion would be deposited in the Central Bank. But they want us to set up a special\npurpose vehicle, a construction company fully owned by the government to receive the loan. Such a company\ncan only be set up under a presidential decree.\n\nI am also told that the funds manager would be charging Maldives upfront a certain percentage of the amount\nlent.\n\nI don't feel I have enough information on this. I don't know who is this funds manager. They always want the\nfinance minister to meet them in Bangkok or some place outside. Why would anyone want to deposit such a\nlarge amount here when we don't have a credit rating and public debt is so high. I feel very uncomfortable\nabout this.\n\nWhat do you think I should do. Iam very uncomfortable. In addition to the finance minister, a leading\npolitician and leader of the coalition parliamentary group is behind it. He could be my leading contender for\npresidency.\n\nDoes this sound all ridiculous to you. I have a strange feeling about this whole thing.\n\nBest regards\nWaheed"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed <q@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Jan 27, 2013, at 9:29 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "this from a fraud web site, your mimister will get upset that you dont want to at least try, what do we have to\nlose , always the pitch. THe following from the fraud site. --The essential fact in all advance-fee fraud\noperations is that the promised money transfer never happens—because the money does not exist. The\nperpetrators rely on the fact that, by the time the victim realizes this (often only after being confronted by a\nthird party who has noticed the transactions or conversation and recognized the scam), the victim may have\nsent thousands of dollars of their own money, and sometimes thousands or millions more that has been\nborrowed or stolen, to the scammer via an untraceable and/or irreversible means such as wire\n\ntransfer.“*!_ Stay away, however if you want to embarass your possible opponent , you might set it up so that\nhe looks like a fool, ask for amemo of why he thinks you should agree , have it include as many detials as\npossible, so that when you prove its a fraud,, you will make him look very silly as opposed to his saying , you\nmissed an opportunity, anyway,, glad you are well"}, {"sender": "Mohamed Waheed <q@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:33 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thank you. You are my savior. I will do exactly what you said."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Mohamed Waheed <q@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "1/29/2013 12:06:15 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "can we speak today, ?"}]	4
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021408.txt_24888	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021408.txt	Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment	[{"sender": "Lawrence M. Krauss", "recipients": ["Nancy Portland"], "timestamp": "12/11/2017 6:53:37 AM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "a few more minor changes.. one in first line of second paragraph and one misspelling corrected..so you can read this one:"}, {"sender": "Lawrence Krauss", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Dec 10, 2017, at 10:31 PM", "subject": "Re: URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "Second Draft:\n\nI appreciate the opportunity to respond to your email. While I am running the risk that you will report my comments, if you do, either out of context, or incompletely, I am responding with an effort to be complete. It is hard to know how to respond to a list of false and/or distorted allegations, along with misleading statements on your part. I treat people I interact with with respect, and I work hard to support and mentor students, colleagues, and members of the general public. I do not sexually harass people. If the purpose of your reporting is to somehow argue that Universities and other institutions are lax in dealing with well known individuals like myself, then in fact the situation is quite the opposite. My high public profile opens me up to more scrutiny at these institutions, not less, and it also opens me up to a host of outside complaints and allegations that other faculty do not receive, each of which the University has to respond to. The fact that I have remained a professor in all Universities with which I have been associated, in good standing, and also an officer or an invited speaker at organizations like CFI, which have strict harassment policies, is a confirmation of the fact that they trust my behavior. I was asked to be an honorary director of CFI, and invited to their last 3 meetings to speak, specifically because, as they have written me after the fact, the attendees universally appreciated my talks, my courtesy, and graciousness in spending time with the attendees. If the purpose of your report is to impugn my integrity or suggest I have a history of harassment, that too is false. As noted in one of your 'miscellaneous facts’, as a scientist I try and remain skeptical, and rely on empirical evidence, rather than allegations and innuendo. I also try and judge the facts in context. The fact that Universities and other organizations employ me or have me on their boards, or invite me to meetings is because they value my contributions and my actions.\n\nThe items you list are false or distorted. Item 1 refers falsely and inaccurately to a consensual encounter in my hotel room in 2006 where we mutually decided, in a polite discussion in fact, that taking it any further would not be appropriate, and there were respectful and platonic encounters afterwards. There is nothing to comment on in item 3, which involves an anonymous 3rd party claim because I know nothing about it, there are no details provided, and it clearly was not taken seriously enough to result in any university action. Item 4 is confusing. Are you saying that because I decided I didn’t want to go out to a bar with a group of attendees that I was harassing them? The second part did not happen. Re incident 5: The ‘female companion’ in this case is my wife, who can attest to the fact that the claim is false, which is what I wrote at the time in response to the blog in question, causing it to be taken down.\n\nIt is worth responding to Item 2 and 6 in more detail,"}]	2
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031482.txt_24890	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031482.txt	RE: Audio recording	[{"sender": "Keough, Michael", "recipients": ["Will Bohlen", "King, Kathryn", "Miller, Michael", "Katelyn Wohlford", "Y. Alp Aslandogan", "Weingarten", "Remzi Kulen", "Weinstein, Jason", "Osman Oz.", "David Marin", "Cilings", "Drake, William"], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:28 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": "USA TODAY and Al Arabiya as well:\n\nhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2016/08/05/cleric-extradition-turkey-coup/88288220/\n\nhttp://english.alarabiya.net/en/News/middle-east/2016/08/05/US-evaluating-new-Turkish-documents-on-Gulen.html"}, {"sender": "Will Bohlen", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Friday, August 05, 2016 1:27 PM", "subject": "RE: Audio recording", "body": ""}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030432.txt_24897	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030432.txt	Interesting	[{"sender": "Glenn Dubin", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, April 15 2018 05:01 PM", "subject": "Interesting", "body": "https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/michael-cohen-and-the-end-stage-of-the-trump-presidency/amp? twitter impression=true"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033383.txt_24898	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033383.txt	Re:	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "2/10/2011 3:02:14 PM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I have heard some things about it. \nB of A has note on house and the land across the street now subdivided into lots (a few acres each) called Vineyard \nEstates. \nFarm Credit Bank has note on winery and equipment. \nTrump has tried to make a deal with the lenders but didnt. He may bid. \nI'll find out current status."}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["paul prosperi"], "timestamp": "Thu, Feb 10, 2011 7:56 am", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "I think kluge virgnia property goes to auction next week„ we should get details"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029163.txt_24899	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029163.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Robert Trivers", "recipients": ["Haig, David <dh10@fas.harvard.edu>", "Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 11:22 PM", "subject": "<no subject>", "body": "dear men \ni am writing you both because i am attaching a still not-quite-complete response to Peter Richerson, a gene-culture co-\nevolutionist—without the genes \ni do so because four lines down i tell the \"Gruterites\"—Gordon Getty's echo chamber—that i have added you two to the \nlist \nso here is your chance to say \"no way\" and i will delete that from the message and likewise not ask Gruter's assistant to \nadd your names to the list \nhaving said that, i find Gordon's missives much less burdensome than those from EDGE and certainly without the \negomaniacal nonsense that infects John Brockman—the key is to get the brightest minds in a room and have them tell \neach other what they think is most important—or some such nonsense \nneither David nor i can think of a single scientific advance achieved that way—most of what we do is simply \nconcentrated sustained thought directed toward the foundations of a problem \ni doubt Jeffrey has made a huge amount of money via the EDGE program \nunless you say otherwise, i will shortly send you the key Getty missives in which he asserts, i believe correctly, that \nTrump is an archetypal narcissistic psychopath—or whatever the precise term is—and that he must be opposed with full \nforce on that basis \nmeanwhile, David has heard plenty about you Jeffrey, a financial/mathematical mind of exceptional quality and you \nshould know that David is one of the very top evolutionary geneticists still breathing and my teacher on every detail \nlarge and small \nin haste and all best \nbob"}, {"sender": "Haig, David", "recipients": ["Robert Trivers", "Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/19/2018 9:10:54 AM", "subject": "Re: ", "body": "Hi Bob (and hello Jeffrey), \n\nI would be happy at the moment not to be on another mailing list. There are just too many different things I am trying to \nattend to (including imprinted green beards), \n\nDavid"}]	2
IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027028.txt_24906	IMAGES-009-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027028.txt	Fwd: Pritzker Alert	[{"sender": "Pritzker, Tom", "recipients": ["jeevacation@gmail.com"], "timestamp": "5/23/2013 3:15:37 AM", "subject": "Fwd: Pritzker Alert", "body": "I clearly did something wrong in my last life to have to deal w this bullshit. AND I warned her."}, {"sender": "Eisenberg, Marshall", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Fwd: Pritzker Alert", "body": "Sent from my iPhone"}, {"sender": "Kaczorowski, Monica M.", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "May 22, 2013, 8:54:07 PM CDT", "subject": "Pritzker Alert", "body": ""}]	3
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033039.txt_24913	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033039.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "9/20/2017 10:34:14 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "no need :)"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 21, 2017, at 1:17 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "the book worked. :)"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed [anasalrasheed@ii]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 6:26 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "thnx jeff ..im prayingpiabid"}, {"sender": "Anas Alrasheed [anasalrasheed@ii]", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 5:57 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "only for you .. trump is on the phone today .. it is possible any minute that all parties will be on one table in\nnew york including my dear old man to put an end to this"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Anas Alrasheed"], "timestamp": "Sep 20, 2017, at 11:51 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Im certain you understand - I'm sure you will have a great new year . No need to respond"}]	5
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030788.txt_24914	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030788.txt	ny times freudian	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "5/9/2018 10:57:12 AM", "subject": "ny times freudian", "body": "Having shed or sidelined some of the top advisers who held him back in the past, Mr. Trump gives the\nappearance of a leader liberated at last to follow the china-breaking instincts that have long animated his\napproach to the world even as they troubled diplomats and national security veterans of both parties."}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030950.txt_24918	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030950.txt	Re: Jawbone/Mort	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 8:17 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Jawbone/Mort", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "6 Sep 2012, at 11:52", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Til review all in detail , when i land tonight , in ny for the next week, you?"}, {"sender": "Ian Osborne Po", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:00 PM", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Are you back now in NY?\n\nI'm in London but staying up to watch the Obama speech. Hosain's really keen to close this out by Monday...\nIt would help me a lot if we can finish this for once and for all.\n\nI'm in Munich Saturday, then St. Petersburg and Moscow with Eike Sunday-Tuesday (we've got some terrific\nmeetings lined up), London Wednesday-Thursday (including Mubadala board meeting Wed.) and then heading\nto SF next Friday 14th.... you will arrive on the 16th? Shall we do Peter Thiel for drinks then?\n\nBest wishes,\n\nJan"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey Epstein", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "7 Sep 2012, at 03:20", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "yes, who else ,? im meeting with sinofsky, , i think he wants to do different things. chinese may be\ndifficult becuase of us secuirty cleraence"}, {"sender": "Ian Osborne", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "9/7/2012 2:40:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jawbone/Mort", "body": "What else are you interested in? Peter is best for currency; maybe Reid Hoffman (fatty at LinkedIn) or Dave\nMorin (Path) or Drew Houston (Dropbox).\n\nI do believe China offers the best opportunities for Sinofsky. Problem is after Windows, pretty much everything\nelse in the US is a step down. No-one else is building an OS. Alibaba or Xiaomi in China are. But if he wants to\nstay in the US, then probably the best options are Facebook (who may one day do their own OS), Palantir (Peter\nThiel's), Yahoo (where Marissa is aggressively seeking out senior talent). Then of course, there is Apple and\nGoogle - but I assume he doesn't want to be a traitor to Microsoft?"}]	5
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029611.txt_24924	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029611.txt	Re: Disaster but maybe i	[{"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 1:59 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "guy 3 seems to be in London for weekend which is why my visit cut short.\nI got mad. Didn't send angry note after call though.\nThis is a ridiculous activity."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 2:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "how was it communicated to you?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "We talked on phone. Then \"I can't talk later\". Dint think I can talk tomorrow\".\nI said what are you up to. She said \"I'm busy\". I said awfully coy u are.\nAnd then I said. Did u really rearrange the weekend we were going to be together because guy number 3 was coming\"\nShe said no his schedule changed after we changed our plans.\nI said ok I got to go call me when u feel like it. Tone was not of good feeling.\nI dint want to be in a gift giving competition while being the friend without benefits.\nThink time to just stay away for a while. If there is potential here she 11 find way back.\nI think I'm too eager weak at this point. The Prada thing by someone else is natural. By me seems desperate.\nHad good sense not to send off a note.\nShe must be very confused or maybe wants to cut me off but wants professional connection a lot and so holds to it.\nI think life as stand by in case she needs leverage against another guy sucks.\nBut I get when I think about it stay cool."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 3:19 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "shes smart. making you pay for past errors.. ignore the daddy im going to go out with the motorcycle guy, . you reacted well.. annoyed shows caring. , no whining showed strentgh."}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 3:57 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "This guy different. Maybe married or old or something. I sense from body language she is really attracted but he is unsuitable as partner.\nI can hardly be possessive under circumstances but schedule changing because she gets a better offer is not acceptable.\nIf I say this she will rage back about times I changed plans because of family and work constraints.\nShe knew I was upset. I think significant chance she 11 send note saying this may not be fair to you why Not take time off or that she will say this.\nIn her way very tough.\nBut nothing for now.\nR from my iPhone\nLarry"}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 4:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Just send, happy for the time we spent together- have fun see you soon"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Doesnt work I talked to her for 45 minutes."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 5:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "And?"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 5:16 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "No I meant that thanking her will be wierd because we had 45 minutes of friendly convo before the bit I described.\nI'll wait till tmrw and send her some article and then say some version of your msg.\nAt some point need more firmness though."}, {"sender": "J <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mar 16, 2019, at 5:27 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Firm delivered through humor"}, {"sender": "Larry Summers", "recipients": ["J [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "3/16/2019 9:38:20 PM", "subject": "Re: Disaster but maybe i", "body": "Figuring out how.\nCould say she has now used up 80 percent of what she was owed through my changes in plan.\nOr say xi changes meeting w trump.\nI think she is tired of this alas.\nSustaining w secrecy hard."}]	11
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032937.txt_24928	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032937.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Larry Summers"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 8:22:53 PM", "subject": null, "body": "http://www.cbsnews.com/news/tom-barrack-donald-trump-presidency-healing-the-nation/"}]	1
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029848.txt_24930	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029848.txt	Trump	[{"sender": "Richard Kahn [i", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/26/2017 2:16:35 PM", "subject": "Trump", "body": "love his negotiating style as he makes me look soft..\n\nPresident Donald Trump threatened Thursday to\ncancel a meeting with Mexican President Enrique\nPena Nieto after Pena Nieto reiterated that Mexico\nwould not pay for a border wall and suggested he\n\ncould cancel the meeting.\n\nDonald J. Trump\nv¥ @realDonaldTrump\n\nThe U.S. has a 60 billion dollar trade deficit with Mexico. It has been a one-sided deal from the beginning of\nNAFTA with massive numbers...\n\nDonald J. Trump\nv¥ @realDonaldTrump\n\nof jobs and companies lost. If Mexico is unwilling to pay for the badly needed wall, then it would be better to\ncancel the upcoming meeting."}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033011.txt_24931	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033011.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Jabor Y."], "timestamp": "6/17/2017 4:31:26 PM", "subject": null, "body": "https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/16/donald-trump-palm-beach-doctor/"}]	1
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030978.txt_24938	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030978.txt	Re: FW: Reporter question	[{"sender": "Kate Briquelet", "recipients": ["Martin Weinberg"], "timestamp": "Wednesday, May 29, 2019 12:34 PM", "subject": "Re: Reporter question", "body": "Hi Marty,\n\nHope all is well. Noticed this Guardian story about Michael Wolff's new book, which states Donald Trump purchased a Palm Beach property Mr. Epstein had planned to buy, behind Mr. Epstein's back. And that Mr. Epstein threatened to expose Trump's shady real estate deals. Do you know anything about this? Does Mr. Epstein have any knowledge of illegal or suspicious dealings by President Trump?\n\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/28/bannon-trump-organization-criminal-enterprise-comments-michael-wolff-book\n\nAlso, we plan on running a story this Friday about the Crime Victims' Rights Act suit, and the Jane Does' proposed remedies. The alleged victims want the U.S. Attorney's Office to rescind the immunity provisions in the NPA, and to pursue a prosecution against Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators. Can you comment on this?\n\nThanks so much!"}, {"sender": "Martin G. Weinberg", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Wed, May 29, 2019 at 12:45 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}, {"sender": "J [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Martin G. Weinberg"], "timestamp": "5/29/2019 4:47:32 PM", "subject": "Re: FW: Reporter question", "body": ""}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030368.txt_24948	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030368.txt	Fwd: draft	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2018 8:51:55 PM", "subject": "Fwd: draft", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella <>", "Brad Wechsler <"], "timestamp": "Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:08 PM", "subject": "draft", "body": "phaidon and art space. combined basis 96 million, ( reviewed with brad and joe.) . add ten for restructuring . basis 106. mi. subtract total sale price, for both, lets say approx $8 - 15m . leaving loss of between 90 and 98 million long term loss. . AMT rate 28 % obama. tax 3.8%. city and state 12% total aprox 43 %. tax rate. savings 38.7 - 44 m"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031710.txt_24954	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031710.txt	Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein	[{"sender": "Darren Indyke", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "10/13/2016 5:48:10 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}, {"sender": "Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein"], "timestamp": "October 13, 2016 at 12:44:49 PM EDT", "subject": "Google Alert - Jeffrey Epstein", "body": ""}]	2
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019307.txt_24977	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019307.txt	null	[{"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "22 lug 2018, alle ore 15:38", "subject": null, "body": "What does this say???"}, {"sender": "Maria Luisa", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon <>", "Preate Alexandra qq"], "timestamp": "July 22, 2018 at 9:11:58 AM EDT", "subject": null, "body": "<PHOTO-2018-07-22-10-02-17.jpg>"}]	2
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028533.txt_24980	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028533.txt	Re: Jed Rubenfeld	[{"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Good morning! \nJed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus \nadjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend's unhappy situation? If so, happy to make the \nconnection. \nHugs, Ken"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "thx"}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Can you talk? Impt."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above the law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely to \ngive king like powers to a president. on one above the law. I would like lunch pail joe to come away and \nthink, this guy is smart . I understood. lets see what he writes about the clintons. \nsomeone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose a vote, that is true , but \nwould make little sense for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the allowed civil depo setting \nprecedent for criminal process , is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down, again, and suggesting \nthat you can sue your neighbor, even if you neighbor is the president. makes little sense that the you can be \nindicted for assaulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . at \nsome point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you were that the clinton and betty curries' \ntrashcan story, was reopened. ."}, {"sender": "Starr, Ken", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "Wise counsel. Thx!"}, {"sender": "Jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Starr, Ken"], "timestamp": "8/22/2018 7:23:38 PM", "subject": "Re: Jed Rubenfeld", "body": "i read turley,s piece on same subject / federalist papers etc. too much in the weeds. average joe. not sure \nwhat he concluded"}]	7
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033005.txt_24983	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033005.txt	Re: Still in NYC	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:07 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "I've been cancelled on for today. Appears everybody gone to ground. Seems Priebus decision expected."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:28 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "New York tonight"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Breakfast?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:24 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Colonoscopy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:25 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Who is your colonoscopy man?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:26 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "Krumholtz"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:46 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "His son was in my son's class at Collegiate."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:54:10 PM", "subject": "Re: Still in NYC", "body": "https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trum\n-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-\nsardinia?CMP=share btn fb"}]	8
IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021420.txt_24990	IMAGES-006-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021420.txt	URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment	[{"sender": "Peter Aldhos", "recipients": ["Dr. Krauss"], "timestamp": "December 10, 2017 at 5:12:27 PM PST", "subject": "URGENT: BuzzFeed News inquiry re allegations of sexual harassment", "body": "As you know, I’m a reporter for BuzzFeed News who has been investigating sexual misconduct allegations against you. As we've already discussed by email, I’d very much like to interview you about these allegations in detail.\n\nIn particular, you stated in an email sent on Nov 13 that two universities had investigated an incident (# 6 below). You claimed that “both Universities independently concluded that the report was unsubstantiated and fabricated with malicious intent.” We are not aware that either university concluded fabrication or malicious intent, so if you have evidence to support this assertion, we would like to see and discuss it.\n\nThe story concerns your actions towards students while a professor of physics at Case Western Reserve University, as well as your conduct in non-academic settings as a prominent figure in the skeptics movement. I am reporting this story along with two of my colleagues on the science desk, Azeen Ghorayshi and Virginia Hughes.\n\nOur story is about several allegations of sexual misconduct dating from 2006 to 2016 (see full details below). Our reporting also goes into how the various institutions you have been affiliated with — Case Western, Arizona State University, the Australian National University, the New College of the Humanities, and the Center for Inquiry, for which you serve as an honorary member of the board of directors — have handled complaints and concerns about your behavior during this time.\n\nOur story is corroborated by emails, university documents, official complaints, testimony from victims and eyewitnesses, and interviews with more than two dozen of your current and former academic colleagues, students, and peers in the skeptics movement.\n\nI wanted to offer you the opportunity to comment and/or respond to the main facts we plan to publish. If you wish to comment on any of the below findings, we need to hear from you as soon as possible. We are planning on publishing our story Tuesday morning, Eastern US Time.\n\nBased on our reporting, this is what we plan to publish:\n\nIncident 1:\n\n° In November of 2006, at an event launching the new Center for Inquiry in Washington D.C., you met a volunteer for CFI D.C.\n\n° At the event, you asked for her business card. Later, you followed her as she was leaving and asked her if she was “of age.”\n\n° Later, you emailed her to invite her to dinner.\n\n° You planned to dine with her in the restaurant at the Washington D.C. hotel where you were staying.\n\n° You told her to come up to your room first because you needed to finish some work.\n\n° In your hotel room, you seemed in no rush to leave. You ordered a cheese plate, and later champagne, despite her suggestion that you go down to dinner.\n\n° You then made a comment about her eye makeup, getting very close to her face.\n\n° You then lifted her by her arms, and pushed her onto the bed beneath you, forcibly kissing her and trying to pull down the crotch of her tights.\n\n° She struggled to push you off her.\n\n° You said, “When I was in college I could never get a girl that looked like you.”"}]	1
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt_24993	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031705.txt	Fwd: Why not in Vegas?	[{"sender": null, "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "8/2/2012 5:57:19 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Why not in Vegas?", "body": "I'll make this quick. I have one question and one observation about Mitt Romney's visit to Israel. The question is this: Since the whole trip was not about learning anything but about how to satisfy the political whims of the right-wing, super pro-Bibi Netanyahu, American Jewish casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, why didn't they just do the whole thing in Las Vegas? I mean, it was all about money anyway — how much Romney would abase himself by saying whatever the Israeli right wanted to hear and how big a jackpot of donations Adelson would shower on the Romney campaign in return. Really, Vegas would have been so much more appropriate than Jerusalem. They could have constructed a plastic Wailing Wall and saved so much on gas.\n\nThe observation is this: Much of what is wrong with the U.S.-Israel relationship today can be found in that Romney trip. In recent years, the Republican Party has decided to make Israel a wedge issue. In order to garner more Jewish (and evangelical) votes and money, the G.O.P. decided to \"out-pro-Israel\" the Democrats by being even more unquestioning of Israel. This arms race has pulled the Democratic Party to the right on the Middle East and has basically forced the Obama team to shut down the peace process and drop any demands that Israel freeze settlements. This, in turn, has created a culture in Washington where State Department officials, not to mention politicians, are reluctant to even state publicly what is U.S. policy — that settlements are \"an obstacle to peace\" — for fear of being denounced as anti-Israel.\n\nAdd on top of that, the increasing role of money in U.S. politics and the importance of single donors who can write megachecks to \"super PACs\" — and the fact that the main Israel lobby, Aipac, has made itself the feared arbiter of which lawmakers are \"pro\" and which are \"anti-Israel\" and, therefore, who should get donations and who should not — and you have a situation in which there are almost no brakes, no red lights, around Israel coming from America anymore. No wonder settlers now boast on op-ed pages that the game is over, they've won, the West Bank will remain with Israel forever — and they don't care what absorbing all of its Palestinians will mean for Israel's future as a Jewish democracy.\n\nIt is into this environment that Romney wandered to add more pandering and to declare how he will be so much nicer to Israel than big, bad Obama. This is a canard. On what matters to Israel's survival — advanced weaponry and intelligence — Defense Minister Ehud Barak told CNN on Monday, \"I should tell you honestly that this administration under President Obama is doing in regard to our security more than anything that I can remember in the past.\"\n\nWhile Romney had time for a $50,000-a-plate breakfast with American Jewish donors in Jerusalem, with Adelson at his elbow, he did not have two hours to go to Ramallah, the seat of the Palestinian Authority, to meet with its president, Mahmoud Abbas, or to share publicly any ideas on how he would advance the peace process. He did have time, though, to point out to his Jewish hosts that Israelis are clearly more culturally entrepreneurial than Palestinians. Israel today is an amazing beehive of innovation — thanks, in part, to an influx of Russian brainpower, massive U.S. aid and smart policies. It's something Jews should be proud of But had Romney gone to Ramallah he would have seen a Palestinian beehive of entrepreneurship, too, albeit small, but not bad for a people living under occupation. Palestinian business talent also built the Persian Gulf states. In short, Romney didn't know what he was talking about.\n\nOn peace, the Palestinians' diplomacy has been a fractured mess, and I still don't know if they can be a partner for a secure two-state deal with even the most liberal Israeli government. But I do know this: It is in Israel's overwhelming interest to test, test and have the U.S. keep testing creative ideas for a two-state solution. That is what a real U.S. friend would promise to do. Otherwise, Israel could be doomed to become a kind of apartheid South Africa.\n\nAnd here is what I also know: The three U.S. statesmen who have done the most to make Israel more secure and accepted in the region all told blunt truths to every Israeli or Arab leader: Jimmy Carter, who helped forge a lasting peace between Israel and Egypt; Henry Kissinger, who built the post-1973 war disengagement agreements with Syria, Israel and Egypt; and James Baker, who engineered the Madrid peace conference. All of them knew that to make progress in this region you have to get in the face of both sides. They both need the excuse at times that \"the Americans made me do it,\" because their own politics are too knotted to move on their own.\n\nSo how about all you U.S. politicians — Republicans and Democrats — stop feeding off this conflict for political gain. Stop using this conflict as a backdrop for campaign photo-ops and fund-raisers. Stop making things even worse by telling the most hard-line Israelis everything that they want to hear, just to grovel for Jewish votes and money, while blatantly ignoring the other side. There are real lives at stake out there. If you're not going to do something constructive, stay away. They can make enough trouble for themselves on their own.\n\nSent from my iPad"}]	1
IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt_25013	IMAGES-012-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033004.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["Weingarten, Reid as"], "timestamp": "5/30/2017 7:53:55 PM", "subject": null, "body": "how did today go .. _https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/29/close-friend-trump-thomas-barrack-alleged-tax-evasion-italy-sardinia?CMP=share_btn_fb"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026024.txt_25015	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026024.txt	TR:	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jean.huguen@albertopinto.com", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "lundi 28 novembre 2016 01:23", "subject": "TR:", "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}, {"sender": "Jean HUGUEN", "recipients": ["DEE jecvecation@email.com", "I (sienna ee"], "timestamp": "28/11/2016 10:01:14", "subject": "TR:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["DEE jecvecation@email.com", "I (sienna ee"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 11:36:54 AM", "subject": "Réf. : TR:", "body": "Dear jeffrey\n\nFrom our side we could postponed the trip ,visit the 2 works from Plant Thursday the 15th and have our\nmeeting Friday the 16th all of us,but need an answer from Plant .\nPlease tell me if it is convenient for you Friday the 16th,or Thurday late afternoon\n\nThanks\n\njean"}]	3
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030369.txt_25020	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030369.txt	Fwd: so there is no misunderstanding	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jeffrey epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "4/7/2018 9:36:20 PM", "subject": "Fwd: so there is no misunderstanding", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Melanie Spinella"], "timestamp": "Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:27 AM", "subject": "so there is no misunderstanding", "body": "I have told the brads and barry,- I am done. its not a negotiation, out!! - fyi given my carlyn joslin castrucci, admonishments,- though my involvement in those - in one instance only gave a name - in another only given an eileen dictated choice btween two 250k preparers. and for castrucci, I actually sent emails that i take no responsiblity for his being hired. - however you felt strongly that I should be saddled with their outcomes .even with brad wechsler, i again said two months in, Leon, he doesnt get it. I tell you this so that you will understand that I will not interview, recommend or vet any new hire. A story - In 1993 trump and I had a friend that kept telling his pilots how to fly, and when to fly, he couldnt help himself from hiring morons as co pilots, and maintenance people based on cheapest rates. Donald and I tried and tried to talk some sense into him, to no avail. Donald and I were in aspen, sitting at little nells. when the friends plane crashed into the side of aspen mountain , klliing him and all on board,- Trump looked at me and said without a blink , I guess NOW he wishes he would have listened to us.- a metaphor for your office. . . had we not waited to the very last hour having had a six month window and tens of unasnwered text and emails re decisions needed including the 1031. you would have saved way more than you often feel obliged to argue about. . silly but i reallize you are stressed. Barry will need to sit with brad for months, to absorb all the co's , structures. cash flow, financial statments etc. I will present barry my thoughts on the overall redo , it will be the exact same email that i presented to you and brad two years.ago . accurate numbers first. and foremost. . ( last week gaming report stil funky). IT etc I pointed out some of the more glaring errors to barry to give him a flavor of what is to come. Tuesday if you like we should discuss Giacometti , and pesner . difficult to finesse him if they are filing documents that you won't. these ridiculous conversations with tons of people on the phone , removes any claim you might have to not be considered a WILLFUL NON-FILER. ( after youve been told by attnys and pwc that you should file in writing , you have NO choice ) .. worst possible result - including serious penalties up the kazoo."}]	2
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026030.txt_25021	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026030.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:11 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Thought you might be interested in this--it's suddenly made me the only liberal-media guy with access to Trump circle. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747\n\nAnd...I have a bit of an idea for you re media and Saudi friends."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im in palm beach is roger here?"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:13 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I think so."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Monday, November 28, 2016", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im here today flying to nw york tomow. if he is up to it ild love to sit with him , house or on plane if we wants a ride"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:18 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I will ask. How long in New York? Get together?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:22 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "wed and fri adn yes, Ive set you up to see the right hand of the Dep Cr Prince"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:23 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cool. great."}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": ["Michael Wolff"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:39 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "im happy to go to him. if he is shy"}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>"], "timestamp": "Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:43 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "He is not so much shy, as paranoid. I have to contact him through his wife on a burner phone, which they don't reliably check. But have queried."}, {"sender": "Michael Wolff", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/29/2016 1:19:56 PM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "They came back to New York yesterday. He would like to meet, tho wary of being seen, etc. I will work it out."}]	10
IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019312.txt_25024	IMAGES-005-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019312.txt	Re: Fw:	[{"sender": "Benjamin Harnwell", "recipients": ["Steve Bannon"], "timestamp": "Sun, 22 Jul 2018 22:01:54 +0200", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Bannon the European: He’s opening the populist fort in Brussels\n\nThe former Trump strategist arrives in Europe with \"The Movement\". Objective: an alliance between\nright-wing leaders, from Salvini to Orban in view of the 2019 elections\n\nNEW YORK. The invasion of Europe has begun. Steve Bannon, 65, the American far-right guru who\nwas Donald Trump’s right-hand man in the White House — but let go last summer following the racist\nviolence in Charlottesville — is preparing to march on Brussels. Launching, he told the Daily Beast\nhimself, a new non-profit foundation called The Movement, (Il Movimento), right in the heart of"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:26 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": ""}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 01:51:58 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "9th circle"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:57 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:58 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Hicks?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Mon, 23 Jul 2018 02:02:16 +0200", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "If you are going to play here , you’ll have to spend time , europe by remote doesn’t work . Lots and lots of face\ntime and hand holding"}, {"sender": "Steve Bannon", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "7/23/2018 12:19:09 AM", "subject": "Re: Fw:", "body": "Yes"}]	7
TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026245.txt_25057	TEXT-001-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026245.txt	Fwd: Keep the March Alive!	[{"sender": "Diane Ziman", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "1/23/2018 9:59:38 PM", "subject": "Fwd: Keep the March Alive!", "body": "Jeffrey --\nDid you see my son's email on Sunday? \nI was so proud to see him speak at the Women's March this weekend, joining thousands of passionate \nFloridians who want real change in our state, and across the country. \nBut we both know that change doesn't come easy. And there are a lot of folks in Tallahassee that want to \nkeep things the same as usual. \nWe can't afford the status quo so they can have their way. We need leadership that will bring the \nchange that so many have been marching for over the past year. \nCan I count on you to help my son bring that change to Tallahassee? \nClick here to join his campaign today, and help him do the right thing for our neighbors \nacross the state. \n#ThatsMyBoy \n- Diane"}, {"sender": "Philip Levine", "recipients": [], "timestamp": null, "subject": "Keep the March Alive!", "body": "I spent the day with thousands of fellow Floridians, celebrating the one year anniversary of the \nWomen's March. \nI was inspired by the crowds, their voice, and their passion. \nEmpowering women in the age of Trump is an essential part of moving this country forward. But \nthat means moving forward on issues that have long been stalled -equal pay, better education, \nand a living wage. \nIn 2018, we have the chance to move these issues forward, and I'm asking for your help in \nmakins it ha en. \nIf the crowds we saw in St. Petersburg, Miami, and dozens of other cities across this country are \nany indication, we have the momentum! \nNow we need to bring it to Tallahassee. \nSincerely, \nPhilip"}]	2
IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029849.txt_25061	IMAGES-010-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029849.txt	Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short	[{"sender": "Sultan Bin Sulayern", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "9/18/2015 5:26:12 AM", "subject": "Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short", "body": "Fareed Zakaria: Trump sells America short\n\nDear Donald Trump: China, Japan and Mexico are not “killing us”\nBy Fareed Zakaria, Thursday, September 17, 2015\n\nDonald Trump’s presidential bid is centered on the promise of his personal talents. He says he’s the “most successful\nperson ever to run for the presidency, by far.” (George Washington and Dwight Eisenhower, sit down!) But if there is an\nidea animating his candidacy, it is that the United States is being badly beaten by its economic competitors. In his speech\non foreign policy this week, Trump explained that America is being bested by countries such as China, Japan and Mexico\nbecause their leaders are “smarter, more cunning and sharper than our leaders.” “They’re killing us,” he often says.\n\nThis is an odd moment to make these charges because the reality is almost entirely the opposite. The United States is\nmore dominant on the global economic landscape than at any point since the heyday of Bill Clinton’s presidency —\nperhaps even more so.\n\nLast quarter, the U.S. economy grew at a 3.7 percent clip. Annual growth now is almost twice that of Europe and four\ntimes that of Japan. Unemployment is at 5.1 percent, the lowest in seven years. The deficit as a percentage of gross\ndomestic product (2.8 percent in 2014) is at its lowest since 2007.\n\n“The U.S. has come out of the 2008 crisis better than all the others,” says Ruchir Sharma, head of global macro investing\nat Morgan Stanley. “Americans have reduced their debt burden more than the Europeans, while China’s debt has\nskyrocketed to extremely dangerous levels. If you look outside of China, U.S. growth is actually faster even than the\nemerging markets. Since the 2008 crisis, U.S. equity markets have outperformed all others — in fact 9 out of the 10 most\nvaluable companies in the world are now American. The dollar is the currency of choice. Global growth is not what it\nused to be, but in a bad neighborhood, the U.S. has the best house by far.” Sharma points out that for the past four\nyears, the United States’ share of global GDP has increased while Europe’s and Japan’s have moved down.\n\nWhen \| was in Europe last week, businessmen there were concerned with what they saw as a new level of U.S.\ndominance in everything from technology to entertainment to finance. Consider America’s big banks. They were at the\nepicenter of the financial crisis and were badly battered by it. Since then, bankers have complained that they’ve faced\nuncertainty about government policies, overzealous regulators trying to compensate for their laxness before the crisis\nand the unwieldy burdens of the Dodd-Frank law.\n\nWell, U.S. banks today are more dominant than ever. The Wall Street Journal notes that in the past five years, JPMorgan\nChase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have increased in value by $254.6 billion. In the\nsame period, their European competitors, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, UBS and Royal Bank of Scotland added\njust $9.5 billion. In July, Barclays Chairman John McFarlane was asked if America’s banks were eating European lenders’\nlunch. He replied: “They are doing a good job of it.” He added that the U.S. banks “are the only ones that really claim to\nbe global and successful.”"}]	1
TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt_25062	TEXT-002-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032936.txt	null	[{"sender": "jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]", "recipients": ["jean.huguen", "Lesley Groff"], "timestamp": "11/28/2016 12:22:35 AM", "subject": null, "body": "can you delay your trip one week, . trump related issues occupying my time. say 13 14 instead"}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026018.txt_25063	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026018.txt	Re:	[{"sender": "ee", "recipients": ["jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "11/12/2016 9:23:22 AM", "subject": "Re:", "body": "Sorry in the conference room listening to the Portuguese prime minister ....\n\nNthg revolutionary really .\n\nWas watching tv last night - either Trump is a misunderstood genius or it s going to be complicated ..."}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "12 Nov 2016, at 09:35", "subject": "Re:", "body": "cam you speak now?"}, {"sender": "Ariane de Rothschild", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:29 Pi", "subject": "Re:", "body": "I see who you re talking about . Brilliant , but I was told his wife didn t want to move from London esp not\nGeneva . Do you mind asking him ?"}, {"sender": "jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com>", "recipients": [], "timestamp": "11 Nov 2016, at 22:48", "subject": "Re:", "body": "met a really intersting banker for youto meet, former cfo deutsch bank, formercfo bmw german, born\nin south america."}]	4
IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030951.txt_25071	IMAGES-011-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030951.txt	Jawbone/Mort	[{"sender": "Jacoby, Craig", "recipients": ["Darren Indyke", "Hosain Rahman", "lan Osborne", "Jacoby, Craig"], "timestamp": "September 5, 2012 7:27:21 PM EDT", "subject": "Jawbone/Mort", "body": "Hi Darren,\n\nJust checking back in on the Jawbone investment. Thanks for sending across your comments. If possible, we would like to avoid a situation where we recirculate the investment agreements in place with Jawbone’s other investors, and our hope is that we can accommodate as many of your comments as possible short of taking that step.\n\nWe think that the best way to address your comments would be to have Jawbone enter into a new purchase agreement covering both the preferred and the common stock being sold to Mort. Jawbone would make its representations and warranties anew upon the closing of the purchase agreement, so Mort would not be relying on the reps made back in June 2011, nor on the schedule of exceptions prepared in connection with the initial closing. The new purchase agreement would have the same closing conditions that applied to the initial closing of the JP Morgan investment.\n\nGiven the affiliation between Mort, Hedosophia and Apoletto and their collective investment in preferred and common stock, we also want to propose that Mort (along with the other two parties) be treated as a “Major Investor” under the Investor Rights Agreement so long as their collective holdings of preferred and common stock remains at least equal to 2,000,000 shares. We intend to do this with a side letter that would not require the signature of the other parties to those documents. You have already seen the draft amendment that would expand the definition of “Registrable Securities” in the investor rights agreement to include the common stock being purchased by Mort, and we do anticipate that our principal investors will quickly sign that document once we circulate it.\n\nYou had indicated a desire to have JP Morgan approve the sale of Series 5 Preferred outside of the existing purchase agreement. As I indicated to you on the phone, we do not think that this is necessary, but we are willing to obtain from them an acknowledgement to that effect prior to the closing of Mort’s investment.\n\nWe do believe, however, that various of your other requests for change in the investor documents would require a broader amendment and restatement of the applicable documents, and some of them concern business points that were the subject of specific negotiation with JP Morgan and others of our investors in prior rounds. These points include your comments to the drag along rights, the registration rights, the information rights and the venue provisions. We would like those terms to remain as we had negotiated them with JP Morgan.\n\nIf you are comfortable with the approach outlined in this email, we can get you draft documents, including a draft updated Schedule of Exceptions, tomorrow for your review and approval. Please let me know."}]	1
IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511.txt_25074	IMAGES-008-HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511.txt	poetry and science	[{"sender": "Lisa New is", "recipients": ["Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com]"], "timestamp": "12/2/2014 6:29:16 PM", "subject": "poetry and science", "body": "Dear Jeffrey,\n\nApropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was\ninterested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV\non a broad range of topics.\n\n500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin\nimmediately, Jan 1. . I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a\nsession on metaphor at the edges of fields.\n\nINote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology,\nzoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David\nMalan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post\nproduction.\n\nI am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics\n\nLisa\n\nPoetry in America for Teachers II : The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky\n\nCombining study of poetry with study of science, environment and the visual arts. Materials include\nhundreds archival images and live footage shot in\n\nCape Cod, Nantucket, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, Jamaica, Aspen, California, Papua New Guinea\nincluding oceans, ponds, marshes, birds, fish mountains, coral reefs, forests as well in some major collections\n(HMNH etc)\n\nwith author Michael Pollan on Joel Barlow (and colonial agriculture)"}]	1