Split (3)

train · 9.09M rows

text stringlengths 1 32.7k
Whereas the behaviour of animals, even of the higher ones, consists almost entirely of purely instinctive actions, innate modes of response to a limited number of situations; man has an indefinitely great capacity for acquiring new modes of response, and so of adapting an almost indefinite variety of situations himself in new and more complex ways .
Physical environment affects the mental qualities of a people in three ways: firstly, it directly influences the minds of each generation; secondly, it moulds the mental constitution by natural selection, adapting itself the race ; thirdly, it exerts indirect influence by determining the occupations and modes of life and, through these, the social organisation of a people.
But what gives the assumption that these new qualities are the direct effects of climate special support is that these qualities, the physical at least, seem to be approximations to the type of the Red Indians, the aboriginal inhabitants.
He points out that the thick hazy state of the air, so common in our islands, renders vague and dull all outlines and colours, so that the eye does not receive that wealth of well-defined hues and forms which give some more sunny lands , such as the mediterranean coast lands so great a charm .
The thick air, the monotony of vague form and colour, drive reflection upon itself the mind ; and in art the objects of nature serve merely as symbols by aid of which the mind seeks to express its own broodings.
It may well be that certain qualities of the Red Indian, for example, the straight dark hair and prominent cheek bones, are what the biologists call ‘dominant characters’ when the Indian is crossed with the European; that is, qualities which always assert the exclusion of the corresponding quality of the other race involved in the cross themselves in the offspring, .
Such peoples have failed to acquire its own sake the energy which leads men to delight in activity , not merely because a hot moist climate inclines directly to indolence, but rather because the prime necessities of life are to be had almost without labour; the heat dispenses with the necessity for clothing and shelter, while the hot sun and the moisture provide an abundance of vegetable food in response to a minimum of labour.
Civilisation first developed in the sub-tropical regions, in which the abundance of nature first gave men leisure to devote things of the mind , to contemplation and inquiry themselves ; while the northern races were still battling as savages against the inclemency of the climate, were still being ruthlessly weeded out by the rigorousness of the physical environment, and so were being adapted to it, that is to say, were being rendered capable of sustained and vigorous effort.
In the feudal period which preceded its formation, there was considerable local independence; but the feudal system was due to the dominant influence of Frankish chiefs, of the same race as our Saxon forefathers, who overran most of France as a ruling caste, but did not contribute the population any large element , and whose blood therefore has been largely swamped.
He wrote “The French colonist deliberates with his wife upon everything that he proposes to do; often the plans fall to the ground through lack of agreement. ” “To visit one’s neighbours, to chat with them, is for the French an habitual need so imperious that on all the frontier of Louisiana and Canada you will not find a single French colonist established beyond sight of his neighbour’s home. ” “On the other hand, the English colonist, slow and taciturn, passes the whole day continuously at work; at breakfast he coldly gives his wife his orders ; . . . and goes forth to labour. . . .
The nobles were in consequence too weak to set up their own power against that of the king, and therefore they called their aid in resisting the power of the king the people ; hence, the people early acquired rights and privileges and the habit of organised resistance to the central authority.
“The practice of subinfeudation, became in France almost universal. ” The great lords subgranted lesser lords parts of their lands , and these again to others, and so on-“thus forming a long chain of dependence, and, as it were, organising submission into a system. ” In this country, on the other hand, the practice was actively checked.
I then drew the work of the school of le play and especially to its fundamental principle-namely attention , that, while peoples are in a state of primitive or lowly culture, their geographical or physical environment determines their occupations and, through their occupations, their social organisations, especially their domestic organisation; and that particular modes of occupation and of social organisation of a primitive people, persisting through many generations, mould the innate qualities and form the racial character.
The Celts lent this system based on personal loyalty and leadership themselves readily , owing to their lack of independence of character engendered by long ages of the patriarchal communal régime.
And when, after Russia had sold the united states Alaska in 1867 , the latter made regulations regarding the killing of seals within Behring Sea, claiming thereby jurisdiction and control over a part of the Open Sea, a conflict arose in 1886 with Great Britain, which was settled by arbitration[493] in 1893 in favour of the freedom of the Open Sea.
And they assert, secondly, that Nature does not give anybody a right to appropriate such things as may inoffensively be used by everybody and are inexhaustible, and, therefore, sufficient for all.
This power of men-of-war has given much dispute and discussion occasion , but in fact nobody denies that in case of grave suspicion this power does exist.
But every State can by its Municipal Laws enact that those of its subjects who take possession of abandoned vessels and of shipwrecked goods need not restore their owners them without salvage, [547] whether the act of taking possession occurred on the actual Open Sea or within territorial waters and on shore of the respective State.
But it is impossible to say that there is a customary or conventional rule of the Law of Nations in existence which imposes upon all States the duty of instructing their men-of-war to render foreign vessels in distress assistance , although many States order by Municipal Regulations their men-of-war to render such assistance, and although morally every vessel is bound to render assistance to another vessel in distress.
But it is impossible to say that there is a customary or conventional rule of the Law of Nations in existence which imposes upon all States the duty of instructing their men-of-war to render assistance to foreign vessels in distress, although many States order by Municipal Regulations their men-of-war to render such assistance, and although morally every vessel is bound to render another vessel in distress assistance .
[Footnote 549: According to article 11 of the draft convention concerning salvage produced by the Conference of the Maritime Committee at Brussels in September 1910--see above, note 1--"every master shall be obliged, as far as he can do so without serious danger to his vessel, his crew, or his passengers, to lend any person , even an enemy , found at sea in danger of perishing assistance .
The majority of writers confine such acts , which indeed are the normal cases of piracy piracy .
Thus, if the members of the crew revolt and convert their own use the ship and the goods thereon , they are considered to be pirates, although they have not committed an act of violence against another ship.
The crew or the whole or a part of the passengers who revolt on the Open Sea and convert their own use the vessel and her goods , commit thereby piracy, whether the vessel is private or public.
They are pirates only when the revolt is directed not merely against the master, but also against the vessel, for the purpose of converting their own use her and her goods .
The crew or passengers who, for the purpose of converting their own use a vessel and her goods , force the master through intimidation to steer another course, commit piracy as well as those who murder the master and steer the vessel themselves.
During the seventeenth century the practice of several States conceded the captor such vessel and goods as a premium.
Thus, for instance, according to the Criminal Law of England, [568] every English subject is inter alia deemed to be a pirate who gives the king's enemies aid or comfort upon the sea during a war, or who transports slaves on the High Seas.
Since serious quarrels and difficulties were caused through bumboats and floating grog-shops selling the fishermen intoxicating liquors , an International Conference took place at the Hague in 1886, where the signatory Powers of the Hague Convention concerning the fisheries in the North Sea were represented.
It is interdicted to sell persons on board of fishing vessels spirituous drinks , and these persons are prohibited from buying such drinks (article 2).
Bumboats, which wish to sell fishermen provisions , must be licensed by their flag State and must fly a white flag[575] with the letter S in black in the middle (article 3).
The United States therefore invited a pelagic sealing conference which took place at washington in 1911 the maritime Powers whose subjects are engaged in the seal fisheries , and produced a convention[580] which was signed on July 7, 1911, by which the suspension of pelagic sealing for fifteen years was agreed upon.
In 1882 France invited an international conference at paris the Powers for the purpose of regulating the protection of submarine cables.
It ought not to be possible for the following case[590] to occur, to which attention was drawn at the Berlin Conference by the delegate of the United States of America:--The American steamer Lebanon had received orders to search a wrecked vessel which offered great danger to navigation the Atlantic .
[593] There is no reason whatever for extending the subsoil beneath its bed this freedom of the Open Sea .
For how could International Law, which is a law between States, give individuals rights concerning their relations to a State?
What the Law of Nations really does concerning individuals, is to impose the duty upon all the members of the Family of Nations to grant such foreign heads of states and diplomatic envoys certain privileges , and certain rights to such foreign citizens as are on their territory.
Foreign States granting foreign individuals these rights do this by their Municipal Laws, and these rights are, therefore, not international rights, but rights derived from Municipal Laws.
When the Powers stipulated at the Berlin Congress of 1878 that the Balkan States should be recognised only under the condition that they did not impose any religious disabilities on their subjects, they lent the realisation of such an idea their arm .
And no State has a right forcibly to retain foreign citizens called home by their home State, or to prevent them from paying their home state taxes , and the like. ]
It happens, secondly, that a State promises certain natives diplomatic protection within the boundaries of Turkey and other Oriental countries .
And it must be specially emphasised that the Law of Nations does not and cannot grant every individual a right of emigration , although it is frequently maintained that it is a "natural" right of every individual to emigrate from his own State.
And, lastly, in all States naturalisation may be procured through a direct act on the part of the State granting an alien who has applied for it nationality .
It is not necessary to give examples of double nationality caused by taking domicile abroad, accepting foreign Government office, and redintegration, and it suffices merely to draw the fact that naturalisation in the narrower sense of the term is frequently a cause of double nationality , since individuals may apply for and receive naturalisation in a state without thereby losing the nationality of their home state attention .
In practice, stateless individuals are in most States treated more or less as though they were subjects of foreign States, but as a point of international legality there is no restriction whatever upon a State's maltreating any extent them .
Later on, while at Smyrna, he was seized by Austrian officials and taken on board an Austrian man-of-war with the intention of bringing austria him , to be there punished for his part in the revolution of 1848.
The question is only whether an international legal duty can be said to exist for every State to admit all parts of its territory all unobjectionable aliens .
The so-called right of asylum is nothing but the competence mentioned above of every State, and inferred from its territorial supremacy, to allow a prosecuted alien to enter and to remain on its territory under its protection, and to grant thereby him an asylum .
And if a State grants a prosecuted alien asylum , this duty becomes of special importance.
On the other hand, it cannot be denied that, especially in the case of expulsion of an alien who has been residing within the expelling State for some length of time and has established a business there, the home State of the expelled individual is by its right of protection over citizens abroad justified in making the expelling state diplomatic representations and asking for the reasons for the expulsion.
But as in strict law a State can expel even domiciled aliens without so much as giving the reasons, the refusal of the expelling State to supply the home state of the expelled alien the reasons for expulsion does not constitute an illegal, although a very unfriendly, act.
On the contrary, States have always upheld their competence to grant foreign individuals asylum as an inference from their territorial supremacy, those cases, of course, excepted which fall under stipulations of special extradition treaties, if any.
It was then and thereby that the conviction was forced upon the States of civilised humanity that it was in their common interest to surrender each other ordinary criminals regularly .
English public opinion was for many years against extradition treaties at all, considering them as a great danger to individual liberty and to the competence of every State to grant political refugees asylum .
Such States as possess no extradition laws and whose written Constitution does not mention the matter, leave their governments it to conclude extradition treaties according to their discretion.
Many States, however, as France and most other States of the European continent, have adopted the principle never to extradite a foreign state one of their subjects , but themselves to punish subjects of their own for grave crimes committed abroad.
Thus, in 1884, Great Britain surrendered germany , who , by sending from southampton forged bills of exchange to a merchant in germany as payment for goods ordered , was considered to have committed forgery and to have obtained goods by false pretences in germany one Nillins .
Thus, in 1884, Great Britain surrendered one Nillins to Germany, who, by sending from Southampton a merchant in germany forged bills of exchange as payment for goods ordered, was considered to have committed forgery and to have obtained goods by false pretences in Germany.
The Extradition Acts of 1873 and 1906 added the list:--kidnapping , false imprisonment , perjury , subornation of perjury , and bribery the following crimes .
He was, however, seized by a French policeman, who, erroneously and without further formalities, reconducted the morea him with the assistance of individuals from the vessel who had raised a hue-and-cry.
It was then that the term "political crime" arose, and article 120 of the French Constitution of 1793 granted foreigners exiled from their home country " for the cause of liberty asylum . "
The fact that several political fugitives were surrendered by the Governor of Gibraltar to Spain created a storm of indignation in Parliament in 1815, where Sir James Mackintosh proclaimed the principle that no nation ought to refuse political fugitives asylum .
As Belgium, which had seceded from the Netherlands in 1830 and became recognised and neutralised by the Powers in 1831, owed revolt her very existence , she felt the duty of making it a principle of her Municipal Law to grant asylum to foreign political fugitives, a principle which was for the first time put into practice in the treaty of extradition concluded in 1834 between Belgium and France.
Great Britain and the other free countries felt in honour bound not to surrender the persecution of their governments such exiled patriots , but to grant them an asylum.
It suffices to state that whereas many writers call such crime "political" as was committed from a political motive, others call "political" any crime committed for a political purpose; again, others recognise such crime only as "political" as was committed from a political motive and at the same time for a political purpose; and, thirdly, some writers confine certain offences against the state only the term "political crime" , as high treason, lèse-majesté, and the like.
A free country can never agree to surrender their prosecuting home state foreigners for deeds done in the interest of the same freedom and liberty which the subjects of such free country enjoy.
On the one hand, the latter is quite insufficient, for it restricts murder of heads of states and members of their families only its stipulations .
And it need not be feared that such Court will grant a murderer asylum , incendiary, and the like, unless convinced that the deed was really political.
Thus Russia, Austria, and Prussia refused until 1848 isabella , queen of spain , who had come to the throne as an infant in 1833 recognition .
[Footnote 705: A celebrated case happened on November 10, 1656, in France, when Christina, Queen of Sweden, although she had already abdicated, sentenced death her grand equerry, Monaldeschi, , and had him executed by her bodyguard. ]
Nothing, of course, prevents the Municipal Law of a State from granting a foreign deposed or abdicated monarch the same privileges as to a foreign Sovereign, but the Law of Nations does not exact any such courtesy.
As regards exterritoriality, I believe that future contingencies will create the practice on the part of the States of granting presidents and members of their suite this privilege as in the case of monarchs.
No State need send diplomatic envoys at all, although practically all States do at least occasionally send such envoys, and most States send many other states permanent envoys .
Thus, according to the Peace Treaty of Kainardgi of 1774 between Russia and Turkey, the two half-Sovereign principalities of Moldavia and Wallachia had the right of sending foreign powers Chargés d'Affaires .
But it is impossible for foreign States to receive diplomatic envoys from both claimants to the headship of the same State, or to send both of them diplomatic envoys .
For States very often send one another special envoys on occasion of coronations, weddings, funerals, jubilees, and the like; and it is also usual to send envoys to announce a fresh accession to the throne.
As soon as the envoy arrives at his destination, he sends the foreign office the copy in order to make his arrival officially known.
(1) If forthwith upon a proclamation of neutrality being issued by Her Majesty he gives the secretary of state notice that he is so building, causing to be built, or equipping such ship, and furnishes such particulars of the contract and of any matters relating to, or done, or to be done under the contract as may be required by the Secretary of State:
If during the continuance of any war in which Her Majesty may be neutral, any ship, goods, or merchandize captured as prize of war within the territorial jurisdiction of Her Majesty, in violation of the neutrality of this realm, or captured by any ship which may have been built, equipped, commissioned, or despatched, or the force of which may have been augmented, contrary to the provisions of this Act are brought within the limits of Her Majesty's dominions by the captor, or any agent of the captor, or by any person having come into possession thereof with the knowledge that the same was prize of war so captured as aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the original owner of such prize, or his agent, or for any person authorised in that behalf by the Government of the foreign state to which such owner belongs, to make the court of admiralty application for seizure and detention of such prize, and the court shall, on due proof of the facts, order such prize to be restored.
The court may in cases where no proceedings are pending for its condemnation release any ship detained under this section on the owner giving the satisfaction of the court security that the ship shall not be employed contrary to this Act, notwithstanding that the applicant may have failed to establish to the satisfaction of the court that the ship was not and is not being built, commissioned, or intended to be despatched contrary to this Act.
The Secretary of State or the chief executive authority may likewise release any ship detained under this section on the owner giving the satisfaction of such secretary of state or chief executive authority security that the ship shall not be employed contrary to this Act, or may release the ship without such security if the Secretary of State or chief executive authority think fit so to release the same.
Where it is represented to any local authority, as defined by this Act, and such local authority believes the representation, that there is a reasonable and probable cause for believing that a ship within Her Majesty's dominions has been or is being built, commissioned, or equipped contrary to this Act, and is about to be taken beyond the limits of such dominions, or that a ship is about to be despatched contrary to this Act, it shall be the duty of such local authority to detain such ship, and forthwith to communicate the secretary of state or chief executive authority the fact of such detention .
The Registrar of every Vice-Admiralty Prize Court shall, on the First Day of January and First Day of July in every year, make out a Return (in such Form as the Lords of the Admiralty from Time to Time direct) of all cases adjudged in the Court since the last half-yearly Return, and shall with all convenient Speed send the registrar of the high court of admiralty , who shall keep the same in the registry of that court , and who shall , as soon as conveniently may be the same , send a Copy of the Returns of each Half Year to the Lords of the Admiralty, who shall lay the same before both Houses of Parliament.
The Registrar of every Vice-Admiralty Prize Court shall, on the First Day of January and First Day of July in every year, make out a Return (in such Form as the Lords of the Admiralty from Time to Time direct) of all cases adjudged in the Court since the last half-yearly Return, and shall with all convenient Speed send the same to the Registrar of the High Court of Admiralty, who shall keep the same in the Registry of that Court, and who shall, as soon as conveniently may be, send the lords of the admiralty , who shall lay the same before both houses of parliament a Copy of the Returns of each Half Year .
After Appraisement, the Court may, if it thinks fit, direct that the captured Ship be delivered up to the Claimant, on his giving the satisfaction of the court Security to pay to the Captors the appraised Value thereof in case of Condemnation.
[Sidenote: Application of foregoing prize goods Provisions . ]
Where any Ship or Goods is or are taken by any of Her Majesty's Naval or Naval and Military Forces while acting in conjunction with any Forces of any of Her Majesty's Allies, a Prize Court shall have Jurisdiction as to the same as in the case of Prize, and shall have Power, after Condemnation, to apportion her majesty's ally the due share of the Proceeds , the proportionate Amount and the Disposition of which Share shall be such as may from Time to Time be agreed between Her Majesty and Her Majesty's Ally.
Before Condemnation, a Petition on behalf of asserted joint Captors shall not (except by special Leave of the Court) be admitted, unless and until they give the satisfaction of the court Security to contribute to the actual Captors a just Proportion of any Costs, Charges, and Expenses or Damages that may be incurred by or awarded against the actual Captors on account of the Capture and Detention of the Prize.
After Condemnation, such a Petition shall not (except by special Leave of the Court) be admitted unless and until the asserted joint Captors pay to the actual Captors a just Proportion of the Costs, Charges, and Expenses incurred by the actual Captors in the Case, and give such Security as aforesaid, and show the court sufficient Cause why their Petition was not presented before Condemnation.
A Prize Court, on Proof of any Offence against the Law of Nations, or against this Act, or any Act relating to Naval Discipline, or against any Order in Council or Royal Proclamation, or of any Breach of Her Majesty's Instructions relating to Prize, or of any Act of Disobedience to the Orders of the Lords of the Admiralty, or to the Command of a Superior Officer, committed by the Captors in relation to any Ship or Goods taken as Prize, or in relation to any Person on Board any such Ship, may, on Condemnation, reserve her majesty's disposal the Prize , notwithstanding any Grant that may have been made by Her Majesty in favour of Captors.
In case the Ship does not, within Six Months, return to a Port of the United Kingdom, the Re-captors may nevertheless institute Proceedings against the Ship or Goods in the High Court of Admiralty, and the Court may thereupon award the re-captors Prize Salvage as aforesaid , and may enforce Payment thereof, either by Warrant of Arrest against the Ship or Goods, or by Monition and Attachment against the Owner.
If, in relation to any War, Her Majesty is pleased to declare, by Proclamation or Order in Council, Her Intention to grant the officers and crews of her ships of war Prize Bounty , then such of the Officers and Crew of any of Her Majesty's Ships of War as are actually present at the taking or destroying of any armed Ship of any of Her Majesty's Enemies shall be entitled to have distributed among them as Prize Bounty a Sum calculated at the Rate of Five Pounds for each Person on board the Enemy's Ship at the Beginning of the Engagement.
The registrar of every prize court in a British possession shall, on the first day of January and first day of July in every year, make out a return (in such form as the Admiralty from time to time direct) of all cases adjudged in the court since the last half-yearly return, and shall with all convenient speed send the admiralty registrar of the probate , divorce , and admiralty division of the high court , who shall keep the same in the admiralty registry of that division , and who shall as soon as conveniently may be , send a copy of the returns of each half year to the admiralty , and the admiralty shall lay the same before both houses of parliament . the same
The registrar of every prize court in a British possession shall, on the first day of January and first day of July in every year, make out a return (in such form as the Admiralty from time to time direct) of all cases adjudged in the court since the last half-yearly return, and shall with all convenient speed send the same to the Admiralty registrar of the Probate, Divorce, and Admiralty Division of the High Court, who shall keep the same in the Admiralty registry of that Division, and who shall as soon as conveniently may be, send the admiralty a copy of the returns of each half year , and the Admiralty shall lay the same before both houses of Parliament.
(3) Where no ship papers are delivered up or found on board the captured ship, the officer in command, or one of the chief officers of the capturing ship, or some other person who was present at the capture, shall make that effect oath .
The court may, if it thinks fit, at any time after a captured ship has been appraised direct that the ship be delivered up to the claimant on his giving the satisfaction of the court security to pay to the captors the appraised value thereof in case of condemnation.
(3) If the ship does not, within six months, return to a port of His Majesty's dominions, the re-captors may nevertheless institute proceedings against the ship or goods in the High Court, or in any prize court in a British possession, and the court may thereupon award the re-captors prize salvage as aforesaid , and may enforce payment thereof, either by warrant of arrest against the ship or goods, or in the same manner as a judgment of the court in which the proceedings are instituted may be enforced.
If, in relation to any war, His Majesty is pleased to declare, by proclamation or Order in Council, his intention to grant the officers and crews of his ships of war prize bounty , then such of the officers and crew of any of His Majesty's ships of war as are actually present at the taking or destroying of any armed ship of any of His Majesty's enemies shall be entitled to have distributed among them as prize bounty a sum calculated at such rates and in such manner as may be specified in the proclamation or Order in Council.
33. --(1) A prize court shall make a decree declaring the prize bounty the title of the officers and crew of His Majesty's ship , and stating the amount thereof.
Where any ship or goods is or are taken by any of His Majesty's naval or naval and military forces while acting in conjunction with any forces of any of His Majesty's allies, a prize court shall have jurisdiction as to the same as in case of prize, and shall have power, after condemnation, to apportion his majesty's ally the due share of the proceeds , the proportionate amount and the disposition of which share shall be such as may from time to time be agreed between His Majesty and His Majesty's ally.

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.